Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 04:35 AM Aug 2013

Fukushima warning: danger level at nuclear plant jumps to 'serious'

Source: Guardian

The new warning, expected on Wednesday, comes only a day after the nuclear watchdog assigned a much lower ranking when the plant's operator, Tepco, admitted about 300 tonnes of highly toxic water had leaked from a storage tank at the site.

The Nuclear Regulation Authority has now said it will dramatically raise the incident's severity level from one to three on the eight-point scale used by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for radiation releases. Each single-digit increase in the scale actually represents a tenfold increase in the severity of a radiological release, according to the IAEA.

...The leak is the single most dangerous failure at the plant since the 2011 meltdown, which warranted the maximum level of seven on the severity scale, putting it on a par with the Chernobyl disaster 25 years earlier.

"Judging from the amount and the density of the radiation in the contaminated water that leaked ... a level three assessment is appropriate", the NRA said in a document posted on its website on Wednesday.

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/aug/21/leap-fukushima-danger-ranking



The article states that (contrary to some claims on DU) they still do not know the cause of this leak.
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fukushima warning: danger level at nuclear plant jumps to 'serious' (Original Post) kristopher Aug 2013 OP
My comment from yesterday appears to be on target: TexasTowelie Aug 2013 #1
You are citing your own previous comment with approval? Mysterysouppe Aug 2013 #16
I cited my own previous comment from an earlier thread TexasTowelie Aug 2013 #17
Citing yourself is an egotistical no-no in every civilized journalistic circle. Mysterysouppe Sep 2013 #34
Hello ~ Mysterysouppe In_The_Wind Sep 2013 #35
Congratulations. TexasTowelie Sep 2013 #37
Well aren't you adorable, lil newbie.... Hekate Aug 2013 #20
It's only a level 3 out of 7 come on...... 4bucksagallon Aug 2013 #2
really Supersedeas Aug 2013 #31
magenta alert .nt quadrature Aug 2013 #3
Do Scientists Know bucolic_frolic Aug 2013 #4
Not forever, just till it hits either the water table or a good sized pool of water Katashi_itto Aug 2013 #5
That's just it...there is NO SOLUTION... Moostache Aug 2013 #7
It took 600,000 from the Soviet army to just get Chernobyl away from total Katashi_itto Aug 2013 #9
Shooting them serves no purpose. eggplant Aug 2013 #8
Oh come on. Can't we get Mr. Spock to go in there and fix the reactor core? The Stranger Aug 2013 #11
Well we will get the dying part for sure. Katashi_itto Aug 2013 #14
Somewhere Inside the depths of the reactor you now got "Corium"... Katashi_itto Aug 2013 #15
I think today is the anniversary of one of the "Tickling the Dragon's Tail" fatal accidents. The Stranger Aug 2013 #21
Damn! I didnt know, thanks Katashi_itto Aug 2013 #23
The fearmongering hyperbole isn't necessary kristopher Aug 2013 #18
Righht... Katashi_itto Aug 2013 #19
You need to visit my journal kristopher Aug 2013 #27
Poor Kristopher Yo_Mama Aug 2013 #33
Poor Kristopher, is well, just poor RobertEarl Sep 2013 #36
No, it isn't "uncontrolled fission" burrowing or otherwise kristopher Aug 2013 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author Javaman Aug 2013 #6
Pro-Nuk Obama admin. raising guidelines on acceptable levels of radiation Divernan Aug 2013 #10
???? heaven05 Aug 2013 #12
On paper, nuclear power is the cleanest, ZombieHorde Aug 2013 #13
We don't have to worry/do anything until the danger level reaches "Holy Fucking Shit!!", right? truebrit71 Aug 2013 #22
They don't know WTF to do. kristopher Aug 2013 #25
Unless you're a nuke swooner, it's been serious for a very long time n/t IDemo Aug 2013 #26
that 412,000 tons of 'stored' contaminated water is out of the next tsunami waves path? Sunlei Aug 2013 #28
BBC article. proverbialwisdom Aug 2013 #29
I hope telco hasn't issued straws to those workers daleo Aug 2013 #30
It's not the danger level at the overall plant, but the level of this incident - the water leak Yo_Mama Aug 2013 #32

TexasTowelie

(111,945 posts)
17. I cited my own previous comment from an earlier thread
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 12:47 PM
Aug 2013

because it was a prediction that the Japanese government would revise the threat level. FWIW, my prediction was correct and the threat level became more severe.

Whether anyone else approved of the comment isn't within my control. One of the approving remarks occurred before this OP thread started while the other approving remark appeared as a response afterwards. Unless you think that an "I told you so" comment is meant to be "adorable", there wasn't any intention on my part to be "adorable".

However, I'll take the high road and apologize if I offended your sensibilities. However, I'll make another prediction to state that if you are so easily offended and call out DUers that have been here for years, then you probably aren't going to last long at DU.

BTW, welcome to DU.

4bucksagallon

(975 posts)
2. It's only a level 3 out of 7 come on......
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 05:15 AM
Aug 2013

Just eat fish 2 times a week. Remember it's good for your thyroid, and all those essential fish oils are good for you, mmmmmmm.

bucolic_frolic

(43,058 posts)
4. Do Scientists Know
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 06:53 AM
Aug 2013

what the outcome of this reaction will be?

Is it some kind of uncontrolled fission burrowing into the
rock and earth at this point? or is it still inside the building?

Do they know?

I'm not a scientist obviously, so do they know when this will
stop? Or could it continue for years? Deeper and deeper?

Baffling. Boggling.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
5. Not forever, just till it hits either the water table or a good sized pool of water
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 07:25 AM
Aug 2013

Then the resulting steam explosion will hurl thousands of pounds of radioactive steam in to the air.

OR if they make it to November (Coin toss now)

When they plan on removing the Rods MANUALLY from a wrecked core. (HAhahaha)

When removing rods from the core. They use computer guided arms JUST to remove rods from active cores when replacing or exchanging rods.

That is because a manual removal is WAY to dangerous.

That is from a working, laser-precise bundle where everything was as perfect as could be made (funny)

In this situation, they will be removing the rods from BURNT,MELTED,BROKEN, RADIOACTIVE, HOT, ALMOST MOLTEN HOT, WRECKED core.

It's an environment like those old disaster movies, out of control.

It's a fatal move.

What does need to be done, is Fire the TEPCO company, line the executives up and shoot them after letting them know their entire family just got carted off to FUkishima to work in the reactor cleanup till they melt.

And by shooting them let them also know they are getting an easier death than the hundreds of thousands if not countless millions, they themselves have killed.

Then hire a team of the BEST physicists and pray they can come up with something

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
7. That's just it...there is NO SOLUTION...
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 09:02 AM
Aug 2013

Its a situation that is beyond our technology and there is simply no way the powers that be can admit that, ever.

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
11. Oh come on. Can't we get Mr. Spock to go in there and fix the reactor core?
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 11:16 AM
Aug 2013

I saw it in the movies.

Then he died at the end and said "Live Long and Prosper."

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
14. Well we will get the dying part for sure.
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 11:43 AM
Aug 2013

As for "Live Long and Prosper" It might be more like...


"DEAR GOD MY FACE HAS SWOLLEN TO THE SIZE OF A WATERMELLON...JUST SHOOT ME...."

-Tickling The Dragon

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
15. Somewhere Inside the depths of the reactor you now got "Corium"...
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 11:52 AM
Aug 2013

Essentially Radioactive self-heating Lava

From Chernobyl:

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
18. The fearmongering hyperbole isn't necessary
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 01:01 PM
Aug 2013

The situation is nothing as you describe. Potential contamination of groundwater and marine food supply is very serious and has significant potential long term implications that make plenty bad. Your comments should be deleted unless you know something the rest of the world doesn't.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
19. Righht...
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 01:19 PM
Aug 2013

Here is one of many many papers on Fukishima...

There was an estimated 50 tons of reactor fuel and 800 tons of graphite left in the reactor at Chernobyl after the explosion there.
Fukushima has an estimated 70 tons of fuel in unit 1 and 90 tons of fuel in units 2 and 3. It is not known how much was ejected in the explosions at Fukushima.

For a grand total of 250 tons of fuel at Fukushima, dwarfing Chernobyl.

http://www.houseoffoust.com/fukushima/corium/corium.html

Corium Lava can melt a foot of concrete per hour — Cooling with water may not stop ...

Researchers at the Argonne National Lab created corium in the laboratory

They found that corium lava can melt upwards of 30 cm (12″ of concrete in 1 hour

This is why it is so important to know if a nuclear reactor accident has gone into true “meltdown” as the corium lava will rapidly melt its way through the inner containment vessels (or more) in a matter of hours unless it can be cooled again. However, results from these CCI (core-concrete interaction) experiments, suggest that cooling with water may not be sufficient to stop corium from melting the concrete.

One thing to remember — much of the melting of concrete during a meltdown occurs within minutes to hours, so keeping the core cool is vital for stopping the corium for breaching that containment vessel.

Now, this lava is, of course, very different than the lava that erupts from a volcano, compositionally.

The fuel pellets inside the fuel rods are almost entirely UO2 while the fuel rods in which the pellets are placed is made of zirconium alloys. As the fuel rods heat in an accident, they can get hot enough to start bending (close to 700°C) and if the pellets inside the casing touch, they can begin to melt if the temperature reaches ~1200ºC*. The heat can continue building as the fuel rods melt, eventually forming an entirely molten body that is a mix of the UO2 from the fuel pellets and the zirconium alloy of the casing.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
27. You need to visit my journal
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 02:00 PM
Aug 2013

You are preaching to the choir when you say to me that nuclear is a problem. Please consider the point I'm I'm trying to share with you - your hyperbolic uninformed fear-mongering delegitimizes honest criticism.

If you are really concerned, as I have no doubt you are, then take the time to read what is actually happening at the reactors Now.

http://ajw.asahi.com/category/0311disaster/fukushima/


Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
33. Poor Kristopher
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 06:17 PM
Aug 2013

I salute you for trying to spread knowledge.

Also your point that the situation is plenty serious enough without having to invent hazard is EXTREMELY valid.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
36. Poor Kristopher, is well, just poor
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 10:58 PM
Sep 2013

Katashi_itto is at least 90% correct. The cores have melted and they could have burned thru the concrete and into the ground. There have been quite a few days of steam events around the plants. Massive steam events.

The removal of the cores and melted spent fuel rods could very well cause new explosions.

Kristopher has downplayed the whole situation from day one, relying on Tepco's lies as the truth. He has refused to use info from other sources that have been proven over time to have been correct about what has transpired and which can no longer be hidden by Japan and its media.

There is massive contamination of the Pacific ocean which will only increase over time because the cores are now into the earth and groundwater is flowing past the cores carrying radioactive materials along with the flow.

I get that Kristopher wishes the best and that it will all just go away, but the truth is it is getting worse day by day.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
24. No, it isn't "uncontrolled fission" burrowing or otherwise
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 01:51 PM
Aug 2013

It is ongoing contamination from exposure of the melted (but now cooled) fuel to groundwater.

The article in the OP is about a tank holding highly contaminated water that is leaking and they don't know where, from the tank, it is leaking. This tank has been in use since the first days after the meltdown and is supposed to last about 5 years. They have several hundred tanks of this same design out of a total of about 1,000 tanks.

Total storage capacity available is 412,000 tons and 346,000 tons are filled. The amount keeps growing because groundwater is entering one of the reactors and becoming contaminated along with the cooling water they are circulating. They are expecting to increase storage to 800,000 tons by 2015 so they clearly have no way to actually fix the root problem.

If you don't know about this site I highly recommend it. Their archive back to the meltdown is a treasure and their ongoing coverage is the best available in English.
http://ajw.asahi.com/category/0311disaster/fukushima/

The information in this post is from there at this article: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201308210065

Response to kristopher (Original post)

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
10. Pro-Nuk Obama admin. raising guidelines on acceptable levels of radiation
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 10:27 AM
Aug 2013

It's just like that whole NSA/spying thing - nothing to worry about. Trust Obama. Stop reading international news sources! It's un-American. Or un-DLC anyway! As Dorothy Parker would say, "What fresh hell is this?"

US grass, hay and milk is contaminated with more than double the legal amount of radiation. 3 recent studies of milk purchased in San Francisco found all three batches contaminated with radio-isotopes. Scientists explained that milk will have a long-term contamination rate (2-30 years depending on specifics), because the nuclear fallout infects the grass and hay that dairy cows eat for years. (Energy News 4/16/12.)

Rainwater falling throughout the US has tested positive for radiation poisoning at 131 times the government recognized safe level. As scientists point out, ‘the rainwater coats the grass that cows eat, thus infecting the cow’s milk with radiation poisoning’. (BayCitizen.org.)

Americans can take heart however, the government is on the case.
Federal officials are already trying to change official guidelines governing radiation poisoning, raising the level of acceptable radiation.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/aug/21/leap-fukushima-danger-ranking

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
13. On paper, nuclear power is the cleanest,
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 11:35 AM
Aug 2013

in practice, it is totally fucked.

I wonder how bad this will get. It is already a mindboggling disaster.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
28. that 412,000 tons of 'stored' contaminated water is out of the next tsunami waves path?
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 02:30 PM
Aug 2013

probably stored right next to the beach front reactor

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
29. BBC article.
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 03:46 PM
Aug 2013
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-23776345

21 August 2013 Last updated at 12:26 ET
Japan nuclear agency upgrades Fukushima alert level


<>

The BBC's Rupert Wingfield-Hayes in Tokyo says it all adds to the impression that the clean-up operation is riddled with complacency and incompetence.

A puddle of the contaminated water was emitting 100 millisieverts an hour of radiation, Kyodo news agency said earlier this week.

Masayuki Ono, general manager of Tepco, told Reuters news agency: "One hundred millisieverts per hour is equivalent to the limit for accumulated exposure over five years for nuclear workers; so it can be said that we found a radiation level strong enough to give someone a five-year dose of radiation within one hour."

Teams of workers at the plant have surrounded the leaking tank with sandbags and have been attempting to suck up large puddles of radioactive water.

<>

daleo

(21,317 posts)
30. I hope telco hasn't issued straws to those workers
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 08:39 PM
Aug 2013

Because that seems to be the company's level of competence.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
32. It's not the danger level at the overall plant, but the level of this incident - the water leak
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 06:07 PM
Aug 2013

That is an important distinction. The Level 3 designation for the leak was suggested by Japan's nuclear regulators and confirmed by the IAEA.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fukushima warning: danger...