Entergy to Close Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant
Source: Google Finance, Wall Street Journal
By Ryan Tracy, Saabira Chaudhuri,
Entergy Corp. said Tuesday it will close its Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant late next year, the latest U.S. plant to close amid difficult economic times for the nuclear power industry.
Entergy said a number of financial factors were behind what Chief Executive Leo Denault called an agonizing decision and an extremely tough call.
The company said those factors included low natural-gas prices, the high costs of running a nuclear station with a single power-generating reactor, and flaws in the design of the regions electricity marketplace that do not provide adequate compensation to merchant nuclear plants for the fuel diversity benefits they provide.
Read more: http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-310012/
bananas
(27,509 posts)Glad they came to their senses.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)but it is a great move. Hopefully the workers can be retrained in green tech jobs and work in that field, also I am sure there will be work to decommission the plant.
TRoN33
(769 posts)Brattleboro are going to get one of largest solar energy production line in near future and create 300 new jobs in that town. It will be huge improvement to that small and beautiful town.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)No?
Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Sometimes I worry my messages are muddled.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)we'd be in good shape.
What tiny contribution will this piece of shit solar plant, in nothern latitudes, make to the area's grid? Do you have any idea, or are you just caught up in the excitement?
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)There's plenty of sun in the summer months. Actually, there's more sun in the northern latitudes during the summertime, so the further north they put a solar plant, the better for the air conditioners!
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)1 megawatt, or 1/1700 of the energy generated by Vermont Yankee day and night.
You really have no idea what you're talking about.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)What about future installations on houses that will add to the grid? Perhaps they don't need all that energy that is produced at Vermont Yankee, and just add it to the grid. If this is the case, YOUR point is quite moot, because there is potential solar energy all over the country.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)the potential is unlimited!"
The closing of Vermont Yankee is a consequence of having a public which is undereducated in basic physical principles. I suggest you put the brochure from the solar installer down and pick up a book on utility electricity generation.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)I have to sorely disagree with you.
Perhaps you are one of the folks who are being paid to troll here.
I understand electric generation, and using uranium to generate power is as one of my colleagues once said, "like cutting butter with a chain saw." It can be done, but it IS quite hazardous.
I don't think that you are willing to understand that by a lot of micro-generation of power, we can alleviate this "problem" in short order. I was working a couple of months ago with a friend, setting up a micro hydro plant, that requires very little running water. If it works, there can be literally millions of folks generating their power for free.
Well, I guess that you don't like free, because nobody makes a profit on free, but there ARE things in life that are more important than money.
Oh, and I wrote a paper on tidal power generation back in 1974. I was in my junior year in college, and it got an A. I was told to propose it to the NYC council, but they rejected it. However, in 2002, I think, they must have dusted it off, because they attempted to install tidal power in the East River, but the design was not mine, and it failed. They were using blades that were too large. But that's a discussion for another day. Just so that you should know, I could probably write one of those books on electricity generation.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)I don't care how sore your disagreement is, if you can't back it up wih numbers it's worthless.
How many gallons / minute does you micro-hydro require? What's the output in watts? You could probably write a book, could you?
Fine smart guy, give us some engineering instead of bullshit posturing.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)Why does VT need nuclear energy?
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)but that's what we will get.
The Lowell Mountain Ridge turbines are tearing the hell out of pristine Vermont forest, and generating about 40MW of energy - or 1/40th of the energy VY generates day and night.
Solar in VT is a joke.
Because VY energy went onto the New England Grid, VY not only generated power but income for the state. Now Vermont money will be going to Canada for Canadian gas - thanks to a sweetheart deal between Pete Shumlin and Green Mountain Energy.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)Sounds like an energy opportunity to put people to work.
Denctralized, labor 9ntensive labor energy opportunity, baby!!!!!!
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)but the ability to meet those requirements gets reduced by a factor of 40.
People have to work 40 times as hard, pay 40 times as much. Ripoff opportunity, baby!!!!!!!
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)Versus, say, a local blackout in Greenville? You, know, a non-nuclear event?
Have no idea where Greenboro might be from Vermont Yankee. I'm from Maine
- I get no benefits , but I more 6han share the risks.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)if you're on the New England grid. You get a lot of benefits from nuclear, including electricity at 4-5 cents/kwh versus four times that for wind or solar.
Since no one has ever been killed by a nuclear power accident in the U.S. I'll leave it the cost of this mythical accident up to your imagination.
Are you expecting a tsunami/earthquake in Vermont soon?
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)because many people have been killed in nuclear accidents in Japan, and the Soviet Union. Or did you forget about Chernobyl?
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)and no one in Japan has been killed as a result of Fukushima either .
Are you aware of that?
cali
(114,904 posts).
<snip>
The announcement is a watershed moment for the state. Though no power from the plant is being sold to utilities in Vermont now, for decades the facility was the states No. 1 source of baseload electricity. Over the last few years, Vermont Yankees rates, which had been locked in at 4 cents per kilowatt-hour, suddenly increased and were no longer as competitive. At the same time, natural gas flooded the electricity market and lowered costs throughout New England. The states largest utility, Green Mountain Power, struck a favorable deal with Seabrook, a nuclear power plant in New Hampshire, and Hydro-Quebec, for access to low-cost electricity from a series of megadam projects in Canada. At the same time, in an attempt to meet the states ambitious renewable energy goals, utilities invested in local wind and solar projects. -
See more at: http://vtdigger.org/2013/08/28/vermont-yankee-where-activists-lawyers-and-politicians-failed-the-market-succeeded/#sthash.s2JsWxUy.dpuf
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)This is a power play by GMP, owned by Gaz Metro of Quebec to sell Vermonters Canadian gas.
Local wind and solar contributions are insignificant, and by promoting these shiny toys GMP has suckered many environmentalists into believing Vermont's energy will be cleaner.
Closing VY will result in additional carbon emissions which are equivalent to half a million cars.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)And they are going to generate their own solar and wind power, to make US money.
That's right, Crane Paper are the folks who make the paper that you carry around in your wallet, and they are going to set an example for the future. When the plant is closed, it will feed its power back to the grid.
This is an example that other successful companies will take in the future, to maximize their profits.
Nuclear, and fossil fuels are NOT the future, Fusion and renewables are.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Ok, I checked your profile and see you're in sunny California, iow the desert, so I guess that explains your confusion.
A/C for the most part is a low priority in northern tier states, except maybe for the most incredibly pampered.
FYI:
Germany, which leads the world in solar power generation, is at 51.5167deg north.
Vermont is at 44.2035 deg north. Which is to say, south of Germany.
Maine is at 45 deg north, so slightly north of Vermont, but reigns as the sunniest state in New England.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)I can't wait.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)I've been getting post-nuke electric bills since I moved here 10 years ago, right after Maine Yankee closed.
My bill, for my 7 room 150 year old farmhouse, averages $30/month in the summer months.
In total, I spend maybe $7-800/year for electricity. If I chose or needed to, I could move my bedroom upstairs in winter and save myself about $200 by closing off the one room with electric heat, but it's the nicest room in my house.
Oh, and in Maine, not unlike Vermont, there are a lot of people who live off grid,including without indoor bathrooms.
Oh, and more bad news (for you) is that we do a lot of business with Canada up this way. No different than doing a lot of business with our other next door neighbors.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)Do you?
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Piece of shit solar? Tell it to Germany.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)It's costing German ratepayers $18 billion/year for a source that provides less than 5% of Germany's energy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_in_Germany
Largest German solar company files for bankruptcy
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90778/8319183.html
German Utility Revolts Against Renewable Energy, Threatens To Relocate In Turkey
http://www.forbes.com/sites/williampentland/2013/08/19/german-utility-revolts-against-renewable-energy-threatens-to-relocate-in-turkey/
"That's ok," you say. "It's clean energy, so it's worth it." German solar is an environmental nightmare, to all but the most gullible tools of the gas and coal industries:
Merkels Green Shift Forces Germany to Burn More Coal
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-19/merkel-s-green-shift-forces-germany-to-burn-more-coal-energy.html
Germany's clean energy drive fails to curb dirty brown coal
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/26/us-germany-browncoal-idUSBRE93P0PI20130426
Merkels Green Shift Backfires as German Pollution Jumps
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-28/merkel-s-green-shift-backfires-as-german-pollution-jumps.html
I don't need to tell Germany anything...maybe you should listen to what Germany has to say.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)and also ignoring our trade relations with Canada.
Germany is on a track to produce all electricity by solar by 2050. Suck on it!
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)"Maine does not currently produce nuclear energy, but thats not to say it doesnt reap its benefits. Many non-nuclear producing states across the country are able to power their businesses and homes by taking advantage of affordable, clean, and safe nuclear energy that feeds into the regional grid infrastructure. The state belongs to the Northeast Power Coordinating Council NERC region where 31 percent of the electricity produced in the region comes from nuclear energy."
http://casenergy.org/nuclear-energy/energy-in-your-state/nuclear-energy-in-maine/
Hint: your little laughing man is laughing at you.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)For 1.5 cents extra per kilowatt hour, I get this:
Maine Green Power is a program offered by the Maine Public Utilities Commission. You can choose clean, 100% Maine-made renewable energy for your home or business by enrolling today.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)How do they direct the clean electrons to your house and no one else's?
Here's how that works: you get exactly the same mix as all of your neighbors. By paying extra, your utility agrees to buy that amount of renewable energy on the grid. And about 2/3 of "renewable" energy generated in Maine comes from cutting down trees and burning them.
"Using wood per unit of electricity emits more C02 into the atmosphere than than coal or oil -- you actually create a carbon debt," says John Hagan, Manomet's president.
He agrees with the industry that biomass is renewable, unlike coal or oil. And that carbon emissions from biomass get cancelled out by the CO2 absorbed by trees before they are turned into wood for burning. But he says it can take a long time for that cycle to happen.
"There's a greenhouse gas debt before there's a dividend. And so the question becomes, how long does it take to pay off the debt before you start to appreciate the the climate benefits of using wood?" Hagan says. "So if it's a large electricity plant, like a 50-megawatt electricity plant, the debt period could be 20 or 30 years before you start to appreciate a carbon benefit."
http://www.mpbn.net/News/MaineNewsArchive/tabid/181/ctl/ViewItem/mid/3475/ItemId/12571/Default.aspx
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)wtmusic hates the sun? Why? Because it is too cheap to meter.
Meanwhile his love, the nuke plants, owned and operated by the 1%, are breaking his heart, because one-by-one, like VY, they are closing before they blow sky high like Cheronbyl and Fukushima. He haz a sad they can't go all the way?
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)is only slightly higher than average *monthly* electric bills in his neck of the woods.
Now he really haz a sad!
Mopar151
(9,979 posts)Decommisioning will be much the same as a maintainence outage, and the workers who do that are spread across the region - and are likely working at their trades anyway, just not getting the fat money from their occasional nuke work.
Entergy blew it, pure and simple - cut back too much on maintainence, ran sloppy, and figured they could get whatever out of the local politicans. Not in Vermont.......
The generating plant may be savable, but it would have to be expanded and reconfigured to make efficent use of another power source like natural gas or coal - whether it is economical to do so is a big question. VT Yankee is not far from a major rail line, FWIW.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I was there in Brattleboro Vermont's big rally against nuclear power plant. And its the first time ever in nation history that we fought against them and won. It was amazing experience to be part of nearly 600 marchers against Entergy because they lied to us and after we caught them lying, they continue to lie to us and believe they would fool us. They didn't realize that Vermonters' reputation are known for being strong mind and never to forget. And we are well aware that Entergy are also the strongest contributors to Republican's anti-American cause. No more.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)VY will be replaced by tearing down Vermont's forests for "biomass" energy and importing Canadian gas.
Vermont residents bought the whole scam hook, line and sinker - and the climate, the world's oceans, and the world's habitat will pay for your "peace of mind".
We're fucked.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)They will build more solar farms, on land already cleared. They can also do rooftop solar.
What makes you think that they will tear down the Green Mountain's forest?
I can see from your profile that you live on the other side of the country. This explains your lack of understanding.
We are screwed any way, why should we have more chance that an ancient nuclear plant will go kablooie here in the northeast?
Shut the old thing down, it's served the time that it was designed to serve, and should be put to rest. Think of how much it would cost to retrofit the thing. The concrete alone would cost a small fortune. I believe that this is why Entergy is dropping it. They simply can't make a profit on that old thing any more.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)and Pete Shumlin and Mary Powell are playing you like a cheap fiddle. All the ignorant Vermonters who wished for this deserve what they will get: your state revenue being shipped off to Canada to Gaz Metro for gas, your carbon emissions and energy prices going through the roof, and some astroturf solar facilities that don't generate squat:
"To wit: Three members of Shumlins transition team Elizabeth Bankowski, Kathy Hoyt and Steve Terry had direct ties to the utility (Green Mountain Power); GMP CEO Mary Powell chaired Shumlins inaugural committee; GMP exec Neale Lunderville has been hired to head up the states recovery efforts in the wake of Tropical Storm Irene; and DPS Commissioner Liz Millers husband is a partner in the law firm that represents GMP before the Public Service Board.
If the merger is approved, GMP and its parent company, Montréal-based Gaz Métro, would control roughly 70 percent of the states electric wholesale, retail and distribution markets.
'No one is likely to examine it with the healthy skepticism and independence necessary in a deal of this significance to the state,' Burak told Fair Game. "
http://www.7dvt.com/2011gorillas-ghosts-and-greed
The deal was approved, and Entergy made a smart business decision - if you're not in the game, get the hell out. Sickening.
Cooling tower collapse, from maintainence failures that any VT farmer or carpenter would have caught (wet wood will rot unless it stays wet). Tritium leaks into the groundwater & river, that Entergy tried to lie away.
Only scams around were the ones Entergy was runnin', and, thanks to the thirst of most nuke techs, the bartender at Mort's Roadhouse likely knows more about plant operations than the management.
Mopar151
(9,979 posts)Spent a pile of money on a bad guess, then cemented it by running the plant into the ground. Ga-ron-tee they try to skate with the decomissioning money.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)and your utility bills are going up.
I can't wait. "Vermonters get a lesson in energy".
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)If I install solar panels on my roof, I will get back my investment in less than ten years. The panels have a guaranteed lifetime of 25 years, and will more than likely last much longer than that.
If enough folks do the same, and put their surplus solar energy back into the grid, this issue goes away. Even if they only produce their own power it goes away
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)Going off the grid? Gonna pedal a bike after the sun goes down?
What a joke.
Mopar151
(9,979 posts)$20 grand to run a powerline in to your place, and it can crap out for days at a time here. Wait til you figure out ice pond a/c and refrigeration, heat storage and micro-hydro. Ever seen a soapstone woodstove?
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)What if you can't afford a nice place in the forest by the pond, or by the stream for your "micro-hydro"?
Can you keep the smoke from that woodstove in Vermont? Didn't think so. Natural gas heat would create much less carbon, and nuclear would create none.
Basically, everyone living your dream would result in an environmental nightmare. That's the problem with rugged individualists - they start to think the world exists just for them.
Mopar151
(9,979 posts)And biomass accumulates all it's carbon from the atmosphere, so any carbon remaining, whether in ash or composted,is sequestered from the atmosphere - a wash, over the life cycle of the Biomass. And a working, harvested forest, and many croplands, absorb much more CO2 than mature "old growth".
Many New England towns are MILL towns - hydro power drove the industrial revolution, which started here, and many of those small dams are still around, and still capable of producing power. So even if you live in the slums, you are quite likely to be near a source of hydro power.
Here's one for ya, Mr Nuke - did you know that much of the "off-peak" power from Vermont Yankee was stored as hydro power, at the Northfield Mountain project a few towns south? I know guys worked on that, too, just Like Seabrook and VY. It'll work just fine with solar or wind power. That's how solar works in the dark!
You wanna talk enviromental nightmare? Tons of steel, weakened and eroded by irradition, far too "Hot" to recycle, deemed useless by it's original desiginers along about now - That's the reality in Vernon, VT. Entergy presumed that they could patch it up some, and get a 20 year extension at overcapacity by Vermont regulators. Apparently, they did'nt talk to many Vermonters first. So now, it's gotta be "Chernoybled" in place, or hauled to the Hanford Reservation to be buried next to the core of Mass. Yankee.
Mopar151
(9,979 posts)The massive cost overruns and poor financial planning of Seabrook Station bankrupted PSNH (taken over by NU, who could fuck up gravity), and most utilities in the region had invested in Seabrook, so we're paying for a reactor (Seabrook 2) that was never built.
Entergy has been making moves on the decomissioning fund right from the start of their ownership - 'cuz they thought they could put off decomissioning (via operating license extension) for long enough to skeez out on some of the costs and play lots of games with the money.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)Wish I could see your face when you get your first post-VY electricity bill, but you can chalk this one up as a valuable educational experience.
"As of 2010, most of the energy is purchased wholesale for distribution from Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant and Hydro-Québec. The costs from Vermont Yankee were about 3 to 5 cents per kilowatt hour.
In 2009, the state received 1/3 or 400 MW of its power from Hydro-Québec and 1/3 from Vermont Yankee. In total, the state got half its power from Canada and other states. It received 75 percent of the power it generated in the state from Vermont Yankee.
Vermont has the highest rate of nuclear-generated power in the nation, 73.7 percent. As one result, Vermont is one of only two states with no coal-fired power plant.
Wholesale rates from electricity produced by natural gas have been 5 to 7 cents per kilowatt hour."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_in_Vermont
Mopar151
(9,979 posts)wtmusic
(39,166 posts)imagination will suffice.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)A spent-fuel pool fire at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant made headlines after Marchs earthquake and tsunami but the threat may be worse in America.
Related stories
Meltdown 101: What are spent-fuel pools and why are they a threat?
Meltdown 101: A brief glossary of nuclear terms
Meltdown 101: What is a nuclear reactor meltdown?
Nuclear power report: 14 'near misses' at US plants due to 'lax oversight'
Do US nuclear plants have defective parts? NRC finds reporting flaws.
Spent nuclear fuel stored in water-filled pools at many nuclear reactor sites in the US far surpasses in volume and radioactivity the threat posed by such material at Fukushima, according to a new study.. The huge hazard could be largely eliminated by moving older materials from the pools into dry cask storage, it said.
Unprotected and crowded spent nuclear fuel pools pose an unacceptable threat to the public, said Robert Alvarez, a senior scholar for nuclear policy at the nonpartisan Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), as well as a former Department of Energy official in the Clinton Administration, in a statement.
Throckmorton
(3,579 posts)However, the State of Vermont will need to fight for this. Entergy will try and leave them in the spent fuel pool while the rest of the plant around them rots (See Millstone One under Dominion).
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)Antinukes killed Yucca Mountain. They kind of fucked themselves, didn't they?
Throckmorton
(3,579 posts)or until there is money to be made in their removal.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)the Connecticut River will overflow thanks to ignorant decisions made regarding climate change, turning the casks into pontoons filled with long-lived radionucleides hurtling toward the sea.
Antinukes are truly experts at fucking themselves, which I wouldn't care about if they didn't fuck everyone else too.
Throckmorton
(3,579 posts)more like concrete boulders fracturing into rubble when they go over Turners Falls.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)Most of the world might be spared the radiation, and some nth generation of Vermonters will have to bear the burden their ancestors created.
So there is some measure of karma here, although downstreamers living in 2313 Connecticut wouldn't deserve it.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)You actually wish they get some kind of nuclear radiation karma visited upon them just because they don't want to have a man made nuclear environment like there now exists at Chernobyl and Fukushima?
WTMofo kind of crap are you spreading?
Mopar151
(9,979 posts)Or understand the huge seasonal flow variations innherent in our climate. Check the altitude of Vernon, Vt. - it's well above sea level.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)wtmusic
(39,166 posts)by pushing their ineffectual toys as a solution to climate change.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)just swung the other way.
Got all they could get, now hand over the shutdown, cleanup costs to the taxpayer and move on.
Afterthought: I assume they'll be claiming a loss on their next tax return?
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Living in Maine, love to see the risks art going down.