EXCLUSIVE-U.S. delays deadline for finalizing Obamacare health plans
Source: Reuters
EXCLUSIVE-U.S. delays deadline for finalizing Obamacare health plans
Source: Reuters - Wed, 28 Aug 2013 04:50 AM
Author: Reuters
* Agreements with companies put off for days or weeks
* Officials say launch still set for Oct. 1
* Technology issues said to be responsible
By David Morgan and Caroline Humer
WASHINGTON, Aug 28 (Reuters) - The Obama administration has delayed a step crucial to the launch of the new healthcare law, the signing of final agreements with insurance plans to be sold on federal health insurance exchanges starting Oct. 1.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) notified insurance companies on Tuesday that it would not sign final agreements with the plans between Sept. 5 and 9, as originally anticipated, but would wait until mid-September instead, according to insurance industry sources.
Nevertheless, Joanne Peters, a spokeswoman for HHS, said the department remains "on track to open" the marketplaces on time on Oct. 1.
The reason for the hold-up was unclear. Sources attributed it to technology problems involving the display of insurance products within the federal information technology system.
Peters said only that the government was responding to "feedback" from the companies, "providing additional flexibility and time to handle technical requests."
Read more: http://www.trust.org/item/20130828043839-7henz/?source=search
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)What the fuck is going on?
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)You go in hoping for something, only to find they've changed it for something else?
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)The bait and switch occurs in the title of the article.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Had no idea you were a DUer.
You outed yourself by deriding hope and change. Oh, Sarah.
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts). . . until it became clear it was nothing but an empty campaign slogan. From a President I voted for TWICE.
dragonlady
(3,577 posts)Just another way the Republicans have tried to cripple the Affordable Care Act. The federal government has had to step in and do all that work itself, so is it really surprising that the schedule would be set back just a little?
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)I don't think that is a factor at all.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)for billing. My mom works in the billing department of a hospital and was telling me how backlogged they are. Apparently after several months of overtime they were able to finally catch up. I'm not sure about insurance companies. I used to know someone who worked at one.
David__77
(23,369 posts)There are some really fucked up priorities. Are they trying to destroy the Democratic Party?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Obamacare.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Do you folks even read before you type? And if so, do you bother to think about what you are typing?
David__77
(23,369 posts)Giving businesses another year, etc. This is life and death, and there is waiver and delay and waiver and delay. The point stands.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Less than 1% of the nation's large employers are getting the 1 year break.
It took 20 years before Social Security covered even just 90% of workers in this country.
The vast majority of the significant parts of the ACA have already gone into effect or are going into effect as planned. Medicaid expansion, the subsidies, pre-existing condition denial ban, the 80/20 rule, funding for thousands of free clinics, mandatory free preventative care, children staying on their parent's insurance, etc. Waiting another year for the business mandate does not negate all of that stuff, not even close. You are being very small minded about this.
And lets not pretend that the nature of your initial response to this thread insinuated that this one week delay on the final agreement is somehow significant and could "destroy the Democratic Party?"? Lets not pretend that you didn't just knee jerk react to a headline without reading anything about it.
David__77
(23,369 posts)So screw the people that don't work for the largest companies then?
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)I make a regular old 5 figure middle class salary so no subsidies for me.
There is very little in the ACA that will help me, other than the notion that the exchanges and influx of new customers might eventually drive my premiums down on the insurance that I have, which I buy completely on my own.
But its not about me. I can afford to buy my own insurance for me and my wife. It ain't the greatest. It cost a good chunk of monthly change, but I can manage to swing it. For me its about movement. There will undoubtedly be a significant number more people who don't have some kind of coverage who will have it by this time next year. No matter what you say, that's a wonderful thing.
I definitely care about the people who will still be left out. But I'm not so naïve that I expect 100% on day 1. Its a side effect of the human condition that we don't achieve perfection with instant gratification.
David__77
(23,369 posts)That's partly because I have some influence. Smaller companies should do so whenever they can, though I understand that competitiveness/uneven playing fields would make it hard to do. The 50 employee limit has got to go away at some point too.
I'm glad that you have a good alternative means to get insurance. It can be difficult. The benefits of even a very small group can be significant.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,804 posts)And like the true RW Libertarians that they have become, DUers choose not to read, let alone try to comprehend.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)2nd bullet says ... "Officials say launch still set for Oct. 1"
So its delayed, but it will still start on Oct 1st, as planned.
This kind of stuff cracks me up.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)of preliminary deadlines related to finalizing and launching the exchanges,
And it looks like some of the states will be delayed on their exchanges, or may not have them open to the public on Oct 1st.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-health-insurance-enroll-20130823,0,6192676.story
If you don't have approved insurance plans, there is nothing to sell on the exchange. The explanation makes no sense to me, and I am a techie. Why should problems showing plans on a website change or delay a regulatory action such as this?
The computer testing deadline has been delayed as well.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Actually I'm a medicaid caseworker. I go to our training for HBE's next week. Personally I do not like the law. Professionally I will do what my role and the law requires of me.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)That's really big news. Why is the MSM suppressing this story?