Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Galraedia

(5,022 posts)
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 06:57 PM Sep 2013

Former Cheney aide Mary Matalin demands Syria ‘exit strategy’ from Obama

Source: Raw Story

Mary Matalin, a Republican strategist and former advisor to Vice President Dick Cheney, on Sunday said that Americans had become “war wise” after the Iraq war and demanded that President Barack Obama produce an exit strategy before launching an attack on Syria.

During an ABC News panel discussion, Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan observed that the president had “turned the tables” by asking Congress for approval to take military action over Syria’s alleged use of chemical weapons on its own citizens.

“I think they didn’t have the support and the horror of Iraq still lingers over the United States and the world,” Democratic strategist James Carville explained. “And this will force attention, it will force them to bring the evidence, it will force the Congress. All in all, I think it’s a pretty good thing to do.”

Matalin, however, suggested that Obama had a cynical plan to “blame the Republicans for being obstructionists” if Congress refused to authorize military force.

Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/09/01/former-cheney-aide-mary-matalin-demands-syria-exit-strategy-from-obama/

55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former Cheney aide Mary Matalin demands Syria ‘exit strategy’ from Obama (Original Post) Galraedia Sep 2013 OP
She looked like some small animal pscot Sep 2013 #1
matalin kardonb Sep 2013 #2
That's exactly what I was thinking. LeftofObama Sep 2013 #4
Why do we need an exit strategy if we never go in? nt kelliekat44 Sep 2013 #34
It was a WHIG GreatCaesarsGhost Sep 2013 #10
And I 'demand' her to STFU Tx4obama Sep 2013 #3
I'm with you. Yeesh. Hekate Sep 2013 #32
It's a sad fact that we had to kill hundred of thousands and spend 3 trillion dollars WHEN CRABS ROAR Sep 2013 #5
Yes, it is, and they robbed social security to get the money! juajen Sep 2013 #29
Isn't that special! liberal N proud Sep 2013 #6
Here is the exit strategy............. mrmpa Sep 2013 #7
You are presuming it will stop there. Syria has a very sophisticated air network, up to date jtuck004 Sep 2013 #24
Oh, Shoot RobinA Sep 2013 #43
"too cowardly to fight on our own soil" ??? Egnever Sep 2013 #45
>Mary is an idiot.< No she''s not. You may not like what she says, but she knows jtuck004 Sep 2013 #48
Limited action sounds nice as a sound-bite swilton Sep 2013 #55
"Launching missiles" is not enough ... JustABozoOnThisBus Sep 2013 #40
Fuck you Mary Matalin warrior1 Sep 2013 #8
You better not use your dick!! pocoloco Sep 2013 #31
I wouldn't use Carville's dick ! She looks hideous. King_Klonopin Sep 2013 #33
Do something constructive, Ms. Matalin: Make peace between the Cheney daughters. Paladin Sep 2013 #9
"Mary Matalin...said that Americans had become “war wise” after the Iraq war" BumRushDaShow Sep 2013 #11
I haven't personally made up my mind on this issue but Matalin is the last person who.... Blasphemer Sep 2013 #47
WHIG....now there's some irony for ya! VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #52
Ha! N/t iamthebandfanman Sep 2013 #12
Listen up, Mary! You can't demand shit from anyone given your abysmal track record! CTyankee Sep 2013 #13
The American public might consider suggesting that Mary Matalin go take a flying indepat Sep 2013 #14
Her boss Cheney and Bush declared themselves war heroes. Kingofalldems Sep 2013 #15
It appears the exit strategy to get out of Iraq was to elect Barack Obama and let him get us out. Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #16
Obama is still on the track for disaster, despite his punt to Congress, a digressin that might The Second Stone Sep 2013 #17
Step 1. Divorce James Caraville Billy Love Sep 2013 #18
Welcome to DU gopiscrap Sep 2013 #22
Just like she did for Bush and Iraq! tabasco Sep 2013 #19
Better yet, pull all the US support for any and all sides and just don't go there in the first place Demeter Sep 2013 #20
Fucking asshole gopiscrap Sep 2013 #21
How typical. cstanleytech Sep 2013 #23
I didn't see where repukes were demanding Obama get congressional approval. hughee99 Sep 2013 #49
Here cstanleytech Sep 2013 #51
I hadn't seen this before. hughee99 Sep 2013 #53
Hypocritical opportunist. City Lights Sep 2013 #25
Mary knows from bad choices BeyondGeography Sep 2013 #26
STFU. nt onehandle Sep 2013 #27
lolololol Solly Mack Sep 2013 #28
that's rich...coming from an Admin that brought us Iraq and Afghanistan Supersedeas Sep 2013 #30
She still around? PuffedMica Sep 2013 #35
Hey Matalin, our President answered your question before you asked it PuffedMica Sep 2013 #36
Rumsfeld demanded more Steviehh Sep 2013 #37
My Exit Strategy: no_hypocrisy Sep 2013 #38
She has a lot of nerve. Glimmer of Hope Sep 2013 #39
If Bush didn't need one in Iraq and Afghanistan, Obama sure as hell doesn't need one in Syria. Octafish Sep 2013 #41
Interesting RobinA Sep 2013 #42
Oh they irony! sakabatou Sep 2013 #44
There were none... and look how that worked out. n/t hughee99 Sep 2013 #50
she should be working for tips at Bun & Run olddots Sep 2013 #46
He's black, so she needs an exit strategy. Arkana Sep 2013 #54

pscot

(21,024 posts)
1. She looked like some small animal
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 07:01 PM
Sep 2013

crawled up on her head and died. Is that her own hair, do you think?

 

kardonb

(777 posts)
2. matalin
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 07:04 PM
Sep 2013

who is she to "demand " anything ? Just a small "Gernegross " to make her seem important and relevant , which she certainly is not .

WHEN CRABS ROAR

(3,813 posts)
5. It's a sad fact that we had to kill hundred of thousands and spend 3 trillion dollars
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 07:10 PM
Sep 2013

to become "war wise".
Many of us knew that going in.
But hey, three trillion is a lot of profits.
BASTARDS!

mrmpa

(4,033 posts)
7. Here is the exit strategy.............
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 07:20 PM
Sep 2013

after the Navy ships are done launching missiles, they turn the ships around and leave the area...

Don't flame me, but if you understand what the President wants to do, then you know the exit strategy. There's no explanation needed to be given to Matalin. She should be smart enough to already know the answer.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
24. You are presuming it will stop there. Syria has a very sophisticated air network, up to date
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 09:22 PM
Sep 2013

weapons from the Russians, and plenty of targets that are allies of ours to shoot at. If they shoot back, will Russia get more involved? Will we, who are too cowardly to fight on our own soil, have another proxy war going on in someone else's backyard...again?

This "limited action" is, in theory, just that, and not meant to depose the ruler. But let's say he gets killed, or the distraction allows him to be killed. His power is the only thing between about a million Sunni Muslims and utter chaos, many of whom may well die if we break the place open. Al Qaeda being the best organized group, both really fanatical AQ's and more moderate AQ's would then be in control of anything we don't destroy.

Possible, but the odds are against it being as easy as shooting a few missiles and going home in time for the weekend.

Matalin is just throwing shit against the fan - that's her job - but that's not bad question to be pondering...

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
45. "too cowardly to fight on our own soil" ???
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 04:40 PM
Sep 2013

We project our military power so we dont have to fight on our own soil.

The idea that syria has an air defense that would give us any trouble is laughable.

I am not sure what the right answer is in this situation. But we have the most commanding military in the world bar none. They arent afraid to fight anywhere be it our soil or theirs, they volunteered to do it.

Mary is an idiot.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
48. >Mary is an idiot.< No she''s not. You may not like what she says, but she knows
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 11:15 PM
Sep 2013

exactly what she is doing, and she is a smart strategist, and is married to, I think, a smarter one. Whether it will be effective or not is to be seen,

Our own military has reported that we are at risk from Syrian Air Defense - and there are a lot of shoulder-fired missiles out there that could cause real trouble. You won't be there, of course, so I can see how you wouldn't see any danger.

You are also assuming (lots of assumptions out there in this by know-nothing patriots out there to mix in with) that they will only shoot at us. Yet Syria has some very sophisticated technology, some of it pointed at Israel, and a couple of other places I suspect. And while it might be suicide, the outcome could be a country led by Al Qaeda, and perhaps a shooting war with Russia. Fun times there.

Yet you are correct, we have a commanding military, full of might and all that. We provide it by killing hundreds of innocent children and families every year, some for just playing in the dirt, arguing that their deaths are necessary to pursue some un-named bad guys. More necessary deaths as we shot thousands of fleeing, surrendering soldiers in the back as they run down a highway in Iraq. (While our real enemies, the corporations, take the homes and lives of their friends and neighbors back home). Yep, big, mighty military.

Love that flag you're waving, btw. Use it to cover the bodies?

 

swilton

(5,069 posts)
55. Limited action sounds nice as a sound-bite
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 02:06 PM
Sep 2013

for the chicken hawks to banter around to their sycophants in the press.

When the practicalities of war are experienced, the story is much different.

Can't stand Matalin - ever the opportunist and prima donna; her reaction is something she herself should have thought about 101/2 years ago when she was waving the flag for an Iraq War.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,338 posts)
40. "Launching missiles" is not enough ...
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 10:03 AM
Sep 2013

... if it doesn't cause Assad's downfall. If the rebels aren't winning, then we need to do more.

And any replacement government will be out of control, so we'll need to do more.

There is no "enough".

No exit.

Paladin

(28,250 posts)
9. Do something constructive, Ms. Matalin: Make peace between the Cheney daughters.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 07:26 PM
Sep 2013

Keep your head down, OK?

BumRushDaShow

(128,803 posts)
11. "Mary Matalin...said that Americans had become “war wise” after the Iraq war"
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 07:30 PM
Sep 2013


That black face sure turned her world upside down. Meanwhile...

August 2002: Top Bush Officials Form Group to Sell Iraq War to Public, Congress, and Allies

White House chief of staff Andrew Card forms the White House Iraq Group, or WHIG, which aims to “educate the public” about the alleged threat from Iraq. WHIG is formed concurrently with the Office of Special Plans (see September 2002). A senior official involved with the group will later describe it as “an internal working group, like many formed for priority issues, to make sure each part of the White House was fulfilling its responsibilities.” [Washington Post, 8/10/2003] According to White House deputy press secretary Scott McClellan, the WHIG is “set up in the summer of 2002 to coordinate the marketing of the [Iraq] war,” and will continue “as a strategic communications group after the invasion had toppled Saddam [Hussein]‘s regime.” McClellan, who will become a full-fledged member of the WHIG after rising to the position of senior press secretary, will write: “Some critics have suggested that sinister plans were discussed at the WHIG meetings to deliberately mislead the public. Not so. There were plenty of discussions about how to set the agenda and influence the narrative, but there was no conspiracy to intentionally deceive. Instead, there were straightforward discussions of communications strategies and messaging grounded in the familiar tactics of the permanent campaign.” [McClellan, 2008, pp. 142] Author Craig Unger will sum up the WHIG’s purpose up more bluntly: “to sell the war.” Members of the group include White House political advisers Karl Rove, Karen Hughes, [font size="4" color="red"]Mary Matalin[/font], James R. Wilkinson, and Nicholas E. Calio, and policy advisers led by National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, her deputy Stephen Hadley, and Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, Lewis “Scooter” Libby. They meet weekly in the White House Situation Room. A “strategic communications” task force under the WHIG is charged with planning speeches and writing position papers.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=white_house_iraq_group

Blasphemer

(3,261 posts)
47. I haven't personally made up my mind on this issue but Matalin is the last person who....
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 05:30 PM
Sep 2013

Last edited Mon Sep 2, 2013, 06:04 PM - Edit history (1)

we need to hear from right now. Actually, I don't want to hear from any member of the Bush-Cheney cabal and their supporters. Yeah, the country is "war-wise" because of people like Matalin supporting inane policies in lock-step. Ideally, this discussion would be cool-headed and apolitical. This is not just a 2013 debate, you can go as far back as the turn of the century and many of the basic questions are the same.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
16. It appears the exit strategy to get out of Iraq was to elect Barack Obama and let him get us out.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 08:07 PM
Sep 2013

All in all it is a good to have an exit strategy and I feel sure this is a part of a limited plan. Maybe Putin can advise Assad he needs to halt the chemical warfare and leave Syria.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
17. Obama is still on the track for disaster, despite his punt to Congress, a digressin that might
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 08:11 PM
Sep 2013

lead to something less than disaster.

Bombing someone without the means to back it up by accomplishing military and political objectives is just terrorism. It will make the world a worse place to live in. It isn't going to change anyone's mind, or anyone's course of action. A round of punitive bombing will only harden everyone's position. If you (and by that I mean we) are going to commit acts of war, why not have achievable military objectives?

Short of going to war, there are a number of diplomatic and economic sanctions that would draw a large consensus among the international community. Also, indictments at the Hague would be appropriate.

Punitive bombing is not a plan or a policy, it's terrorism.

 

Billy Love

(117 posts)
18. Step 1. Divorce James Caraville
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 08:25 PM
Sep 2013

Step 2. Commit yourself to the nearest mental institution
Step 3. Stay there for 35+ years until you pass away.

there. that's the exit strategy.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
20. Better yet, pull all the US support for any and all sides and just don't go there in the first place
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 08:52 PM
Sep 2013

It's cheaper, more legal, more honest, better for the environment, and less fattening.

cstanleytech

(26,280 posts)
23. How typical.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 09:03 PM
Sep 2013

They demanded that Obama get congressional approval so he decides to extend an olive branch and do just that and now they proceed to try and beat him to death with said branch.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
49. I didn't see where repukes were demanding Obama get congressional approval.
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 12:11 AM
Sep 2013

It seems like a bad repuke strategy to actually have congress vote on this.

cstanleytech

(26,280 posts)
51. Here
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 12:18 AM
Sep 2013
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/319127-55-house-members-say-obama-needs-approval-from-congress-in-syria-strikes

Also

http://www.livemint.com/Politics/boYrQYVCQBz14HrSZbrYfL/US-lawmakers-ask-Obama-to-consult-Congress-before-striking-S.html

“Before any action is taken regarding Syria, it is imperative that President Obama make the case to the American people and consult with Congress,” top Republican Senator John Cornyn, said amidst reports that the US is considering a military action in Syria."

Edit: And yes they played their hand to early and ended up painting themselves into a corner because if they deny his request to take action they will appear as assholes and he can say they are obstructing him thus its not his fault for not doing anything but theirs and if they authorize it goes wrong then the blowback will largely land on them just before an election to and they cant take credit if it goes well, either way its a win win.

PuffedMica

(1,061 posts)
36. Hey Matalin, our President answered your question before you asked it
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 06:46 AM
Sep 2013

Check this out:
Obama said he is considering a "limited narrow act,"
"We're not considering any open ended commitment. We're not considering any boots on the ground "

So just what is Mary Matalin (R - Stupid) question about 'exit strategy' again?

Steviehh

(115 posts)
37. Rumsfeld demanded more
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 08:42 AM
Sep 2013

D. Rumsfeld demanded a detailed strategy and exit plan also. They believe Americans just forget the past.

RobinA

(9,888 posts)
42. Interesting
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 03:27 PM
Sep 2013

how only Democratic Presidents need exit strategies.

When Clinton went into Kosovo, Repubs screamed "no exit strategy." When Bush went into Iraq and Afghanistan...silence. Now it seems with Obama they've rediscovered the exit strategy.

I'm opposed to going to Syria with or without an exit strategy, but I do find this interesting.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Former Cheney aide Mary M...