Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 05:42 PM Sep 2013

Kerry lobbies Senate on Syria: 'Iran is hoping you look the other way

Source: JPost

President Barack Obama's national security team made their case publicly on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, arguing in front of sympathetic senators why an attack on Bashar Assad's regime in Syria is both a moral and strategic imperative.

Senator Robert Menendez, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, opened the hearing with an endorsement of the resolution, calling it "not a declaration of war but a declaration of our values to the world."

.............

Ranking member of the committee Bob Corker said he is inclined to support the resolution, but hopes the White House will reinforce military support to moderate opposition forces.

"I know that people in the region are watching," he said, charging that America's credibility is on the line.



Read more: http://www.jpost.com/International/Kerry-lobbies-Senate-on-Syria-Iran-is-hoping-you-look-the-other-way-325225

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
2. So, there was no chemical warfare used?
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 05:49 PM
Sep 2013

You can disagree on the correct action, but it is not true that nothing happened. In the case of Iraq, nothing had happened and the things we were told to fear were not true.

If you are speaking of the reference to Iran, that is conjecture. Conjecture can be wrong, but can't be a lie.

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
3. It does seem that some chemical munitions were used in Syria, but that
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 06:02 PM
Sep 2013

is not what Kerry is offering here. Kerry is telling us that we must fear Iran if we do not strike Syria. I think this statement by Kerry and the mushroom cloud statements of the Bush era are very similar in intent.

Cheers!

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
4. What... The... Fuck...
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 06:19 PM
Sep 2013

is his fucking malfunction?

The Washington dems have pulled the mask off, they are neocons.

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
5. i dont fucking believe it. next he'll be calling me an american troop hating terroist
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 06:36 PM
Sep 2013

lover
is that you condi?

ellenrr

(3,864 posts)
13. I think Iran is part of the motive but it is too complicated a situation for just one motive...
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 07:53 AM
Sep 2013

For one thing there is the oil pipeline.
"Syria intervention plan fueled by oil interests, not chemical weapon concern
Massacres of civilians are being exploited for narrow geopolitical competition to control Mideast oil, gas pipelines"
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/aug/30/syria-chemical-attack-war-intervention-oil-gas-energy-pipelines

then there is the need to distract us from little facts like that the DEA has billions of phone records on us from 1987.

as far as Iran, this is what Mondoweiss has to say:
"AIPAC comes out for strike on Syria– and mentions Iran more often than Syria.
Why does Obama need AIPAC? Could it be because AIPAC can get 70 Senators’ signatures on a napkin in 24 hours?"
http://mondoweiss.net/2013/09/aipac-comes-out-for-strike-on-syria-and-mentions-iran-more-often-than-syria.html

I think a big factor is that almost every congressperson received big bucks from the weapons industry, and what fun is it to have these toys, if you don't get to use them.

and also, that the US has to be at perpetual war.-- and we have the Iraq and Afghanistan war winding down (for us, not for them).

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
10. How exactly, under international law is this covered, for any nation:
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 08:11 PM
Sep 2013

"not a declaration of war but a declaration of our values to the world."

We get to launch strikes to declare our values to the world? I am not hearing anything about
questioning the evidence, incredible.


This exercise has become a disgraceful embarrassment.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
12. "Evidence"?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 07:44 AM
Sep 2013

> "not a declaration of war but a declaration of our values to the world."

You don't need no stinkin' "evidence" to declare the plutocracy's values to the world!

Get with the programme citizen - Hope & Change is good for you!

Alkene

(752 posts)
14. "...a declaration of our values to the world."
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 08:09 AM
Sep 2013

That's...certainly true, but not in the way Menendez meant it.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
16. the military-industrial-BigOil-complex is licking its chops. "Open the $$ spigot!"
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:43 AM
Sep 2013

They couldn't care less about the clusterfck of factions we'll be supporting including some of our sworn enemies, or the blowback. It's all about selling the arms and supplies and making the big buck$$.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Kerry lobbies Senate on S...