Obama hopes Putin will change mind over Syria
Source: The Irish Times
Wed, Sep 4, 2013, 16:50
President Barack Obama said today he hoped Russian president Vladimir Putin would change his position of opposing military action against military targets in Syria.
Do I hold out hope that Mr Putin may change his position on some of these issues? Im always hopeful, and I will continue to engage him, Mr Obama told a news conference in Sweden.
Mr Obama added he had made appeals directly to Mr Putin on Syria, but so far he had resisted efforts to achieve UN Security Council action.
=snip=
Aides say that even as Mr Obama travels he will stay on top of the congressional debate raging back in Washington, where his national security team has waged an intensive campaign to ease the concerns of reluctant lawmakers and a war-weary American public.
Read more: http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/middle-east/obama-hopes-putin-will-change-mind-over-syria-1.1515907
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)"They lie beautifully, of course. I saw debates in Congress. A congressman asks Mr Kerry: 'Is al Qaeda there?' He says: 'No, I am telling you responsibly that it is not'," Putin said at a meeting of his human rights council in the Kremlin.
"Al Qaeda units are the main military echelon, and they know this," he said, referring to the United States. "It was unpleasant and surprising for me - we talk to them, we proceed from the assumption that they are decent people. But he is lying and knows he is lying. It's sad."
....
In another sign of tension, the Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying that since August 31, the U.S. State Department had repeatedly asked for a telephone call between Kerry and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov but Kerry had been unavailable and declined to set a time for the call.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/04/us-syria-crisis-russia-congress-idUSBRE9830N620130904
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)He was most likely advising the Mossad on what kind of evidence they would need to fabricate.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)What's it to you?
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)You really can't tell? Let me give you a clue:
It was a joke (at least it might have been one). Get it now?
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)If your joke is that Kerry was on the phone with Mossad telling them to manufacture evidence....I don't think it is all that funny.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Tell me one of your favorites.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)They must have invested in a bunch of geiger counters.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)You should reflect on your own advice, Mr. President. Perhaps there is another World leader who might profit from a change of heart? It takes a big man to change his mind and admit he was wrong. Hmmmm?
Turborama
(22,109 posts)So, you think it's President Obama who's wrong about Assad and not Putin? Hmmmm!
DLnyc
(2,479 posts)international agreement at the UN.
Daniel537
(1,560 posts)They agree not to do anything. Fortunately our President disagrees with those corrupt clowns.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)This isn't the BOG, my friend. Disagreeing with the elders here does not draw a death sentence.
Turborama
(22,109 posts)I never visit the Barack Obama Group - not that I have a problem with supporters of President Obama, I just don't have the inclination - so what have they got to do with anything?
Also, who are the "elders" and what have they and a "death sentence" got to do with how President Obama feels about Assad?
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Goodbye for now.
Turborama
(22,109 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Just a couple of old friends (sigh).
Daniel537
(1,560 posts)Nevermind Putin's endless supply of weaponry to Assad, why that's just fine and dandy.
David__77
(23,367 posts)It would be a war that would promote terrorism and insecurity not just for Syrians, but Americans as well. "America" says no to this war.
David__77
(23,367 posts)I sincerely hope he doesn't jump off into the abyss and political destroy his presidency.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)There is still time to stop this thing. The House may give him the perfect excuse to make a U-turn.
Response to Turborama (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
The Magistrate
(95,244 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Putin and Russia have supported a father and son regime in Syria. The father simply slaughtered his opposition quietly. From the link below:
In 1982, Assads father and then-dictator Hafez al-Assad responded to a Muslim Brotherhood-led uprising in the city of Hama by leveling entire neighborhoods. He killed thousands of civilians, many of whom had nothing to do with the uprising.
The next year, Reagan tried to intervene in the Lebanese Civil War, which was said to be part of the Greater Syria move by the father. Israel had tried to set up a buffer zone between itself and those who were lobbing missiles at itself. Iran set up a military base after the Lebanese government fell and still supplies Hezbollah from that base.
We know the results of Reagan's efforts:
A smoke cloud rises from the rubble of the bombed barracks at Beirut International Airport (BIA).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Beirut_barracks_bombing
The Wikipedia page there explains a lot of how we got here today, including Reagan's RWR views. It is worth the read. It is no wonder the GOP and Tea Party is like it is today.
Assad's son is desperate because he is losing the ground war, even the capitol city of Damascus, where this latest chemical attack took place. Deaths were documented by Doctors Without Borders, so there is no 'false flag.'
All the actions detailed below is Assad's response to Syria's Arab Spring, which won't gain him and his supporters much love anywhere.
9 questions about Syria you were too embarrassed to ask
By Max Fisher, August 29, 2013
1. What is Syria?
Syria is a country in the Middle East, along the eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea. Its about the same size as Washington state with a population a little over three times as large 22 million. Syria is very diverse, ethnically and religiously, but most Syrians are ethnic Arab and follow the Sunni branch of Islam. Civilization in Syria goes back thousands of years, but the country as it exists today is very young. Its borders were drawn by European colonial powers in the 1920s.
Syria is in the middle of an extremely violent civil war. Fighting between government forces and rebels has killed more 100,000 and created 2 million refugees, half of them children.
2. Why are people in Syria killing each other?
The killing started in April 2011, when peaceful protests inspired by earlier revolutions in Egypt and Tunisia rose up to challenge the dictatorship running the country. The government responded there is no getting around this like monsters. First, security forces quietly killed activists. Then they started kidnapping, raping, torturing and killing activists and their family members, including a lot of children, dumping their mutilated bodies by the sides of roads. Then troops began simply opening fire on protests. Eventually, civilians started shooting back.
Fighting escalated from there until it was a civil war. Armed civilians organized into rebel groups. The army deployed across the country, shelling and bombing whole neighborhoods and towns, trying to terrorize people into submission. Theyve also allegedly used chemical weapons, which is a big deal for reasons Ill address below. Volunteers from other countries joined the rebels, either because they wanted freedom and democracy for Syria or, more likely, because they are jihadists who hate Syrias secular government. The rebels were gaining ground for a while and now it looks like Assad is coming back. There is no end in sight...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/08/29/9-questions-about-syria-you-were-too-embarrassed-to-ask/
In keeping with the four paragraph limit, here is a summary of some items, but a good read would be helpful. Note the map above which shows just what Assad is facing from the rebel forces.
That's about half the country and he is losing territory. He will use whatever he can to stop the rebels. I am not in favor of seeing what we saw in Egypt, with a new government enforcing religious edicts.
That may end up being done and I'm suspicious of anyone that McCain supports, as I remember Reagan's hearty support of the religious groups that met his standards like Rand Paul has.
And then Bush supporting Taliban forces initially before September 11th. Reagan encouraged the fall of the Afghan regime to give the Russians their own taste of Vietnam in supporting what allegedly was secular government.
A good read of the article here might explain how Obama can, in private so that everyone saves face:
UN Chemical Weapons Convention
The Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) is an arms control agreement which outlaws the production, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons. Its full name is the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction. The agreement is administered by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), which is an independent organization based in the Hague, in the Netherlands.
The main obligation under the convention is the prohibition of use and production of chemical weapons, as well as the destruction of all chemical weapons. The destruction activities are verified by the OPCW. As of January 2013, around 78% of the (declared) stockpile of chemical weapons has thus been destroyed.[5][6] The convention also has provisions for systematic evaluation of chemical and military plants, as well as for investigations of allegations of use and production of chemical weapons based on intelligence of other state parties...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_Weapons_Convention
Please note that the USA and Russia are making signifigance progress in eliminatind their national stockpiles. And that Syria is not a signatory to the agreement. But the vast majority of the world is.
cqo_000
(313 posts)MOSCOW President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday warned the United States and its allies against launching a unilateral military strike against Damascus, saying the Wests case against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad doesnt stand up to scrutiny.
In an interview published Wednesday by the Associated Press, Putin said Russia is developing a plan of action in case the United States does attack Syria without United Nations approval, but he declined to go into specifics.
Putin said that if the United States and its allies could provide sufficient evidence that Assads forces carried out a chemical weapons attack on Aug. 21 in a Damascus suburb, Russia would consider allowing United Nations action against Syria.
It ought to be convincing, Putin said. It shouldnt be based on some rumors and information obtained by the special services through some kind of eavesdropping, some conversations and things like that.
Read More: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/putin-warns-us-not-to-strike-syria-dismisses-case-against-assad-as-rumors/2013/09/04/dbcf3396-154f-11e3-961c-f22d3aaf19ab_story.html
doc03
(35,324 posts)Mysterysouppe
(68 posts)over at Wonkette. It really is an endearing quality, one among many. But then there is also another side, largely hidden from us, which emerges, for example, in his determination to attack Syria.