Report: Senate Democrats Would Block Larry Summers From Fed Chair
Source: Breaking News Usa
Report: Senate Democrats Would Block Larry Summers From Fed Chair
By Breaking News USA | 05 September 2013 8:33 pm EST Updated 5 September 2013 8:33 pm EST
Topics: Federal Reserve, Larry Summers, US Senate
Three Senate Democrats are prepared to oppose Larry Summers if he is nominated for chairman of the Federal Reserve.
The Wall Street Journal reports that Sens. Jeff Merkley, Sherrod Brown and Elizabeth Warren are prepared to vote no on Summers in the Senate Banking Committee if he is nominated by President Obama.
If the Democrats stick to their guns, Summers would need support from Republicans in order to get a full vote in the U.S. Senate.
Summers cozy ties to Wall Street have raised concerns among progressives and Democrats, though the Obama administration appears inclined to support his nomination.
Read more: http://breakingnewsusa.com/2013/09/report-senate-democrats-block-larry-summers-fed-chair/
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323893004579057462649587846.html
antigop
(12,778 posts)SharonAnn
(13,772 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,369 posts)Probably not the best thing for Larry. Not sure if the President wants to spend the next two months brawling with his own party.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)that Obama wants this POS.
Left Coast2020
(2,397 posts)..on anything significant in past few years.
Not sure I want to put my money on a long-shot to win, place or show.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)and they can take the House, Senate and White House!
KoKo
(84,711 posts)riled up that Summers could go down!
He's not the PICK to replace Bernanke... HE IS NOT!
Oh that WISER HEADS could prevail.
K&R!
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)"If the Democrats stick to their guns, Summers would need support from Republicans"
Please proceed!
polichick
(37,152 posts)fujiyama
(15,185 posts)and he seems to have squandered any political capital. I mean, he never had any with republicans, but why actively drive away the people that supported you?
It's so obvious we mean nothing, other than a donor base and a vote. Then what? I mean, yes we saw unaccountable bailouts, the abandoning of the public option, a mediocre stimulus - but we also knew that he had to deal with a very uncooperative congress. But this is term two...And what do we get? First it was the NSA, then Syria, now this. I want to say I'd be surprised if they try to shove Summers into this role, without Senate Democratic support, but after the last few months...
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)...better start getting REALLY concerned about their own political future. Best course is for Dems is to vigorously oppose Obama's embrace of Bushism. Liberals/Progressives simply aren't going to vote for any Dem supporting Syrian War, NSA spying, Summers, Chained CPI, or TPP. Obama is trying to drag the Party so far right, that voting the lesser of two evils will no longer apply....it will be two equal evils.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Fortunately there will be plenty of room to run to the left of him in 2014. Heck they'll be able to do it and still be centrist (not that that would be my preference).
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Dems better start distancing themselves from RW Obama real soon, or they're going to be carrying a bad brand.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)followed by dumping Summers, and reining in the NSA...and the CIA...and the MIC and....
I know. I want to shoot the moon. But I think some of it is within reach and any of it would help.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)gopiscrap
(23,757 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)But if the Republicans can get over their hate of Obama more than their love of money, Summers will get it. Served up by Obama on a silver platter.
dflprincess
(28,075 posts)I've been disappointed so often in the past I fear getting my hopes up.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)They are not "Obama's new buddies".
More like old friends.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)of referring to the factions as Republicans and Democrats. The Powers To Be (The Carlyle Group) dont make the distinction. Politicians are either on the side of the PTB or not. We know which side Summers is on.
Triana
(22,666 posts)lyonn
(6,064 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)But we need more to step up to really seal the deal.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)Good for you!
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)I mean, Warren, Brown.. And my senator? That's a pretty sweet feeling. I was a Novick supporter initially, but I have never been so happy with the result of a loss.
MsPithy
(809 posts)"Fucking retarded!"
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)YET. I'm still waiting.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)to Stop that Scum Summers from being Anointed!
We Can Dream...but, reality is that ...Obama feels comfortable with him and therefore....HE IS THE ONE...
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...the man could obviously use some rest.
- And a hanky......
K&R
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)You all bore me - now let me go back to dreaming of controlling the wealth of the 1% -drool drool.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)Kablooie
(18,628 posts)Paula Sims
(877 posts)Ferguson knew the insiders and outsiders, he believed in regulation, he believed. . .Oh yea, there was that issue of skin color. . .
I say go with Ferguson (if he'd come back -- BIG IF. . .)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_W._Ferguson,_Jr.
villager
(26,001 posts)Or rather, an Executive Branch out of touch with anyone outside the 1%, or their acolytes...
otis252
(4 posts)We all need to send our opinions.
WCLinolVir
(951 posts)tblue37
(65,336 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)eridani
(51,907 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)World War, and THREE senators might oppose his nomination to one of the most powerful positions in the world.
What a great democracy we live in.
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)This guy needs to be run out of town on a rail...A sad excuse for a human being.....
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Fuckin'
[font size=8]HOO![/FONT]