SeaWorld to cut hours for part-time workers, avoiding health-insurance law
Source: Orlando Sentinel
SeaWorld Entertainment Inc. is reducing hours for thousands of part-time workers, a move that should allow the Orlando-based theme-park owner to avoid offering those employees medical insurance under the federal government's health-care overhaul.
SeaWorld confirmed the move Monday in a brief written statement to the Orlando Sentinel. The company operates 11 theme parks across the United States and has approximately 22,000 employees — nearly 18,000 of whom are part-time or seasonal workers. It has more than 4,000 part-time and seasonal workers just in Central Florida.
SeaWorld will no longer allow part-time employees to work more than 28 hours a week, down from a previous cap of 32 hours per week.
That's significant because it should prevent those employees from being classified as full-time workers under the Affordable Care Act, the health-care overhaul championed by President Barack Obama and passed by Congress in 2010.
Read more: http://www.orlandosentinel.com/business/os-seaworld-part-time-workers-hours-20130909,0,6129525.story
There are already plenty of reasons why SeaWorld should be on your sh** list (as a political science professor of mine says). Recently, OSHA fined SeaWorld over a safety violation and labeled the park a "repeat offender". And don't forget Dawn Brancheau.
= new reply since forum marked as read
And SeaWorld can go to hell!!
With implementation of the Affordable Care Act inching closer by the day, there’s been a slow but steady stream of employers claiming that the law is forcing them to cut back workers’ hours and rely more heavily on part-time employees. But for all the talk, very few companies have actually cut hours because of Obamacare, according to a new analysis by the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).
Obamacare requires firms that have 50 or more employees to provide a minimum level of health coverage to their full-time workers — defined as those who work 30 hours or more per week — or pay a $2,000 per employee fine after the first 30 workers. Since the overwhelming majority of companies that size already offer health care benefits, the provision only affects about 10,000 firms. Nonetheless, reform critics have latched onto the narrative that the requirement is a job-killer, citing the example of retail and service sector companies like Regal Theaters that are cutting back hours to avoid paying for workers’ health care benefits.
The CEPR report shows that to be a minority position among larger employers. Since 30 hours per week is the threshold for employees receiving benefits under the law, researchers expected companies that didn’t want to comply with Obamacare to roll back workers’ hours to just below that threshold. But only about 0.6 percent of the labor force worked between 26 and 29 hours per week in 2013. Since 2012, the number of part-time employees working that range of hours actually stayed statistically the same. Furthermore, less than a third of workers say they are working less than 30 hours because of an employers’ decision — most choose to work the limited number of hours. That led the authors to conclude that the trend “is in the wrong direction for the ACA as job-killer story.”
“While there may certainly be instances of individual employers carrying through with threats to reduce their employees’ hours to below 30 to avoid the sanctions in the ACA, the numbers are too small to show up in the data,” the CEPR researchers write. “It appears that in setting worker hours employers are responding to business considerations in much the same way as they did before the ACA took effect.”
More:
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/07/25/2353201/few-employers-cut-workers-hours-because-of-obamacare/
Also:
Obamacare Isn't Causing Employers To Cut Worker Hours: White House
...
In May, a poll conducted by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans, an organization of human-resources professionals, showed that despite concerns about rising health-care costs, more than two-thirds of companies definitely plan to offer health benefits to full-time employees. The same poll found that only 0.5 percent of companies said they would definitely discontinue health benefits.
...
More:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/06/obamacare-worker-hours_n_3882403.html
I imagine the corollary is true also-- "I'm sure insurance is comforting to someone who was just denied by treatment by their insurer..."
Six of one half a dozen of the other, yes?
(Insert distinction without a difference here)
This wouldn't happen under single-payer...
