Attorney Mark O'Mara drops George Zimmerman
Source: CNN
Mark O'Mara, the attorney who successfully defended George Zimmerman in his second-degree murder trial this year, will no longer represent his notorious client.
"I am not representing George Zimmerman in his recent domestic altercation case or his impending divorce case," O'Mara told CNN.
Although Zimmerman's murder trial is over, his legal battles are far from over.
On Monday, Zimmerman was briefly detained after a dispute involving his estranged wife, Shellie, and her father, David Bryant Dean.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/10/justice/zimmerman-lawyer/
WHY??? You guys all made such a a great group...
Get it here -> http://www.zazzle.com/youre_not_in_the_1_why_vote_like_you_are_bumpe_bumper_sticker-128479630785214922?rf=238107662556833486
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and whatever he does have left...Shellie is going to get half of that...
gopiscrap
(23,726 posts)Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)doesn't do divorce or DV cases.
tavalon
(27,985 posts)You'd think the stench would have clued him in.
Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)....
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)NickB79
(19,224 posts)O'mara would hold his nose to any stench coming off of him and dive right in.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)pinched nez look - but, i thought it was genetics.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Divine Discontent
(21,056 posts)gopiscrap
(23,726 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Maybe I should say especially George Zimmerman.
The idea of our justice system is that each side in a case gets the most vigorous representation possible within the law and the facts. The goal is for the court -- the judge and jury -- to determine the truth and the legal outcome of the case after weighing both sides. It only works if the attorneys on both sides vigorously represent their client and their case. I'm not sure that the prosecutors did their job well in the Zimmerman/Martin case. Seems to me they should have made a greater effort to try to keep Zimmerman's self-serving statements to the police out of the evidence and also tried to prevent the jury from viewing the case as a Stand Your Ground case. I don't think the facts presented a Stand Your Ground case at all. But that is my opinion, and I was not in the courtroom. I seriously doubt that Zimmerman's stories would have held up under serious cross-examination.
But Zimmerman will seek out his own punishment. That's how these things work very often. Not always, but very often.
gopiscrap
(23,726 posts)can't be a legal analyst and be taken seriously discussing a case your representing, now can we? What a fucking douche bag! Not because he dropped Zimmy but because he defended him in the first place.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Even scumbags are entitled to representation in court.
If you want to be pissed at someone over the outcome of that trial, why not focus on the prosecutors who threw it?
wild bird
(421 posts)the prosecutors who didn't even put on a good case, not O'Mara, who did what he was supposed to do, provide the best defense possible for his client.
Thank you for a reasonable voice in this thread.
gopiscrap
(23,726 posts)but if I was an attorney (and I went to law school and worked on all sorts of legal stuff) the only way I would represent a guy like Zimmy is if the court ordered me to do so.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)"It's a dirty job but
"
I interact a lot with lawyers & understand something of their situation, but I couldn't do what they do. As a frequent expert witness, I see it as my job to provide the best information I can to the court so it can make better decisions. Lawyers engage me to give opinions I then use me if they think what I have to say will advance their case, and don't use me if they think otherwise. I'm free to turn down cases if they don't suit me, and to give opinions that don't advance the case of the lawyer's clients. This results in 2 things--First, I preserve my credibility & personal integrity, and second, lawyers with really shitty cases go somewhere else if they want to buy an expert opinion.
gopiscrap
(23,726 posts)would have run from that case no matter how lucrative!
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)They don't always have much choice.
gopiscrap
(23,726 posts)have to accept those kinds of cases going into the job...O'Mara on the other hand is a private attorney and IMHO an opportunistic scumbag, he didn't have to accept the case.
gopiscrap
(23,726 posts)Been all over (up Lake MI, central and western WI) and found the folks to be warm and friendly.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Well, it's not like I've even watched CNN since the 90s, anyway...
Little Star
(17,055 posts)Loki
(3,825 posts)the blood still stains your hands, and it won't wash away.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)wild bird
(421 posts)And everyone here, despite the foul attitudes and words towards O'Mara, would want him or a lawyer just like him if they were in the same predicament, for whatever reason.
He did exactly what a defense lawyer is supposed to do, give his client the best defense possible, if he hadn't, he would have faced a review before the Bar Association and possibly had his license suspended or revoked.
I guess that old saying applies, everyone hates lawyers, that is, until they need one, and if I needed one, I would hope I got one just like O'Mara.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)Some of the postings I'm reading here are almost unbelieveable.
O'Mara did exactly what he was supposed to do, and George Zimmerman was entitled to a defense. Like it or not, that's the way the system works, and (as you indicate) any one here would expect, dare I say DEMAND, the same thing were they in such a predicament.
It is ludicrous to blame O'Mara for doing his job well. It is also ludicrous to blame the jurors, who ruled on the evidence presented NOT necessarily what was played on television.
O'Mara has probably realized that he's no longer able to control the actions of his client, and is trying to distance himself from Zimmerman. When clients do not take the advise given them by their attorneys, it becomes harder and harder for the attorney to do his/her job.
robinlynne
(15,481 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)worked on divorce cases. He was not asked nor did he clarify if that was in the past or not.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Fortunately, there just aren't enough murders to support them as a class. Instead, you have these general-purpose attorneys who do whatever cases come their way. True, some specialize in "family law" (divorces) and others in criminal law and still others in tort law, but there are still a lot of generalists who pretty much do it all.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)shenmue
(38,506 posts)I wonder who he'll hire next. It isn't going to be an easy ride for the next person.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Because Georgie, The KILLER, is a stoopid-fuck-trash-scumbag?
Maybe?
Oh...where is that Juror Number ?, that was just gushing over Georgie? Let's get a statement!
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Despicable man. Racist and disgusting!!!
gopiscrap
(23,726 posts)wild bird
(421 posts)Provide the best possible defense possible for his client.
I watched the whole trial, from opening arguments to the verdict being read, I didn't see any racism from either side, what I saw was a DA's team that seemed to be way out of their league and a defense that had their shit together.
And I'm no apologist for GZ, he's a man who got away with murder and will self destruct in the future, hopefully without taking anyone with him.
If you were in the same position as GZ was, whether your were innocent or guilty, you would want a lawyer exactly like O'Mara, despite what you may think of him.
The old saying applies, everyone hates lawyers, until you need one.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)he is a scum bucket. He can be all those things at the same time.
wild bird
(421 posts)Because he got GZ off? Does that make every lawyer who gets their clients off, even if it's obvious that their guilty, scum buckets?
So if you were in the same predicament as GZ was, whether you were innocent or guilty, wouldn't you want a lawyer like O'Mara?
I know I damn sure would.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)in front of the media and damned the Martin family, demonized Trayvon, dismissed the influence of race, painted his client as the victim, didn't even acknowledge the fact that a child was murdered; refused to even acknowledge these parents. Instead, he suggested that somehow the parents were responsible for turning the entire case into a political fiasco, etc.
That's what scum buckets do.
We can agree to disagree, but in my view, Mark O'Mara is a scum bucket. He's a disgusting person.
wild bird
(421 posts)of GZ.
By the way, he can't acknowledge the fact that a child was murdered, that would be admitting that his client was guilty of murder and would probably land him in front of the Bar Association for a hearing.
erpowers
(9,350 posts)Mark O' Mara is still Zimmerman's lawyer. He is just not representing him in his case against his wife. O' Mara is still representing Zimmerman in numerous cases.
gvstn
(2,805 posts)O'Mara said he spent a year getting to know the Zimmermann's as a family. It would be a bad idea for him now to represent George against his wife, since they were all on the same side up until a month ago. He will still represent George on any civil cases (assumming he gets paid).
treestar
(82,383 posts)If you are involved with a family, stay away from any divorce. By that time you have loyalty to both parties.
There are plenty of lawyers. Let them get someone else rather than have a conflict of interest. That's the ethical thing to do.
TeamPooka
(24,207 posts)That's cute.
dawn frenzy adams
(429 posts)Please email CNN and complain about the hiring of O'mara. This is a man that used slander in a revolting way, to vilify a 17 year-old.
dmr
(28,344 posts)From the article:
O'Mara, now a legal analyst for CNN, continues to be the attorney of record in the impending defamation lawsuit against NBC; Pennsylvania attorney Jim Beasley will be the lead attorney on the case.
He will also still be involved with outstanding sanction motions and recovery of costs from the state of Florida for expenses related to Zimmerman's murder trial.
It does look like he's washed his hands of Zimmerman as best as he can.
Guess he's hanging on for a hopeful payout from NBC; and the sanctions are just housekeeping issues he'll assign to someone in his office.
For the rest of his life and my life - he is connected to Zimmerman. His behavior after the verdict well .. . There ain't no takesy backsey.
tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)in a bad way.
Keep safe, anyone who lives near this guy.
Skittles
(153,111 posts)and NOW he runs away because he doesn't want to see the results - he is as big a lying coward as his client
CTyankee
(63,889 posts)this lawyer just figures the show is over and Zim can't gin up the money to pay his fee, so it's bye bye to him...I LOVE IT!
It's all crap. They got nothin'.