Pay Gap Between 1 Percent And Everybody Else Reaches Record
Source: AP
WASHINGTON The income gap between the richest 1 percent and the rest of America last year reached the widest point since the Roaring Twenties. The top 1 percent of U.S. earners collected 19.3 percent of household income in 2012, their largest share since 1928. And the share held by the top 10 percent of earners last year reached a record 48.2 percent.
U.S. income inequality has been growing for almost three decades. But it grew again last year, according to an analysis of IRS figures dating to 1913 by economists at the University of California, Berkeley, the Paris School of Economics and Oxford University.
Last year, the incomes of the top 1 percent rose nearly 20 percent compared with a 1 percent increase for the remaining 99 percent.
But since the recession officially ended in June 2009, the top 1 percent have enjoyed the benefits of rising corporate profits and stock prices: 95 percent of the income gains reported since 2009 have gone to the top 1 percent.
That compares with a 45 percent share for the top 1 percent in the economic expansion of the 1990s and a 65 percent share from the expansion that followed the 2001 recession. The top 10 percent haven't done badly, either. Last year, they captured 48.2 percent of income, up from the previous record, 46.6 percent, in 2011.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/10/pay-gap-between-1-percent_n_3900373.html
AnotherDreamWeaver
(2,850 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)The "19.3 percent of household income" sounds low to me. The Koch brothers alone made ~ $30,000 for every man, woman and child in the country.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,307 posts)$30,000 * 310 million = $9,300 billion = $9.3 trillion
I think you've misplaced a decimal point. I don't believe their income in one year was $9.3 trillion.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Thanks for the correction.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)The 1% have no incentive to stop.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)The farther it goes, the poorer are the poor.
When the poor will do ANYTHING for a day's bread, you've got slavery back.
And that's been the point from the start.
"The comfort of the rich depends on an abundant supply of the poor." -- Voltaire
indepat
(20,899 posts)major branches of government. Now someone please tell me a coup has not occurred.
progressoid
(49,978 posts)Good thing we bailed them out.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)We knew it was coming, but it is a sad day.
Coolidge - followed by Herbert Hoover - and their republican congresses created this disparity with low taxes, weak regulations, high tariffs, restrictive immigration and weak unions. Low taxes along weak regulations and unions are true again today - perhaps why we have broken an 84-year-old record.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Something tells me the worst is yet to come. Very low taxes on rich and weak regulations always lead to great income disparity and bubble economics.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)I doubt any of them actually believe it.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Brigid
(17,621 posts)Fasten your seat belts, everybody -- it's going to be a very bumpy ride.
Kingofalldems
(38,451 posts)durablend
(7,460 posts)Don't kid yourself thinking otherwise!
Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)Thanks for the thread, ErikJ.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)My suggestions to remove some of the workload that only tangentially belongs to the app for which I am now the only developer fell on totally deaf ears. My manager barely acknowledged that everything is going to take longer. I'm expecting that come review time, this will be totally ignored. So in the meantime, careful logging of hours, bite my tongue and hope they don't ask for reviews of managers until after I get my review done.
RDANGELO
(3,433 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)olddad56
(5,732 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)and think they were lied to when one of the presidential candidates in 2008 promised CHANGE.
Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)Response to ErikJ (Original post)
Bob Jones This message was self-deleted by its author.