Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,511 posts)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 05:39 PM Sep 2013

Rage at the machines: Board of Election’s old lever devices cause multiple problems during primary

Source: NY Daily News

The Board of Election’s ancient lever machines Tuesday caused a host of retro headaches for voters across the city, including at least two of the mayoral candidates.

At Congregation Mt. Sinai in Brooklyn Heights, Republican Joe Lhota was forced to vote by paper ballot because the machines there wouldn’t function.

And at Baruch College in Manhattan, the voter rolls had no record of Democrat Anthony Weiner’s signature — a screwup that postponed his voting for an hour.

The board chose to use the old-timey machines with the big metal levers instead of high-tech scanners used last year because they say they won’t be able to switch over the scanners in time for what’s expected to be an Oct. 1 runoff election.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/election/old-machines-major-primary-pains-article-1.1451145

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rage at the machines: Board of Election’s old lever devices cause multiple problems during primary (Original Post) brooklynite Sep 2013 OP
High Tech Scanners? Snake Plissken Sep 2013 #1
That's not the real problem... brooklynite Sep 2013 #4
Carlos Danger votes in Manhattan? KamaAina Sep 2013 #2
I think they moved. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #6
Check out the first sentence. Anything not make sense? Wilms Sep 2013 #3
What an IRONY... brooklynite Sep 2013 #5
No problem with paper. Wilms Sep 2013 #7

Snake Plissken

(4,103 posts)
1. High Tech Scanners?
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 05:44 PM
Sep 2013

'because they say they won’t be able to switch over the scanners in time for what’s expected to be an Oct. 1 runoff election.'

When were these scanners built, in the 1970s?

brooklynite

(94,511 posts)
4. That's not the real problem...
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 05:58 PM
Sep 2013

It's that, if the margin between prospective candidates for the runoff (in three weeks), is too small, they would have to recount the scanned paper ballots by hand...something it's apparently difficult for their crack staff to do.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
3. Check out the first sentence. Anything not make sense?
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 05:53 PM
Sep 2013

Seems the voter roll had no record of Weiner. So the author blames the lever machine.

And yes, Lhota had to use a paper ballot. What a "headache" that would NEVER occur with an electronic voting machine.

I'll be on my fainting couch.

brooklynite

(94,511 posts)
5. What an IRONY...
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 06:00 PM
Sep 2013

...that the paper ballots the BOE was trying to avoid led them to use the lever machines, which are breaking down citywide, requiring people to use paper ballots.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rage at the machines: Boa...