Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 08:04 PM Sep 2013

(Ariz. Supreme) Court: Republican-backed judge nomination law unconsitutional

Source: Associated Press

The Arizona Supreme Court ruled Friday that a new state law changing the nominating process for appeals court judges is unconstitutional because it makes a fundamental change in the balance of power between a voter-approved nominating commission and the governor.

The high court said in its ruling that the law directly conflicts with the state Constitution and cannot be enforced.

Gov. Jan Brewer signed House Bill 2600 in April. The bill sponsored by Republican Rep. Justin Pierce of Mesa increased the minimum number of nominees for each appellate court vacancy to five from the current constitutional requirement of three. The changes affected a 1974 voter-approved constitutional amendment establishing judicial merit selection and setting up the Commission on Appellate Court Appointments to vet candidates and recommend them to the governor.

... The law was the latest attempt by Republicans to change the state’s voter-approved merit selection process.


Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/free/20130913arizona-judge-nomination-law-struck-down.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(Ariz. Supreme) Court: Republican-backed judge nomination law unconsitutional (Original Post) Newsjock Sep 2013 OP
Good gopiscrap Sep 2013 #1
A law put in place by a Republican and written by Republicans is unconstutional? zbdent Sep 2013 #2
SOP. nt silvershadow Sep 2013 #3
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»(Ariz. Supreme) Court: Re...