Federal government to seize NYC skyscraper tied to Iran
Source: USA Today
It was once known as the Piaget Building because the Swiss jeweler used to have offices in the skyscraper near Rockefeller Center.
In the near future, it will be known as property of the federal government.
U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest has granted a summary judgment that clears the way for the government to seize the 36-story office building owned by a corporation and foundation with ties to the Iranian government. The move is the latest chapter in a short but storied history that includes design by John Carl Warnecke, the same architect who drew up the John F. Kennedy Eternal Flame gravesite at Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia, Logan International Airport in Boston and the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md.
A statement by the U.S. Justice Department says the ruling "paves the way for the largest-ever terrorism-related forfeiture."
Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/09/17/fifth-avenue-skyscraper-iran-government-seizure/2829517/
delrem
(9,688 posts)How do I distinguish from "the spoils of war"?
Perhaps this is just a "shot across the bow" warning to any nation in the Central and South Americas, and to any nation across the globe vulnerable to a US hit, that they'd better pay up the bounty. Their (cheap!) price for living under the protection of American Exceptionalism.
Who'd want to speculate like *that*? I wouldn't own up to such a speculation because it's clearly "CT"
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)If we were truly concerned about terrorist-owned properties in NYC, we should find out...
JustAnotherGen
(31,816 posts)Programs in place against Saudi Arabia. Not saying there should or shouldn't be - just stating it.
Pretty extensive list from the Secretary of Treasury office on Iran.
http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/pages/iran.aspx
I wonder if the tip off was the OFAC list - or the BIS list?
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,816 posts)Which list yet though. . . I monitor OFAC and BIS hits for my company (Telecom). It's got to be someone ON the listed (an individual) who is connect from a banking concern to that property. It's the only thing I can think of.
Rain Mcloud
(812 posts)"U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest has granted a summary judgment that clears the way for the government to seize the 36-story office building owned by a corporation and foundation with ties to the Iranian government."
Could it be an Oil Company? Haliburton?
[link:http://www.projectcensored.org/2-halliburton-charged-with-selling-nuclear-technologies-to-iran/|
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)christx30
(6,241 posts)against the indefinite detention clause in the NDAA. The ruling she was forced to vacate due to presidential pressure.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)There's no doubt that kind of even-handed outreach should make the Iranians more open to negotiations over their nuclear research activities. Way to go Judge. (sigh)
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)ConcernedCanuk
(13,509 posts).
.
.
Iran is watching closely - USA sanctioned the shit out of Iraq, Iraq got rid of whatever weapons were upsetting the USA,
USA INVADED AND SLAUGHTERED THEM ANYHOW!!
Sad times we are living in.
(sigh)
CC
Nihil
(13,508 posts)> Iran is watching closely - USA sanctioned the shit out of Iraq,
> Iraq got rid of whatever weapons were upsetting the USA,
> USA INVADED AND SLAUGHTERED THEM ANYHOW!!
The fact that most of the US public has an attention-span of a drunken gnat
does not imply that people elsewhere in the world (especially those who have
been previously designated members of the fictional "Axis of Evil" have got
the same failing.
MADem
(135,425 posts)The embassy was designed in 1948 by the architect Ides van der Gracht. It was a long, low two-story brick building, similar to American high schools built in the 1930s and 1940s. For this reason, the building was nicknamed "Henderson High" by the embassy staff, referring to Loy W. Henderson, who became America's ambassador to Iran just after construction was completed in 1951.[1]
The US diplomatic mission has been defunct since the Iran hostage crisis of 1979. Since then, the United States government has been represented in Iran by the United States Interests Section of the Embassy of Switzerland in Tehran. The name currently given to the compound by many Iranians is variously translated as "espionage den," "den of espionage", and "nest of spies".[2]
After the fall of the embassy, Revolutionary Guard used it as a training center. The brick walls that form the perimeter (the embassy grounds are the size of a city block) feature a number of anti-American murals commissioned by the government of Iran.[citation needed] The site has also housed a bookstore and a museum (both are closed to foreigners and the general Iranian public, though exceptions do exist). The Great Seal of the United States is badly damaged but still visible at the entryway.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embassy_of_the_United_States,_Tehran
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)We steal their skyscrapers.
MADem
(135,425 posts)It's not just a few murals on the walls, they've turned it into a training camp.
Their embassy, OTOH, as well as their other diplomatic buildings in Washington, DC, are being maintained against the day that we renew relations by OUR State Department. In fact, State recently repaired the blue dome atop the embassy. The place looks pristine--it's turnkey ready.
It's a distinction and a difference.
You also might try reading the article a bit more closely. This is all about SANCTIONS. The skyscraper isn't owned by "them." Them, being the Islamic Government of Iran.
It's owned by a corporation with TIES to that government--i.e., a corporation that violated sanction laws by turning cash over to a corporation that is a front for BANK MELLI (which is the Iranian National Bank). They were LAUNDERING MONEY for the IGOI out of that place.
The Alawi foundation did this knowingly--that's why they're getting nailed. They call themselves a nonprofit but they were funneling proceeds and profits to Assa, the shell for Bank Melli, back to the IGOI.
From the article:
Here--read and learn:
http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/09/17/61204.htm
Judge Forrest described Alavi's assertions it didn't know and that it "lost track of Bank Melli's previously clear control of Assa" as "implausible."
"The government argues that Alavi asserts a sort of collective amnesia," she wrote. "The court finds the analogy apt and its reality implausible. No rational juror could believe in such extraordinary amnesia; many of the same Alavi board members who were indisputably involved in the creation of Assa as a front for Bank Melli in 1989 remained with, or returned to positions with, Alavi after the ITRs were instituted in 1995," the judge wrote.
Forrest also said no evidence indicates that the ultimate owner and beneficiary of Assa was anyone other than Bank Melli. "Similarly, there is no triable issue as to Alavi's knowledge that it knew or was willfully blind as to whether the Iranian government owned and controlled Assa."
Alavi argued that, even if Assa's interest is forfeitable, that Alavi did not itself make any international transfers and thus cannot forfeit its interest.
But the judge disagreed, finding that it is "irrelevant" that Alavi only transferred funds to Assa Corp. within the United States.
Forrest said all assets at issue in the litigation, with the exception of seven properties held in the name of the Alavi Foundation, but bought before 1995, are subject to forfeiture.
Alavi "knew that its transfer of assets from the 650 Fifth Ave. Co. to Assa Corp. was for the purpose of making an international transfer to Assa Co. Ltd. That would further the violation of IEEPA."
I used to do business with Bank Melli in the seventies--I certainly didn't "forget" that. And I didn't do business with them in the millions, either. I got a few rials at one of their Teheran branches on occasion. But it never slipped my mind.
Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)What is your point exactly? Are you suggesting that the Iranian people are dogs, or insects?
MADem
(135,425 posts)You just hung it all out there, didn't ya? So smug! So wrong!
And what you're trying to do is goad and bait by making false and phony inferences about me, on the lines of "When did you stop beating your children?"
It's very uncivil conduct. It's rude and it is disruptive, and it makes DU suck.
And a great big Alla'e shoma khube to you, too, there Skippy....you'll have to work a little bit harder to get a rise out of me with those kinds of amateurish and obvious tactics.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)I'm come to expect this kind of thing from you.
Have a great day.
MADem
(135,425 posts)You apparently have learned nothing from your "interactions." I guess I'll have to look out for misrepresentations, deliberate misinterpretations, and "this kind of thing" from you if I come across you in future.
Besalamat and khoda hafez, y'all!
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)I don't speak Farsi, if that is what you're implying, but the same right back at ya.
MADem
(135,425 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,816 posts)12/17/2008
Page Content
The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN list:
ASSA CO. LTD., 6 Britania Place, Bath Street, St. Helier JE2 4SU, Jersey [NPWMD]
ASSA CORP. (a.k.a. ASSA), New York, NY; Tax ID No. 1368932 (United States) [NPWMD
The Alavi foundation is essentially a front for the Iranian government. And as I understand it - has been since 1979 - and was prior to 1979.
And thank you for your insight.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)We've been terrorizing Iran since 1953. That racist lobby and our corrupt politicians have been pushing war against Iran for years. They may never get it, but our politicians still act tough and pretend that the Iranians are the bad guys.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Stealing their stuff.
Our asset forfeiture laws amount to legalized theft.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)601 Lexington? 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza? 1 Bryant Park? Or 200 West Street?