Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,874 posts)
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 07:11 PM Sep 2013

Obama asks high court to review contraception mandate ruling

Source: Reuters

By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON | Thu Sep 19, 2013 6:06pm EDT

(Reuters) - The Obama administration on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to review the legality of a politically volatile provision of the 2010 federal healthcare law requiring employers to provide health insurance that covers birth control.

The administration wants the high court to reverse a June decision by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver favoring arts and crafts retailer Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. That decision said for-profit companies can sometimes assert religious rights if they do not wish to comply with a federal regulation.

Separately, a Christian legal group called the Alliance Defending Freedom filed a petition on Thursday seeking review of a different appeals court ruling in which the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ruled against the employer.

The group filed on behalf of a Mennonite-owned company in Pennsylvania, Conestoga Wood Specialties.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/19/us-usa-courts-contraception-idUSBRE98I15N20130919

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama asks high court to review contraception mandate ruling (Original Post) Eugene Sep 2013 OP
Fuck the religion-based companies. Koko Ware Sep 2013 #1
hobby lobby...where everything is on sale after the first day! madrchsod Sep 2013 #2
How long will their female employees be employed HockeyMom Sep 2013 #3
What is Hobby Lobby's owner's religion? lupulin Sep 2013 #4
this is Obama's golden year ... quadrature Sep 2013 #5
"this is Obama's golden year ..." greiner3 Sep 2013 #6
it will be interesting what Scalia says booley Sep 2013 #7
 

Koko Ware

(107 posts)
1. Fuck the religion-based companies.
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 07:21 PM
Sep 2013

If they don't want to help women, then they should not bother to do business. I'd like to see the misogynist companies who opposes ACA shut down.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
2. hobby lobby...where everything is on sale after the first day!
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 07:55 PM
Sep 2013

used to spend a lot of money at hobby lobby because it was cheap to buy stuff. my wife and i got out of the party business just in time.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
3. How long will their female employees be employed
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 08:07 PM
Sep 2013

if they keep popping out a baby every two years according to their EMPLOYER'S religion? They have on site day care for all these babies of their female employees who don't use BC? Nevermind, are all their employees the same religion, or even KNOW what their employer's religion is.

lupulin

(58 posts)
4. What is Hobby Lobby's owner's religion?
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 10:30 PM
Sep 2013

Does it really mandate a child every 2 years? Are there age caps on that?

 

quadrature

(2,049 posts)
5. this is Obama's golden year ...
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 11:28 PM
Sep 2013

of his second term.

and he is spending it bickering over
a benefit that could be provided
for chump change if sent to a
contractor like Planned-Parenthood

 

greiner3

(5,214 posts)
6. "this is Obama's golden year ..."
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 08:40 AM
Sep 2013

WTF????????????

"...bickering over a benefit..."

WTF????????????

"...chump change..."

WTF????????????

"...contractor like Planned-Parenthood..."

WTF????????????

WTF????????????

Your Post...

WTF????????????

booley

(3,855 posts)
7. it will be interesting what Scalia says
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:06 PM
Sep 2013

considering he said that religion does not mean one can ignore federal regulations.

Will he hold true to his own words.

Though it bugs me that I see few mention what to me is the obvious.

These are benefits that employees get for WORKING. Why should they get less of a say then the employer who isn't the one who decides when and if contraception is used?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama asks high court to ...