Booting Up: New NSA Data Farm Takes Root In Utah...
Source: NPR
[font size="1"]The National Security Agency says its massive new data center near Salt Lake City will enhance the agency's ability to analyze the email, text message, cellphone and landline metadata it collects.[/font]
The National Security Agency won't say exactly when it will fully rev up its newest and biggest data farm in the Salt Lake City suburb of Bluffdale, Utah... ...But, according to NSA spokeswoman Vanee' Vines, "We turn each machine on as it is installed, and the facility is ready for that installation to begin." Those machines are computer servers enough to fill four warehouse-size "data halls" covering 100,000 square feet.
...More than 1 million additional square feet here are devoted to generators, diesel storage tanks, power substations, backup battery banks, water tanks, chilling plants and an office building. The annual maintenance costs are pegged at $20 million.
"No Intent Here To Become Big Brother"
"We built it big because we could," says Lonny Anderson, the NSA's chief information officer, who runs the agency's data acquisition, storage and processing effort. "It's a state-of-the-art facility," Anderson adds. "It's the nicest data center in the U.S. government maybe one of the nicest data centers there is."
It also gives the federal government's intelligence agencies easier access to the email, text message, cellphone and landline metadata the NSA collects, "for foreign intelligence purpose[s]," as Vine insists...
Read more: http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2013/09/23/225381596/booting-up-new-nsa-data-farm-takes-root-in-utah
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)How appropriate.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)...er, sorry...couldn't help myself...
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Exabyte-level storage is alarmingly high given the owners, but I don't buy for an instant that they're in the zettabyte or yottabyte range. That's just spinning huge numbers for emotional purposes and banking on the fact that people won't sanity-check them.
The thing's a big enough problem with the numbers that are feasible.
Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)or
bloomington-lib
(946 posts)It also gives the federal government's intelligence agencies easier access to YOUR email, text message, cellphone and landline metadata the NSA collects, "for foreign intelligence purpose," as Vine insists...
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)Not that we don't trust you, just that we are paying for it and it is OUR processing center.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)to become the back end of "the cloud". Then they wouldn't have to go get your data, you'd be indirectly paying them to store it... and with your data already stored on their equipment, they shouldn't have any issue accessing whatever they need.
Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)...We are seeing the NSA collecting data from all of the cloud providers we use: Google and Facebook and Apple and Yahoo, etc. We see the NSA in partnerships with all the major telcos in the U.S., and many others around the world, to collect data on the backbone. We see the NSA deliberately subverting cryptography, through secret agreements with vendors, to make security systems less effective. The scope and scale are enormous...
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/519336/bruce-schneier-nsa-spying-is-making-us-less-safe/
hughee99
(16,113 posts)they need and accessing the data directly without having to go through a 3rd party.
Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)I'd be surprised if the ptb haven't thought of it.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)loaded with an EMP weapon into the building?
PSPS
(13,591 posts)As long as it stands, we're not America.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)...with more than 1 million additional square feet devoted to generators, diesel storage tanks, power substations, backup battery banks, water tanks, chilling plants and an office building?
...and with annual maintenance costs pegged at $20 million?
???
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Its security was probably better than this facility's will be.
The datacenter in Reston I'm thinking of has 500K square feet of server space.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Equinix (formerly Switch & Data) has 500K square feet of server space compared to 100K in Utah.
Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)...for surveillance that's targeted largely at us.
We are paying the gravediggers for the tomb of our Constitution.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)As you know, or should know, the newer the data center, the denser it is in terms of power, drive space, virtualization, etc. And you can bet the place won't be filled with space-inefficient co-lo cages, just row after row after row of dense servers and storage. I'm pretty sure the NSA has the budget they need to get the latest and greatest. They also have more than 900,000 square feet to play with. When have you EVER toured a data center and not heard of plans to expand into the empty space? Final point: why on earth would we believe the NSA's claims of 100,000 square feet in a 1.5 million square foot facility? Generators, UPS, and offices and conference rooms for 100 employees don't make up the difference.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Which is also why that aerial shot of the Utah building was underwhelming to me.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)But you're looking at the floor space in use in Reston. I think you'd be impressed by some of the newer, denser data centers. I think we'd both be blown away if we could see the Utah facility. That's not to detract from Equinix, but the NSA is building a homogenous, single-customer data center. And as much as that disgusts me as a citizen, I'm professionally impressed with the scale of the undertaking.
Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)..."It's a state-of-the-art facility," Anderson adds. "It's the nicest data center in the U.S. government maybe one of the nicest data centers there is."
There you have it.
arikara
(5,562 posts)"We built it big because we could," says Lonny Anderson, the NSA's chief information officer, who runs the agency's data acquisition, storage and processing effort. "It's a state-of-the-art facility," Anderson adds. "It's the nicest data center in the U.S. government maybe one of the nicest data centers there is."
Lots of money for spying and war. No money to feed people though.
Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)...would first have to be on the side of the people.
Following the money, it's clear where the government's loyalties lie. (notice I didn't say "our" government..."
On Thursday, the House Republicans passed the Nutrition Reform and Work Opportunity Act (H.R. 3102) to cut approximately $39 billion from the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) over the next decade. If enacted, these cuts would eliminate food assistance to 3.8 million low-income Americans. http://www.foreffectivegov.org/node/12700
That's what jumped out at me too. "We built it big because we could"
Well thank goodness we had an excess of money from taking care of the poor and hungry that we could toss it into a big wasteful project.
Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)I'm sure the gov would be tickled to host our nation's less fortunate in "maybe one of the nicest data centers there is." Nah -- there would be that pesky "national security" thing in the way.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)They are not above criticism. We need to start spying on the spies. Shake some skeletons out of their closets. I wonder how Lonny Anderson, the NSA's chief technologist and information officer would feel if his personal information was data mined and shared? He acts like this is nothing. Too bad he can't get a taste of his own medicine.
NSA's chief technologist and information officer:
Mr. Anderson graduated from the University of Maryland (University College) in 1985 with a Bachelor of Arts in Government. He also graduated from the Defense Intelligence College in 1990 with a Master of Science in Strategic Intelligence.
Mr. Anderson joined NSA/CSS in May 2001 following a 21-year career in the United States Army.
Today, Rumsfeld appointee General Alexander sits in the command center as he has since he left his last position as deputy chief of staff for intelligence for the U.S. Army whose units included the ones involved with the torture of Iraqis at Abu Ghraib.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/15/nsa-mind-keith-alexander-star-trek
?uuid=ELDPwg-cEeGzpeoj2RvJbQ
This is the 'Let's not worry about the law. Let's just figure out how to get the job done,' Alexander before he went to HackerCon to recruit hackers. Master of disguise that one. Mr. Evil.
http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/1/3199153/nsa-recruitment-controversy-defcon-hacker-conference
They have no allegiance to anything, and provide no security. Why the hell are these swine from the Bush junta still in power?
defacto7
(13,485 posts)Sure as hell they can see inside it.
Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)The government elite will be the first to know if you go hungry (not that they will help you in any way).
blackspade
(10,056 posts)This is something that should be torn out by the roots.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)more billions of Federal taxpayer money to feed the monster.