Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,006 posts)
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 07:07 PM Sep 2013

City committee approves anti-abortion resolution

Source: Bakersfield Californian

Standing shoulder-to-shoulder with local right-to-life supporters, a Bakersfield City Council committee approved an anti-abortion resolution on Monday affirming that "there are many positive and feasible alternatives to abortion."

The resolution must still be approved by a council majority at a future meeting, and its passage is a step back from an earlier, more restrictive ordinance.

But its approval marked a victory for anti-abortion activists amid concern nationwide that abortion will increase under health care reform.

City Attorney Ginny Gennaro has said that even if the resolution is approved by the entire Bakersfield City Council, it would not be enforced.

Read more: http://www.bakersfieldcalifornian.com/local/x196571142/City-committee-approves-anti-abortion-resolution



The Central Valley = the armpit of an otherwise progressive state.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
City committee approves anti-abortion resolution (Original Post) alp227 Sep 2013 OP
Alternatives seveneyes Sep 2013 #1
I hope they're exposed to litigation regardless. Arrogance personified. n/t Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #2
Is Dying an option? HockeyMom Sep 2013 #3
Isn't it obvious? obxhead Sep 2013 #4
Stupid as Farmers Branch, Texas dem in texas Sep 2013 #5
"Bakersfield will probably be sued too." blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #7
Yuckersfield blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #6
Bakersfield, the right-wing billh58 Sep 2013 #8
Of course there are alternatives... Swede Atlanta Sep 2013 #9
There is a reason nobody wants to live in Bakersfield. nt SunSeeker Sep 2013 #10
WAKE THE FUCK UP! Indyfan53 Sep 2013 #11
 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
1. Alternatives
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 07:13 PM
Sep 2013

Here's one...keep your nose out of other peoples private medical concerns. There must be a smart way to get, and keep meddling creeps like these out of public positions.

</EditSpellingTypo>

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
3. Is Dying an option?
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 07:24 PM
Sep 2013

That was mine. I am sure these people would be fine with that. Unfortunately, me, my husband, our 3 year old daughter didn't like that option.

 

obxhead

(8,434 posts)
4. Isn't it obvious?
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 07:51 PM
Sep 2013

Increased access to health care will likely yield an increase of birth control use making abortions less... oh wait that's not it.

Give me a minute, I'm sure I can figure out their reasoning..... Never mind, reason is the thing completely missing.

dem in texas

(2,673 posts)
5. Stupid as Farmers Branch, Texas
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 08:06 PM
Sep 2013

Cities have enough to worry about without getting involved with what a woman is doing with her body. This is just like Farmers Branch trying to keep Mexicans from living there. So far it cost the city over 8 million in legal fees and they are appealing. Bakersfield will probably be sued too.

billh58

(6,635 posts)
8. Bakersfield, the right-wing
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 09:48 PM
Sep 2013

stronghold of Kern County:

"According to the California Secretary of State, as of April 2008, Kern County had 283,732 registered voters. Of those, 101,580 (35.8%) were Democrats, 131,878 (46.5%) were Republicans, 10,752 (3.8%) were registered with other political parties, and 39,522 (13.9%) declined to state a political party. The cities of Bakersfield, California City, Maricopa, Ridgecrest, Taft, Tehachapi, and the unincorporated areas had a plurality or majority of voters registered Republican. All of the other cities and towns had Democratic pluralities or majorities."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kern_County,_California

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
9. Of course there are alternatives...
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 10:07 PM
Sep 2013

I don't think anyone in the progressive community would disagree with that objective.

The alternatives include:
(1) Providing meaningful family planning education and means (i.e. condoms, etc.) to sexually active individuals
(2) Providing financial and medical support of a woman who, in concert with the father, have elected to bring the child to term and then offer them for adoption
(3) Providing financial and medical support for a woman who, in concert with the father, choose to bring the child to term and raise it as their own. This includes living wages for the parent(s), safe neighborhoods free of NRA weapons and bullets, access to affordable health care, subsistence so they have nutritious and adequate food, a competent education that positions them for the future

But of course Republicans are only concerned about forcing her to have he baby. They don't care about the woman, the father or the baby. They hate the baby. They don't want to ensure the "life" they fought to save is a good life, one with opportunity, etc.

They are hopeless losers but we will never win this argument.

Indyfan53

(473 posts)
11. WAKE THE FUCK UP!
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 11:17 PM
Sep 2013

These pro-life fucks need to be tear gassed by the police!

This is unconstitutional! Why isn't more action being taken against these fascist? Where is NARAL on this?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»City committee approves a...