One Big Trader Lost Millions Betting on Romney, Study Finds
Source: Wall Street Journal
Two economists who studied the data offer various rationales for the traders aggressive wagering on Mr. Romney in the final two weeks of the campaign. The anonymous trader placed 1.2 million pro-Romney contracts, some of which were actually in the form of bets against a Barack Obama victory.
The most plausible reason for the betting, the authors conclude, is that this trader could have been attempting to manipulate beliefs about the odds of victory in an attempt to boost fundraising, campaign morale, and turnout.
The economists, Rajiv Sethi, of Barnard College and Columbia University, and David Rothschild, of Microsoft Research, also analyze the possibility that the trader, who accounted for a third of all the money wagered on Mr. Romney in the last two weeks, could have placed his bets either to hedge on wagers in other markets or simply because he thought the price was good.
Read more: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/09/23/one-big-trader-lost-millions-betting-on-romney-study-finds/
Sounds like he was a bad a businessman as Romney was...
srican69
(1,426 posts)was a good businessman from an ROI standpoint .. anyone who beats the S&P on a risk adjusted basis ( fairly or unfairly is besides the point) will be considered a good business manager .. i know all of us hate the romneybot - but let it not cloud our judgment.
brooklynite
(94,507 posts)Consider his personnel choices...
...his capital investments (holding back on advertising until late in the game when the prices went up)
...his research and development (buying into "unskewed polls"0
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Mitt Romney is a RACKETEER
And I can prove it.
Just look at my threads.
Justice is coming!
Left Coast2020
(2,397 posts)Business involves building relationships--not trying to see who you can screw next.
Hense, the "47-percent" who are not interested in his character or business ethics.
bhikkhu
(10,715 posts)from Wikipedia: "One study of 68 deals that Bain Capital made up through the 1990s found that the firm lost money or broke even on 33 of them. Another study that looked at the eight-year period following 77 deals during the same time found that in 17 cases the company went bankrupt or out of business, and in 6 cases Bain Capital lost all its investment. But 10 deals were very successful and represented 70 percent of the total profits."
They did wind up making a lot of money (mostly with other people's money), but he left more wreckage in his wake than anything else, even if he was clever enough to insulate himself and his investors from much of it. Rolling the dice if fine until you lose, or if you've rigged the game to your advantage. I don't see anything there that defines "good businessman" to me.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)trumpet fanfare, please -- Romney himself.
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)Some people look at how they can create something, some people look at how they can help others, some people look at how the can leave this planet better than how they found it, Romney looks for a loophole to exploit.
Romney is a classic parasite, he creates nothing. Romeny makes his money off of other's hard work and accomplishments. At the end of the day he takes more than he gives and the sad part about he doesn't even realize he's one of the 'takers' he was complaining about.
Botany
(70,501 posts).... to "buy" businesses and then fire the workers, sell off the assists, load that business
up with debt, and if that business still made a product for which their was a market he
would outsource the production to China or some other country.
He made his money fucking people and the country.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)by being one of the annointed (son of famous businessman/politician).
For being such a star studded businessman, he ran an atrocious campaign. Like I said before, he must be warmed to know that his Orca project will be used as a case study of how not to implement IT in business schools for years to come.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)making your fortune by putting millions of Americans out of work and shipping their jobs overseas to slave labor, and then breaking up companies and selling them off to earn profit, then yes he was a "good businessman."
If you mean "good businessman" in that he was an innovative inventor who created things people want to buy and marketed them well, then no, he absolutely sucked at that. He never created anything and only made his money by destroying and rigging the game.
I'm tired of seeing assholes who do nothing but destroy labeled as "good businessmen." It doesn't take a whole lot of genius to do what Romney did. It just takes having no soul and to be born in a position of privilege to be at the top to make those kind of decisions that affect million below them.
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)Businessmen produce something or trade money for something that benefits someone.
BlueMTexpat
(15,367 posts)for himself and his investors. Which is exactly what it seems to have been.
But he destroyed some businesses in the process and as a result put many on the unemployment rolls. So, if being a greedy, selfish, shrewd but heartless person is what "success" in business means, then yes, he can be considered a success.
This is a Wiki url (with all caveats necessary), but it's a good point of departure, at least for an overview. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bain_Capital
Warren Buffett presents a much different model. IMO, Buffet and those like him are true business successes because they consider the long-term holistic business environment rather than their own short-sighted short-term selfish advantages.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)nothing but low-down horse traders, sold a medicated to hide lameness horse, for 125k. They pay the Vet bills, they know exactly what a horse is medicated with. even their horse insurance made note of the lameness.
Super Hit had Butorphanol, Delomidine, Romifidine, and Xylatine in its system at the time of his sale, according to court documents. Testified an expert: In my 38 years of practice, I have never come across a drug screen such as this where the horse has been administered so many different medications at the same time.
https://www.google.com/#q=romney+%22Super+Hit%22
DJ13
(23,671 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Thanks Romney!
AnnieBW
(10,424 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)When newlyweds Ann and Mitt Romney were living together while attending Brigham Young, things were pretty swell. "We were happy, studying hard, Romney said in an infamous Boston Globe interview back in 1994, when Mittens was running for the senate. Neither one of us had a job, because Mitt had enough of an investment from stock that we could sell off a little at a time, she explained.
How awesome is that?!? The stock came courtesy of Mitt's papa, who had invested Mitts birthday money every year. Ann looks back fondly on this time as a period when she and Mitt were really roughing it. For realz.
Link:
http://www.alternet.org/election-2012/5-most-ridiculously-offensive-quotes-ann-romney
The quotes there are great. Give them a read.
xfundy
(5,105 posts)because there is a natural human urge to follow the herd. Marketing data show it, polling data show it, if someone has no opinion, they will naturally lean toward whichever way the other sheep or lemmings tend to go in.
Those who proclaim science sinful sure do rely on it, especially in terms of group behaviour.
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)Maybe it WAS Romney...
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Donny doesn't like backing losers so he tried to game the system.
Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)Although that wouldn't fit the "build confidence" motive. Romney honestly thought he was going to win and didn't even write a concession speech until after Karl Rove gave up.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Maybe it was someone that was going by Romney's internal polling. Wouldn't be funny.
No Vested Interest
(5,166 posts)And this was a very rich sucker.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)coldmountain
(802 posts)it was proabably just another venue for advertising for Romney
irisblue
(32,969 posts)struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)Tab
(11,093 posts)n/t
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)"The billionaire donors I hear are livid," one Republican operative told The Huffington Post. "There is some holy hell to pay. Karl Rove has a lot of explaining to do ... I don't know how you tell your donors that we spent $390 million and got nothing."
http://www.prwatch.org/news/2012/11/11854/biggest-loser-2012-election-karl-rove
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)he was wasting an awful lot of money on candidates during the primaries.
They_Live
(3,231 posts)and I also keep thinking about the events going on around the world at the time of the campaign and how Mitt tried to capitalize on something that didn't work out the way he thought that it might. Then I wonder if that event had been intentionally planned for Mitt to use in his campaign.
Cha
(297,156 posts)Maybe he was mainlining rove on fox. Can you imagine his shock the night of the election11!!!!
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)and goes postal. A lot of the nation's problems would be helped.
gopiscrap
(23,757 posts)diane in sf
(3,913 posts)And he was thwarted by Anonymous along with KKKarl. I'll never forget the election meltdown KKKarl had on Fox.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)Mortimer Duke of Trading Places,
"
President of Exchange: [Randolph Duke has just collapsed with shock] Mortimer, your brother is not well. We better call an ambulance.
Mortimer Duke: F*** him! Now, you listen to me! I want trading reopened right now. Get those brokers back in here! Turn those machines back on!
[shouts - it echoes pathetically throughout the trading hall]
Mortimer Duke: Turn those machines back on!
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Unfortunately, being a victim of Romney's organized crime spree is of little consequence. Everyone inherently turns a deaf ear when a victim speaks out. Mitt's team offered yours truly a bribe of $850,000 and a chance to become his partner and - Not only did I tell them to take their offer and shove it - I reported them to the Department of Justice.
The reason the DOJ didn't arrest Mitt Romney is his "retroactive" secret.
And no one will tell the tale.
No one will believe me.
It sucks SOOOOO MUCHHHH!
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,309 posts)Historical data tends to show the US economy does worse under Republican presidents. So you need a way to make money out of a Republican president to make up for this - the most direct thing to do is bet on them to win.
PuffedMica
(1,061 posts)They were just throwing a little 'walking around money' after their guy. What else could they do, they had already reached the campaign limit for direct donations.
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)At least he didn't take his Obama Derangement Syndrome to this level
http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/11/14/key-west-suicide-blamed-on-obamas-re-electon/
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)All Intrade contracts had a buyer and a seller. If this big trader (i.e., bettor) dropped a few million, then that means a few million in profit for people betting on Obama (or against Romney).
The unnamed trader was implementing Obama's statement to Joe the Plumber about sharing the wealth. Money was flowing to people who supported Obama or who, if not supporting him, could at least read the writing on the wall.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)sore losers
lastlib
(23,220 posts)Elections have consequences. I'm always excited when stupid Repuglicans losing/wasting money is one of them.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)I hope it hurt!!!! Badly!
hughee99
(16,113 posts)of a presidential election deserve to lose $7 million dollars. I wonder how someone with so little common sense would come by $7 million in the first place.
I seriously doubt his intention was to try to sway any sort of public opinion on Rmoney's chances, perhaps he just liked the price and had that kind of money to piss away.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)who was that 'big gambler' on stage that made the 10k off the cuff bet on national Tv?
hughee99
(16,113 posts)and if they present intrade "betting slips", that probably won't fly well either. Hell, it could be someone who stood to gain a great deal if Obama was elected and was putting some money on Rmoney (and getting odds) to hedge his bet. Without knowing the source, there's no way to tell.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)As I recall American banks didn't allow transaction bets about a week or more before the election? maybe it was foreign money transaction.
they still have legal troubles and explain on their website. here's their website link. http://www.intrade.com/v4/home/
KansDem
(28,498 posts)BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)are soon parted. He must have truly believed that Rmoney could buy the election.
ThomThom
(1,486 posts)he thought the fix was in so he bet big
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)obamacarerules
(2 posts)Lol
Gman
(24,780 posts)In a campaign where, from all sources we'll over a billion dollars was spent. I think they were manipulating InTrade.
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)Right now Silver has the best model out there for forecasting the election. Successful voter suppression efforts will like skew results in the future as a lot of likely voters will end up not being allowed to vote.
MythosMaster
(445 posts)imagine that?
The free market is not free.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Just wondering.
Agony
(2,605 posts)llmart
(15,536 posts)There's a sucker born every minute.
(I have no idea if that was W.C. fields or not, but it seemed appropriate for this story
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Sad.