GOP to add 'conscience clause' to spending bill
Source: CNN
Washington (CNN) - House Republicans have added a measure aimed at limiting contraceptive coverage to the spending bill coming up for a vote Saturday night, a spokesman for Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kansas, told CNN.
A senior House leadership aide confirmed that development.
The so-called conscience clause would allow employers and insurers to opt out of preventative care for women which they find objectionable on moral or religious grounds. That prominently includes birth control, which most insurers are required to provide for free under current Obamacare rules.
With this move, House Republican leaders would give any employer or group health plan the ability to opt out of contraception coverage for the next year. That time frame syncs up with the larger measure in which this is included: a one-year delay of Obamacare provisions not yet in effect.
Read more: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/09/28/gop-to-add-conscience-clause-to-spending-bill/
neverforget
(9,436 posts)maryellen99
(3,785 posts)They believe that anyone who needs or uses birth control is a slut.
sakabatou
(42,136 posts)BFreeFranklin
(5 posts)like Cheney in the Vietnam war, what woman would voluntarily opt out of the necessarily drugs and medical services attached to reproductive issues? You've got a pain in your ovaries? Sorry can't treat you. You opted out as a conscie. Tough luck girl.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)The article below is a REAL article...
Here: Here: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/09/26/2683131/republicans-say-they-will-raise-the-debt-ceiling-for-one-year-if-obama-becomes-a-republican/
yuiyoshida
(41,818 posts)Republicans are criminals.
RiverNoord
(1,150 posts)These seemingly insane demands on issues that simply get people really incensed tend to be about as much information as most voters care to digest. Finding wedge issues to keep the electorate distracted from what is actually happening to their government is the #1 task of the GOP.
Old Navy
(84 posts)They're just obstructing and WILL shut down the government, and WILL suffer the consquences of the shutdown, ensuring angry Americans ready to kick them out in '14, gerrymandering or not.
RiverNoord
(1,150 posts)into this position? This is more about the incapacity of the American electorate to make reasonable decisions concerning their government than it is about the snake oil selling, gun worshiping, big-business adoring, gay-hating, racist, sexist, utterly offensive idiots that somehow get voted into office.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Sadly enough.
calimary
(81,109 posts)Frankly, I wish there would be a "No Nookie" backlash. Wonder how long these GOP schmucks (most of them men) would hold out if their wives and girlfriends said NO, and any attempts at hookers or other "outlets" also denied them sex? Actually, some of 'em are so far gone I wouldn't expect even that to carry any weight.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Been reading ancient Greek comedy, have we?
QuestForSense
(653 posts)That and perhaps Viagra!
calimary
(81,109 posts)Glad you're here! Good points you add in there!
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)It's just one more way they can be huge pains in the ass to the rest of us.
inch4progress
(270 posts)What about protecting the persons right to their bodily functions. Jeesh.
Way to go republicans. Next you will be telling women when it is and isn't alright to have a period.......or maybe bring back some more laws like this one.................
calimary
(81,109 posts)Glad you're here! Stunning, isn't it? I like MY solution the best. Round 'em all up and ship 'em to Somalia. All the anarchy and lawlessness and no-government and no-laws and no-regulations they can eat. Pirates and rapists running amok, a handful of super-rich warlords unrestrained, millions of homeless, sick, and starving you don't have to give a rat's ass about, and all the free-and-easy guns and ammo you can hoard! Sounds like their idea of Heaven-on-Earth, to me. They can even rename it Reagania if they like! Or maybe Cruzistan or something?
inch4progress
(270 posts)Thanks, I'm glad to be here It was certainly hard to find a haven for rational liberalism. DU seems to be that haven.
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)In their Absence of Intelligence Design curriculum
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)How does it offend their 'morals' that a woman can get contraceptives under the plan? They have a very sick view of human behavior.
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)... but they do it in such a caring way
winstars
(4,219 posts)TxDemChem
(1,918 posts)I read that they were doing some soul-searching after their 2012 loss; no word yet on them finding one.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)maryellen99
(3,785 posts)Why are so insistent on wanting the status quo when it comes to health care?
Let's see, birth control or medical care, hospital, drugs, delivery etc., and everything in between.
The insurance companies can do the math, maybe they might decrease their campaign contributions to these knuckleheads. That'll get their attention.
StoneCarver
(249 posts)Why doesn't anyone mention Jehovah Wittinesss? If they were your employer they could "object" to paying for blood transfusions on "conscience clause" grounds. Their religion prohibits such medical practices. When does the BS stop? And why doesn't mainstream media mention such an example?
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)haven't since the early 90s. And the use of birth control has NEVER been an issue for them either. I get angry when people repeat old or inaccurate info.
The women can wear make-up and clothing with zippers as well. And they are all allowed to wear jewelry, too. When you spout information regarding any religion, you should make sure you are stating facts!
StoneCarver
(249 posts)Jehovah's Witnesses believe that the Bible prohibits ingesting blood and that Christians should therefore not accept blood transfusions or donate or store their own blood for transfusion.[1] The belief is based on an interpretation of scripture that differs from that of mainstream Christian denominations.[2] It is one of the doctrines for which Jehovah's Witnesses are most well known.[3]
Watch Tower Society publications teach that the Witnesses' refusal of transfusions of whole blood or its four primary componentsred cells, white cells, platelets and plasmais a non-negotiable religious stand and that those who respect life as a gift from God do not try to sustain life by taking in blood,[4][5] even in an emergency
The doctrine was introduced in 1945, and has undergone some changes since then. Members of the religion who voluntarily accept a transfusion are regarded as having disassociated themselves from the religion by abandoning its doctrines[7][8][9] and are subsequently shunned by members of the organization.[10] Although accepted by the majority of Jehovah's Witnesses, a minority does not endorse this doctrine.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)It all had to do with gaining access to religious status in some countries overseas. They no long disfellowship you, they disassociate you by your actions, as you stated. There a a lot of things they get you for with this tactic. They also use it if you celebrate any holidays, or a birthday.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)a mind of your own. Organized religions need sheep, not free-thinkers! Having free-thinkers frequently attending services gives the sheep ideas. Some members of the flock may decide that God doesn't need money or that their bodies are God's temple afterall and they shouldn't have to maintain or pay for a physical place of worship like a temple or synagogue or whatever.
I don't follow what you mean about gaining access to status in countries overseas, but I resent when any single religion is pointed out as being a cult - as far as I am concerned, all religions are cults.
StoneCarver
(249 posts)Back to the point A Jehovahs witnesses EMPLOYER could invoke the conscience clause and not pay for a much needed blood transfusion, bone marrow transplant, etc. Any religious conscience clause to deny healthcare to an Employee from an EMPLOYER cant exist. I dont care if the EMPLOYER is Catholic, Jehovah's Witness, or Mormon. This isn't a forum to pick on any one belief but bring reason to the table.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Only a few do that and the JW's are one, and I may add they do a very good job of shunning.
In order to gain religious status, and the perks that go with it, they had to change their no blood policy, so they "said" they did not disfellowship those who took transfusions, yet if one takes a transfusion they disassociate themselves which gets them shunned.
I would be glad to discuss this on another board, religious board or whatever, but you seem to have the wrong facts about the religion. As for a cult, I never used that word, and I never have. I still have friends and family who are JW's, some very good people are JW's. I just think their leadership, like many other religions, are trying to control them way to much and using the fear of shunning to keep them in line.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)So they rejected their own doctrines. On what grounds? Now Jehovah doesn't mind whereas he did before?
Y'know... if they eject all the supernatural stuff, like Jehovah, they'd be completely up to date.
Religion is ridiculous.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)They call it "new light" that is given to the "governing body" by God. It's easier that way to change predictions that never came true, or to change teachings they know don't work anymore. All they have to do is claim that Jehovah gave them "new light", and no matter what their followers believe them. Kind of like when fox news say one thing, changes it and denies they ever said it, and their followers believe them.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)or they do what they want.
Religion is so obviously about man alone and nothing much to do with the universe and our place in it.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Religions can pretty much say, or do whatever they want and the followers will get in line behind them. They use the same tactics that the GOP use, fear and hate, and it works for both of them. First you get them scared of what will happen if they don't follow the orders from the leaders, then they use hate to get them into the "us or them" mode. If you aren't one of us, we hate you and your actions, and of course the old "you can't be a real________ if you don't believe as we do!
Andy823
(11,495 posts)I know for a fact that's not true. I was a JW back in the early 90's and my daughter had to have surgery, not likely she would have need a transfusion, but the elders made sure that I was NOT to allow a transfusion. They did have to "say" they did not prohibit transfusions in the late 90's because some countries they were trying to get into would not allow them if they prohibited blood transfusions. We, JW's, were told by our elders that we would not be disfellowshipped but would be "disassociated" by our actions if we did allow a transfusion for ourselves or our children. A simple technicality used by the society to gain entrance into some countries, but still be able to out anyone who disobeyed the no transfusion teaching.
Two of my brother in laws are elders and I know for a fact in the early 2000's they were still telling members NO TRANSFUSIONS! Maybe you should get your facts straight before making such claims.
liberal N proud
(60,332 posts)hue
(4,949 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)think the House made that perfectly clear. They are.
Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)I sure hope their lobotomy is reversible, because it was never in question, no matter how hard the media tried to turn this into a made for TV drama.
Beartracks
(12,797 posts)'Cuz it's true.
=====================================
mountain grammy
(26,598 posts)sheshe2
(83,654 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)by working out a deal that screws everyone except the billionaires.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)-snip-
UPDATE: 5:14 p.m. ET -- The White House weighed in later, similarly condemning the GOP effort:
Today Republicans in the House of Representatives moved to shut down the government. Congress has two jobs to do: pass budgets and pay the bills it has racked up. Republicans in Congress had the opportunity to pass a routine, simple continuing resolution that keeps the government running for a few more weeks. But instead, Republicans decided they would rather make an ideological point by demanding the sabotage of the health care law. Republicans have tried and failed to defund or delay the health care law more than 40 times, and they know this demand is reckless and irresponsible. The President has shown that he is willing to improve the health care law and meet Republicans more than halfway to deal with our fiscal challenges, but he will not do so under threats of a government shutdown that will hurt our economy. Any member of the Republican Party who votes for this bill is voting for a shutdown. It's time for the House to listen to the American people and act, as the Senate has, in a reasonable way to pass a bill that keeps the government running and move on.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/28/government-shutdown-house_n_4008982.html
Below is a previous update / Statement from Senate Majority Leader Reid
Todays vote by House Republicans is pointless. As I have said repeatedly, the Senate will reject any Republican attempt to force changes to the Affordable Care Act through a mandatory government funding bill or the debt ceiling. Furthermore, President Obama has stated that he would veto such measures if they ever reached his desk.
To be absolutely clear, the Senate will reject both the one-year delay of the Affordable Care Act and the repeal of the medical device tax. After weeks of futile political games from Republicans, we are still at square one: Republicans must decide whether to pass the Senates clean CR, or force a Republican government shutdown.
Senate Democrats have shown that we are willing to debate and vote on a wide range of issues, including efforts to improve the Affordable Care Act. We continue to be willing to debate these issues in a calm and rational atmosphere. But the American people will not be extorted by Tea Party anarchists.
-snip-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/28/government-shutdown-house_n_4008982.html
p.s. Bolding above for emphasis is mine.
Hekate
(90,552 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Opps, wait, that didn't happen.
Javaman
(62,500 posts)Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)but now the media draws a line right in the middle of the Democrats and Republicans and declares that the truth, so the crazier the republicans get, the more their insanity gets considered to be true.
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)That should be the slogan.
20score
(4,769 posts)elleng
(130,732 posts)Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)gray bearded Republicans sitting around scratching their asses wondering who the Fucks idea was it to welcome these Tea Party assholes into the GOP.
Their point of no return has passed!
gopiscrap
(23,726 posts)skying05
(5 posts)how strange
sakabatou
(42,136 posts)Welcome to DU.