Arizona police sergeant demoted over Obama photo on Facebook
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-02-28/ariz-officer-obama-facebook/53294478/1USA Today
An Arizona police sergeant has been demoted and suspended for two weeks without pay for posting a photo of a bullet-riddled image of President Obama on Facebook.
Officials in the Phoenix suburb said Tuesday that Pat Shearer will be demoted to the rank of officer, which means a reduction in pay.
Shearer has 10 days to appeal. The 25-year veteran had been reassigned to administrative duties during the investigation.
The photo on Shearer's Facebook profile showed seven teenagers. Some were holding guns and one was holding what appeared to be a shot-up Obama T-shirt. The image was removed soon after it was posted.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)as many in the ranks of local law "enforcement" are right wingers (an hostile to the elected President).
Police must be held to higher standards. They cannot have the power without the responsibility.
Herr Shearer needs to be fired.
patrice
(47,992 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Like this terrible female officer, who got immediately fired: http://www.policeone.com/legal/articles/2304790-Posing-performing-and-conduct-unbecoming/
You know, because that's so much more harmful than glorifying assassination of our President.
Lasher
(27,575 posts)Never seen any of them myself though.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Unbelievable.
Lex
(34,108 posts)of the picture, he'd have enough brain cells to realize that it would be a big no-no, given what he does for a living.
Fox News keeps these folks thinking that everyone agrees with them, I guess.
anti-alec
(420 posts)together......
Yeah, time to fire his sorry ass. Demotion won't do any good.
Response to Ruby the Liberal (Reply #3)
Post removed
24601
(3,959 posts)a long talk with the Secret Service", then no problem.
But if it implied agreement, or the appearance of agreement, then any officer posting that about any president, or non-president for that matter, should be up on charges of bringing discredit on his/her department.
And when it involves any Secret Service protectee, that's just stuck on stupid!
madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)with the Secret Service.
47of74
(18,470 posts)PavePusher
(15,374 posts)sounds a lot like North Korea/Orwell's 1984.
No, thank you. Distasteful as this may be, decending to totalitarianism is not the answer.
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)Seems like a beautiful state with many good people but have all the right wing crazies taken over or what?
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Papers, please:
midnight
(26,624 posts)Obamacare
(277 posts)A 25yr vet, what a fucking loser, he must lead a miserable life to do such a thing.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)they would be called al Qaeda & be hanging by their scrotum in a kennel in Gitmo within an hour of posting that pic.
Incitatus
(5,317 posts)I guess there's a lack of intelligence/judgment screening.
Sirveri
(4,517 posts)Seriously, some guy got turned down for a LEO job because of that and took his department to court over it.
They said it was because the super intelligent would 'get bored'.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Sometimes, the "super intelligent" are not always the "super motivated." They have a right to a comfort zone as much as anyone else. I wish we'd start hiring smarter police officers--there are too many dumbasses in blue out there. The good ones have to take the heat for those idiots.
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)If a LEO starts thinking too much, they might not feel so good about some of the laws they are asked to enforce. They might not want to cover up the actions of someone like Tony Bologna. They might even stand with a protest, or refuse to jail people purely based on skin color or unfounded assertions. They might even feel bad about some things. And thats bad for business.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I like brains behind decisions--it generally makes them better ones.
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)However, people who think that way do not appear to be running the system, nor holding the power in any major city, state, or federal government position.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)that would be a pretty good indication of how they want to deal with people they disagree with and/or aren't like them.
24601
(3,959 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)it is morally wrong, but Bush was clearly the puppet of larger interests, and it's doubtful Cheney would have done the job any differently (except maybe worse).
Progressives actually think beyond the knee jerk reactions of the right. I wonder if the nitwits who made that target stopped to think, ''Hey, if we did kill him, would we be happier with Biden as president?'' or ''This won't change the ideological trends in America?''
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)There's plenty of stuff to legitimately criticize without resorting to invention and hyperbole.
davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)He's lucky he doesn't work in my area, I'm almost 100% positive he would've been fired for sheer stupidity. Seriously, what kind of moron posts that crap on facebook?
The Wizard
(12,542 posts)hiding behind a badge requires neither brains nor guts.
MADem
(135,425 posts)It's not a First Amendment issue--it's an issue of simple, basic judgment. He is --and should be WAS--a law enforcement officer, and thus should be held to a higher standard.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
stonecutter357
(12,695 posts)"to protect and to serve"