Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 01:56 PM Nov 2013

Sebelius Rejects Bipartisan Calls for Delay in Health Law

Source: New York Times

WASHINGTON — Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, categorically rejected bipartisan calls to delay parts of the new health care law during testimony Wednesday before a Senate committee.

“Delaying the Affordable Care Act would not delay people’s cancer or diabetes or Parkinson’s disease,” Ms. Sebelius said. “It would not delay the need for mental health services or cholesterol screenings or prenatal care. Delaying the Affordable Care Act doesn’t delay the foreclosure notices for families forced into bankruptcy by unpayable medical bills.”

With many people unable to obtain coverage through the federal insurance marketplace, lawmakers of both parties have suggested extending the open enrollment period or delaying the financial penalties for those who go without insurance.

“For millions of Americans, delay is not an option,” Ms. Sebelius said at a hearing of the Senate Finance Committee. “People’s lives depend on this.”






Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/07/us/politics/overseer-of-health-website-retiring.html?_r=0

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sebelius Rejects Bipartisan Calls for Delay in Health Law (Original Post) Purveyor Nov 2013 OP
Good for her nt geek tragedy Nov 2013 #1
They should at least do something Dopers_Greed Nov 2013 #2
The site is being fixed and the Democrats are NOT digging their graves. Did you see the monmouth3 Nov 2013 #3
It's really going to hurt the working poor in the red states - badly. lark Nov 2013 #4
The mandate doesn't apply in states that didn't expand Medicaid if the person geek tragedy Nov 2013 #14
Are you sure about that? lark Nov 2013 #16
per healthcare.gov geek tragedy Nov 2013 #17
Thanks greek lark Nov 2013 #18
Hope especially if Rick Scott loses and he becomes eligible for Medicaid. nt geek tragedy Nov 2013 #19
I'm still in disbelief that he won the first time. lark Nov 2013 #20
Did you see the election results? former9thward Nov 2013 #6
Sorry I don't meet with your intellectual high bar, but the projected believable polls did not have monmouth3 Nov 2013 #7
So all these analysts saying the election was unexpectedly close.. former9thward Nov 2013 #8
Guess not and neither did you apparently...n/t monmouth3 Nov 2013 #10
You mean like the one ran by McAuliffe's campaign, that showed a 2-4 point margin? geek tragedy Nov 2013 #11
Thank you for vomiting up the rightwing's spin on Virginia. geek tragedy Nov 2013 #9
Thank you for your concern. Enjoy your brief stay here nt geek tragedy Nov 2013 #12
"People's lives depend on this"?? red dog 1 Nov 2013 #5
It would mean higher premiums for those who do sign up because the healthy would join later, thus geek tragedy Nov 2013 #13
NPR report on the hearing alp227 Nov 2013 #15

Dopers_Greed

(2,640 posts)
2. They should at least do something
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 02:04 PM
Nov 2013

Maybe extend the enrollment period for however long the site went without being fully functional.

The Dems are digging their graves with this.

monmouth3

(3,871 posts)
3. The site is being fixed and the Democrats are NOT digging their graves. Did you see the
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 02:19 PM
Nov 2013

election results from yesterday? Oh, and welcome to DU...

lark

(23,091 posts)
4. It's really going to hurt the working poor in the red states - badly.
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 02:27 PM
Nov 2013

Think they should let people off the hook who have incomes up to 130% of FPL and live in states whose assholes legislatures voted to not expand Medicaid. The subsidies being offerred aren't enough when you have no room for any extras at all. My son barely pays rent and buys gas, eats at the restaurant where he works, has no disposable income and can't afford the cheapest bronze policy in FL. He also can't pay the fine, so I will have to continue paying his medical costs and the penalty. Know Obama didn't plan for this, but when the Supreme Court threw out mandatory Medicaid expansion, something should have been done! Now, the Democratic party is hurting those that should be their natural voters, especially younger people, and turning them off to all politics. My son won't vote Repug, but he won't be out working for Dems anymore either and probably won't vote in the next elections, he's so angry.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
14. The mandate doesn't apply in states that didn't expand Medicaid if the person
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 05:41 PM
Nov 2013

would qualify for the Medicaid expansion.

lark

(23,091 posts)
16. Are you sure about that?
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:09 PM
Nov 2013

I have read differently in a number of articles and couldn't get to a person at Healthcare.gov to find out. Just got a hang-up after holding for a long time.

I really hope and pray you are right! My son, along with a whole lot of working poor in FL, really needs help, not another kick in the ass.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
17. per healthcare.gov
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:13 PM
Nov 2013
https://www.healthcare.gov/exemptions/

Hardship exemptions
If you have any of the circumstances below that affect your ability to purchase health insurance coverage, you may qualify for a “hardship” exemption:

12.You were determined ineligible for Medicaid because your state didn’t expand eligibility for Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act.


Link also has information on applying for exemption.

lark

(23,091 posts)
20. I'm still in disbelief that he won the first time.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:30 PM
Nov 2013

Like really don't think he did, just bought the machine results he wanted. I don't know anyone who voted for him besides my 86 (at the time) year old mother and this includes a friend who voted Dem for the first time ever because even she knew Scott was evil.

Ironically enough, Scott wanted to expand Medicaid because of his hospital connections, it was the stupid knuckledragger legislators who vetoed the idea. Assholes all! It would take a monumental shift to get the state legislature here even to purple - it's pretty solid red now and has been for some time. I really don't have any hope of Medicaid expansion happening here, it just isn't going to happen. Too many teahadists.

former9thward

(31,974 posts)
6. Did you see the election results?
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 05:08 PM
Nov 2013

Terry McAuliffe was supposed to win by 10-12% and he wins by 2% after Cuccinelli said at the last minute to vote for him because of Obamacare. The only reason McAuliffe won is because a libertarian was in there. Elected Democrats are smarter than some posting here.

monmouth3

(3,871 posts)
7. Sorry I don't meet with your intellectual high bar, but the projected believable polls did not have
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 05:16 PM
Nov 2013

McAuliffe that high. 10-12% was a joke but if you want to believe it then be my guest.

former9thward

(31,974 posts)
8. So all these analysts saying the election was unexpectedly close..
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 05:19 PM
Nov 2013

Don't know what they are talking about. I guess they didn't see the "believable polls."

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
11. You mean like the one ran by McAuliffe's campaign, that showed a 2-4 point margin?
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 05:23 PM
Nov 2013

If you know anything about Virginia, you know that the electorate that turns out in gubernatorial elections is much older, much whiter, much richer, and more male than the general election electorate.

No way was McAuliffe--who's about as uninspiring as they come--going to get an electorate as favorable as Obama did when he won by 4%.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
9. Thank you for vomiting up the rightwing's spin on Virginia.
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 05:20 PM
Nov 2013

Here's reality.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mcauliffe-pollster-cuccinelli-s-obamacare-stance-a-liability

Geoff Garin, pollster for Governor-elect Terry McAuliffe, said Wednesday that GOP gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli's position on Obamacare may have cost him the election.

"We tested Cuccinelli’s brag that he was the first attorney general to sue to stop Obamacare," Garin said. "That actually made more voters less likely to support him than more."

Garin said that even for voters who disapprove of the health care law, Cuccinelli's stance was too extreme.

"A majority disapproved of the Affordable Care Act, but in Virginia, as elsewhere, we found that a lot of these voters want to fix the law," Garin told the Washington Post. "'Cuccinellis' position on Obamacare actually supported what we were saying about him, which is that he was extreme and supported a national Tea Party agenda."

Garin also said McAuliffe's somewhat narrow win over Cuccinelli was expected by his campaign team.

"With the exception of a brief spike during the government shutdown, Terry's lead was never less than two points, and never greater than four," Garin said. "It was a stable race."

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
5. "People's lives depend on this"??
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 03:50 PM
Nov 2013

"For millions of Americans, delay is not an option"???
"Delaying the ACA would not delay people's cancer or diabetes or Parkinson's disease"??

Those with cancer, diabetes or Parkinson's Disease could still sign up for affordable health care without any delay, couldn't they?

The bipartisan calls to delay the open enrollment period and to delay the financial penalties for those who go without insurance doesn't mean that other parts of ACA can't still go into effect right away, so those who need a health care plan should still be able to get one, while those who need more time to choose should not have to be penalized.




 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
13. It would mean higher premiums for those who do sign up because the healthy would join later, thus
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 05:25 PM
Nov 2013

making the insurance pool older, sicker, and more expensive.

alp227

(32,016 posts)
15. NPR report on the hearing
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 01:05 AM
Nov 2013
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=243537883

Excerpts

CHANG: Sebelius pointed out a number of improvements to the site. Pages are loading within one second instead of several. Filtering through health plans, which used to take minutes, now takes seconds. And fewer error messages are popping up. Great, said Republican John Cornyn of Texas, but that still doesn't solve another problem.

He pointed to the White House website, which he said was still insisting that you could keep your health plan if you like it, despite news reports that people across the country were getting cancellation notices.

SENATOR JOHN CORNYN: Well, we know that lying to Congress is a crime, but unfortunately lying to the American people is not. I'd just like to ask you a simple true or false question. Is that statement on the White House website true or is it false?

SEBELIUS: Sir, I think the statement is that you can keep your plan...

CORNYN: Is it true or is it false, Madam Secretary?

CHANG: Sebelius wouldn't give him a one-word answer, so Cornyn switched gears, jumping to the Obamacare navigators. These are people hired to educate the public about how to enroll. Cornyn was concerned these navigators didn't undergo federal background checks.

CORNYN: So a convicted felon could be a navigator and could acquire sensitive personal information from an individual unbeknownst to them.

SEBELIUS: That is possible.

CHANG: Other committee members spent their entire question time not waiting for answers, like Republican Pat Roberts of Kansas.

SENATOR PAT ROBERTS: So I have to wonder if you have any regrets, any regrets at all, that you failed to heed the warnings, that you ignored the calls from members of Congress, you proceeded to open the exchanges on October 1.

CHANG: He never let Sebelius respond and ended his few minutes calling for her resignation again. Ailsa Chang, NPR News, the Capitol.


Wow, how rude of these CONs, especially the senator from Sebelius' home state! (KS was twice elected as governor of KS before Obama nominated her to be HHS Secretary.)
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sebelius Rejects Bipartis...