Cuts in Hospital Subsidies Threaten Safety-Net Care
Source: New York Times
SAVANNAH, Ga. The uninsured pour into Memorial Health hospital here: the waitress with cancer in her voice box who for two years assumed she just had a sore throat. The unemployed diabetic with a wound stretching the length of her shin. The construction worker who could no longer breathe on his own after weeks of untreated asthma attacks and had to be put on a respirator.
Many of these patients were expected to gain health coverage under the Affordable Care Act through a major expansion of Medicaid, the medical insurance program for the poor. But after the Supreme Court in 2012 gave states the right to opt out, Georgia, like about half the states, almost all of them Republican-led, refused to broaden the program.
Now, in a perverse twist, many of the poor people who rely on safety-net hospitals like Memorial will be doubly unlucky. A government subsidy, little known outside health policy circles but critical to the hospitals survival, is being sharply reduced under the new health law.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/09/health/cuts-in-hospital-subsidies-threaten-safety-net-care.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20131109&_r=0
Here's hoping the hospitals administrators get on all the republican governors, who opted out of the major expansion of Medicaid, under the Affordable Care Act. If there is enough pressure, maybe they will 'opt back in' so the program can help all the people who need it.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)And Obama's message was "Oh don't worry about that. That is just cuts to providers -- you know, those big evil, rich corporations. It won't affect any voters."
Not so much.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)about to occur in states that refused to accept The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act's Medicaid Expansion. How many will die in the waiting room? Republicans will soon begin facing their irresponsibility for touting the demise of the ACA.
bobGandolf
(871 posts)most likely us.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)get the shaft again. To tell you the truth, my small town is filled with the poor,they feel so unimportant they don't even care if they live or die.
And with my state not expanding medicaid,their lives with be shittier than before,no free or lower price ER visits for them,when they are very ill.
The working poor have been getting shafted quite regularly. It does piss me off how many 'working poor' are teabaggers, constantly shooting themselves in the foot.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)Most of the working poor in rural areas do vote republican. And with the republican led legislatures turning down the medicaid expansion,
hurting the working poor,they don't even realize what the people they elected have done to them.They blame Pres. Obama. Probably why these republican states turned down medicaid expansion,they couldn't let the people get healthcare,that might make them appreciate what a democratic President did for them.
bobGandolf
(871 posts)Not sure why so few people responded though.
I had totally forgotten about that cut. Quite concerned how this will all turn out. With the damn republicans, literally, trying to sabotage the ACA at every turn, I'm very worried about its survival, let alone refining the program to make it better.
Pennie109
(128 posts)and it's the same as Savannah. It's disgusting. Governor Haley says it's too expensive to have the medicaid expansion, ACA or anything to benefit the poor and middle class. Yet they have nothing to replace it with and do everything to sabotage ACA and scare people in not signing up.
People may be smartening up though. The county next to mine wanted to institute a sales tax to go towards people's property tax. It would only benefit the rich. Thank goodness it was voted down.
Disgusting.
bobGandolf
(871 posts)a tax only on luxury items.
Morphia
(49 posts)One thing I have observed in the last few years while reading the news and comment sections is a large number of comments made by people in the states that refused to expand Medicaid wanting the poor to just go away and move to blue states or just out right die.
Another way to look at is it that the Red States know full well they can abuse the poor any way they want because in the end the Blue states will pick up the tab for them. This will continue as long as the current economic arrangement between the states as it pertains to federal funding remains in place.
bobGandolf
(871 posts)Not sure if you mean repercussions, through federal funding, of the red states that continually screw the poor, but I think it would work.