Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,018 posts)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 07:28 PM Nov 2013

President Obama's job approval ratings plunge

Source: McClatchy DC

President Barack Obama's job approval ratings have sunk to an historic low in a national poll released Tuesday, following a month of bad headlines chronicling the error prone rollout of his health care law.

American voters disapprove of the job Obama is doing by a 54 percent to 39 percent margin -- his lowest approval rating in any Quinnipiac University national poll since he became president in 2009. Even women -- Obama's biggest supporters -- disapprove of his performance by 51 percent to 40 percent.

The numbers are a slide from the 49 percent to 45 percent disapproval rating Obama had in a similar poll on Oct. 1. His lowest score before today was a 55 percent to 41 percent disapproval in an Oct. 6, 2011 survey by the university.

The poll found disapproval at 58 percent to 37 percent among men, 91 percent to 6 percent among Republicans and 63 percent to 30 percent among independent voters.

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/11/12/208336/president-obamas-job-approval.html



Full poll: http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-and-centers/polling-institute/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=1975
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama's job approval ratings plunge (Original Post) alp227 Nov 2013 OP
must mean he is doing his job. nt DeadEyeDyck Nov 2013 #1
It didn't when * was president. n/t Psephos Nov 2013 #3
Because George W's was in the 20s Blue_Tires Nov 2013 #5
* had a higher poll number than Obama at comparable point in presidency Psephos Nov 2013 #13
So, being "logical", WHAT do the fuckin' poll numbers mean to YOU, then? Blue_Tires Nov 2013 #17
They mean to me that a lot of people who believed Obama's campaign promises are disappointed. Ace Acme Nov 2013 #18
To me, they mean Blue_Tires Nov 2013 #20
The rate and direction of change is the most important thing. nt Ace Acme Nov 2013 #31
When W's numbers were still in the 30's, did it mean he was "doing his job"? McXorsett Nov 2013 #32
CNN is excited JI7 Nov 2013 #2
Hitting Bush levels Dopers_Greed Nov 2013 #4
Can't govern by poles GreydeeThos Nov 2013 #6
Right. Just look at Poland to see how government by poles works out. nt Ace Acme Nov 2013 #8
SCHEDULING ACE ACME FOR ASS KICKING Skittles Nov 2013 #10
I was married to one once. Ace Acme Nov 2013 #11
.... DeSwiss Nov 2013 #24
Are we talking about Polish poles or the strip joint variety. Beacool Nov 2013 #15
Or a Pole on a pole. AngryAmish Nov 2013 #19
Or a pole in a Pole. nt Ace Acme Nov 2013 #21
Wow, I bet she gets lots of tips. Beacool Nov 2013 #23
Too much faith in the stability of that pole jakeXT Nov 2013 #26
Weeks of media bashing will do that to ya! savalez Nov 2013 #7
No wonder Bill Clinton is taking a different stance on the ACA. Skarbrowe Nov 2013 #9
We need an army of Democratic Governors, Senators, and Representatives out supporting the ACA truthisfreedom Nov 2013 #12
The Administration FAILED at communication..... Swede Atlanta Nov 2013 #28
Well there goes the election. truthisfreedom Nov 2013 #14
Meh, that's part of governing. Beacool Nov 2013 #16
+1 Dawson Leery Nov 2013 #22
they'll go back up next year pothos Nov 2013 #25
This will pass. tblue Nov 2013 #27
That's really going to hurt him ... Cigar11 Nov 2013 #29
but ONLY a DLC Democrat can ever win the White House... yurbud Nov 2013 #30
Didn't the DLC dissolve in 2011? Jamaal510 Nov 2013 #34
they did a name change. Sort of like Blackwater yurbud Nov 2013 #35
This is nothing to get too concerned about. Jamaal510 Nov 2013 #33

Psephos

(8,032 posts)
13. * had a higher poll number than Obama at comparable point in presidency
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 01:36 AM
Nov 2013

Which negates the original "doing his job" comment.

Anyway, either you're making your argument against the parent post I was referring to, or mine, but not both. Unless logic is unimportant to you.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
17. So, being "logical", WHAT do the fuckin' poll numbers mean to YOU, then?
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 12:22 PM
Nov 2013

Since they are lower than Bush's at a comparable point?

I'm anxious to read your detailed analysis...

 

Ace Acme

(1,464 posts)
18. They mean to me that a lot of people who believed Obama's campaign promises are disappointed.
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 03:21 PM
Nov 2013

What do they mean to you?

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
20. To me, they mean
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 03:35 PM
Nov 2013

the old axiom saying "A coach is only as good as his last victory" rings true...

People are understandably fickle, and if you look at what were the three most prominent stories in the weeks leading up to this poll (healthcare implementation and the website mess, the government shutdown which many voters still blame Obama for, and the NSA/eavesdropping on foreign heads of state), it's easy to see where peoples' minds were...

Reading a poll is like seeing a photograph of a river and trying to determine the water depth, speed, temperature and if the tide is rising or falling, imo....

 

McXorsett

(21 posts)
32. When W's numbers were still in the 30's, did it mean he was "doing his job"?
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 04:59 PM
Nov 2013

Or the theory that when a President's approval is in the 30's he is doing his job only holds for some?

Look, I believe Obama is an ok President and Bush is an absolutely terrible one. But approval in the 30's doesn't necessarily mean that one President is doing his job. It's simply people's opinions.

GreydeeThos

(958 posts)
6. Can't govern by poles
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 07:59 PM
Nov 2013

I would say keep on message.
Continue with the current policies.

We can't let a technical glitch in a web site get magnified by a bunch of teabaggers until it changes what we are doing.

Ignore the poles and get on with fixing this country.

Skittles

(153,150 posts)
10. SCHEDULING ACE ACME FOR ASS KICKING
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 10:20 PM
Nov 2013

FOR BEING FASTER THAN ME WITH A REPLY REFERENCING POLISH FOLK

 

Ace Acme

(1,464 posts)
11. I was married to one once.
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 10:34 PM
Nov 2013

I miss her every day. A marriage has no tiebreaker, so our government was a deadlocked democracy. Sometimes I watch Anna Maria Jopek videos and cry.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
15. Are we talking about Polish poles or the strip joint variety.
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 10:47 AM
Nov 2013

I just want to get my poles straight.

savalez

(3,517 posts)
7. Weeks of media bashing will do that to ya!
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 08:01 PM
Nov 2013

But wasn't Bush at like 25%?

Can you imagine if Obama had a congress to work with? He'd be riding high. Instead he's saddled with Cry Baby Boner.

Skarbrowe

(1,083 posts)
9. No wonder Bill Clinton is taking a different stance on the ACA.
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 08:22 PM
Nov 2013

Bill Clinton is trying to get the Obama administration to let the people who have lost their insurance have a chance to get it back. Wouldn't that be defeating the purpose of all insurance companies offering the listed coverage under the ACA? It would totally screw the numbers of people getting the correct insurance all to hell. But, maybe it's time the Clintons distance themselves from Obama. I mean, maybe that's what they're thinking with these kind of Obama numbers. ?

I am not knocking President Obama. There is a lot to be upset about with lousy roll-out of a mandated insurance program. Personally, I think it will all work out in a few months. And, saying that, I might as well agree with people who think the mandated part should be pushed back to cover this extra time for the fix-up. Also, I think Obama's numbers will go back up when (if?) they get the ACA fixed.

truthisfreedom

(23,145 posts)
12. We need an army of Democratic Governors, Senators, and Representatives out supporting the ACA
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 10:42 PM
Nov 2013

On television and in the media, making YouTube vids and doing interviews!

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
28. The Administration FAILED at communication.....
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 04:21 PM
Nov 2013

I said long ago that they needed an entire media campaign as big at their re-selection campaign to

market the ACA, its benefits, etc.

They FAILED to do this and this is what they get now.

They should have had point people and not the meek Secretary Sibelius (I respect her but she doesn't have a strong persona or voice) to immediately acknowledge the issues with the website and the cancelled policies.

They needed someone who was the voice of stability and consistency throughout...perhaps a HealthCare Tsar? I don't know...

But they squandered an opportunity.

I support this President and the ACA but I think they bungled many things that could have been opportunities.

truthisfreedom

(23,145 posts)
14. Well there goes the election.
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 07:42 AM
Nov 2013

And we had such high hopes.

insert sarcasm thingie here

Congress is at 9%. That's less than 25% of Obama's approval.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
16. Meh, that's part of governing.
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 10:50 AM
Nov 2013

Sometimes your numbers are up, sometimes they are down. It would be worrisome if this was late summer next year, but there's plenty of time to fix the website problems before the midterm elections.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
22. +1
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 03:52 PM
Nov 2013

The "liberal" media is part of the problem too. They have been playing up everyone that has gone wrong while ignoring the things that have gone well.

tblue

(16,350 posts)
27. This will pass.
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 04:19 PM
Nov 2013

The news about the website is bad. But it really isn't that serious. Honestly. This is temporary.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
35. they did a name change. Sort of like Blackwater
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 01:09 AM
Nov 2013

once everybody figures out what the new name represents, they'll have to change it again.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
33. This is nothing to get too concerned about.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 12:34 AM
Nov 2013

Approval ratings rise and fall all the time, plus Obama won't run for re-election anymore. He's been doing his job all along to the best of his ability. It's the other side that has been impeding progress. Lucky for them, the average American is not too informed about basic civics and our checks-and-balances system, so they automatically blame the guy at the top.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»President Obama's job app...