Afghan opium crop hits record high ahead of Western withdrawal - U.N.
Source: Reuters
(Reuters) - Afghan opium cultivation has hit a record high as international forces prepare to leave the country, the United Nations said on Wednesday, with concern that profits will go to warlords jockeying for power ahead of a presidential election next year.
The expansion of poppy to 209,000 hectares (516,000 acres), will embarrass Afghanistan's aid donors after more than 10 years of efforts to wean farmers off the crop, fight corruption and cut links between drugs and the Taliban insurgency.
"The short-term prognosis is not positive," said Jean-Luc Lemahieu, head of the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) in Afghanistan.
"The illicit economy is establishing itself, and seems to be taking over in importance from the licit economy."
Afghanistan is the world's top cultivator of the poppy, from which opium and heroin are produced. Last year, it accounted for 75 percent of global supply and Lemahieu had previously said this year it might supply 90 percent.
Read more: http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/11/13/uk-afghanistan-opium-idUKBRE9AC06V20131113
delrem
(9,688 posts)Am I wrong?
I remember in the days of the Vietnam war (that isn't how the Vietnamese name it, but .. ho.. hum), that opium was the narcotic of choice for the CIA/military. Suddenly the supply in the golden triangle found a way to market.
I think in those days we had a more honest or, perhaps, less corrupt press.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)but they lack control over the situation.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)but they actively sold it themselves to raise funds for their war machine with the tacit help of Pakistani ISI.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)We know the Taliban eradicated the poppies in the fields.
NATO seems to guard the fields and work with the drug lords.
Question is, who controls the trade going out of Afghanistan and the money?
Ace Acme
(1,464 posts)BBC says that a former Pakistani diplomat was told in July 2001 that a military operation to overthrow Taliban was being planned for mid-October, before the snow falls. (3)
The US began bombing on October 7. Kabul fell a month later, and the opium crop in 2002 was of normal levels. I don't know what all kind of industrial effort it takes to seed a country's opium crop, but I'm impressed that the stuff could be banned in 2001 and have a normal crop in 2002 (planting season is mid-October to mid-November (1)). This suggests to me that suppliers of seeds anticipated the change in the opium policy and were ready to distribute the seeds. By 2004, production was at an all-time high, with 140,000 hectares in cultivation. (2) Currently 209,000 hectares are in cultivation. (1)
Afghanistan has a million opium addicts. One of the reasons the Soviet invasion failed is because so many of their soldiers became addicts. The possibility that many of our troops there have nasty opium habits is something I've never seen discussed.
It's pretty hard to hide a field full of red poppies.
1.http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=244926635
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Afghanistan_opium_poppy_cultivation_1994-2007b.PNG
3. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1550366.stm
iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)but it still went on...
local warlords make tons of money off it and it supports local poor farmers ... so even the Taliban would let them get away with it...
but yes, their public stance is that mind altering substances are against the muslim faith :p
there are tons of documentaries about this subject, should be able to find one if curious...
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Opium makes then alot of money.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)dotymed
(5,610 posts)"We" have soldiers risking their lives daily to protect the heroin dealers crops.
I believe that commercial poppy farming is illegal world-wide, even in Afghanistan.
How openly corrupt can "our" administration be?
Guard the oil and poppy fields. This is what our soldiers are told.
I was watching "Mobsters" on teevee yesterday. At the end of the show (based on actual events), they told what happened to each major mobster in the film.
Most died peacefully after Lucky Luciano took over and installed a board of directors instead of one capo. He modeled this after large corporations.
Mayer Lansky (they had many Jewish mobsters too) "died peacefully in his sleep, of old age, as one of the richest men in America."
Has wall st. taken over the mob or has the mob taken over wall st.?
In the end it is all the same. The thieves and murderers become very wealthy (and socially "rock stars" while hard work and obeying the rules get you nowhere.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)on drugs."
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)leftyladyfrommo
(18,864 posts)problem they have in Afghanistan. Whole families are addicted.
They have a huge meth addiction problem in N. Korea.
But, you know, if I had to live like those poor people do I would probably be an addict, too. Their daily lives are just so hard.
Ace Acme
(1,464 posts)I understand that addiction was a factor in the USSR's inability to prevail in their ten-year war there.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,864 posts)It wouldn't surprise me at all if heroin use isn't a problem with the troops.
Ace Acme
(1,464 posts)But since there's been no exposure of any problem I wonder if they've been keeping the problem troops in field to delay the day when they come home and reveal the problem.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)presided over dramatic increases in output?
A Brit ambassador to neighboring Uzbekistan had a great column on what he saw, though he didn't quite connect all the dots:
It now exports not opium, but heroin. Opium is converted into heroin on an industrial scale, not in kitchens but in factories. Millions of gallons of the chemicals needed for this process are shipped into Afghanistan by tanker. The tankers and bulk opium lorries on the way to the factories share the roads, improved by American aid, with Nato troops.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-469983/Britain-protecting-biggest-heroin-crop-time.html#ixzz2kXp0hho8
UN report on drug money keeping banks afloat:
https://web.archive.org/web/20091108072620/http://www.vancouversun.com/news/story.html?id=1269889
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Putting pressure on the opium economy threatens to drive farmers and others into the arms of the Taliban, undercutting war on terror efforts.
It's a no-win choice for the West: Attack opium and alienate large numbers of the population, or let it alone and allow the Taliban to buy lots of shiny new weapons with the profits.
benld74
(9,901 posts)Response to dipsydoodle (Original post)
Jesus Malverde This message was self-deleted by its author.