Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,376 posts)
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 11:10 AM Nov 2013

The GOP's Primary Shakeup Plot

Source: The Daily Beast

The national Republican Party is considering a number of major changes to its presidential nominating process to avoid a repeat of the debacles of 2012, according to several party officials.

Most significantly, the party is considering holding a “Midwestern primary” featuring Great Lakes states such as Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin that would come immediately after the votes in the traditional early primary states. Also being weighed and thought likely to be approved when the Republican National Committee meets in early 2014 is a plan to shorten the primary season considerably by holding the party’s convention in July, almost as soon as the last primary ballots are cast.

The move toward a “Midwestern Super Tuesday” after the early primary states of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Florida appears aimed in part at wresting control of the nominating process from social conservatives in the South in an effort to produce a nominee more likely to carry the election in November. Nearly all the “Rust Belt” states have fallen into Democratic hands in recent elections, and GOP officials believe that showering them with more resources throughout the primary process—and ensuring that an eventual nominee is broadly popular there—could flip the Midwest into the Republican column in November.

Read more: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/11/14/republican-party-weighs-a-2016-shakeup-with-midwestern-primary.html



This assumes that the State Governments, which generally pay for the Primary, are willing to move the dates, and that Democratic Primaries move as well. Otherwise the Tea Party Legislature would have to pay extra money for double primaries.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

alfredo

(60,071 posts)
1. I don't see the states going along with this. It would also
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 11:19 AM
Nov 2013

favor presidential candidates with the most money.

marble falls

(57,014 posts)
2. Too bad the dog let the tail take over. Don't want to repeat last election - put the Tea Genie......
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 11:21 AM
Nov 2013

back into the bottle. Good luck with that. A Tea third party would result.

Dopers_Greed

(2,640 posts)
4. I suppose I should call-in to the talk radio shows
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 11:33 AM
Nov 2013

As a "concerned conservative" worrying that the RINO Republican Establishment is trying to suppress the Tea Party

calimary

(81,127 posts)
7. Oh yeah! ANYTHING that forces the teabaggers to have to spend more money
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 12:26 PM
Nov 2013

that they'd ordinarily pour into hatchet-job ads against Dems! Force 'em to squander more money that they weren't budgeting for things like this! MORE!!!

I think that we ought to take a page from what the republi-CONS are trying to do against the ACA. And voting rights. And women's rights. And more. Figure out EVERY and ANY way to put a kink in the system. Put a stick in the spokes. Pour a little sugar into the engine. ANYTHING!!! Anything that hobbles and complicates and interrupts and monkeywrenches their carefully-laid plans. ANYTHING. WHATEVER slows 'em down and trips 'em up and breaks their momentum and complicates their plans! No matter how small. THAT'S what we need to do. Keep 'em busy! Keep 'em fighting little fires breaking out all around them. Keep 'em having to fill the little holes in the levee that we keep picking open, so they can't rest. And they can't focus. And they can't move forward because there are too many problems to fix before they can. And while they're tending to those, more little fires break out, and more little holes bore through and cause leaks. And they have to troubleshoot further. And they have to reassign forces and resources that were earmarked for offense. They're too busy playing defense and shoring things up. Dissipate their energy. Demoralize their troops.

Destabilize the enemy.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The GOP's Primary Shakeup...