Special Report: The Pentagon's doctored ledgers conceal epic waste
Source: Reuters
...
Every month until she retired in 2011, she says, the day came when the Navy would start dumping numbers on the Cleveland, Ohio, office of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, the Pentagon's main accounting agency. Using the data they received, Woodford and her fellow DFAS accountants there set about preparing monthly reports to square the Navy's books with the U.S. Treasury's - a balancing-the-checkbook maneuver required of all the military services and other Pentagon agencies.
And every month, they encountered the same problem. Numbers were missing. Numbers were clearly wrong. Numbers came with no explanation of how the money had been spent or which congressional appropriation it came from. "A lot of times there were issues of numbers being inaccurate," Woodford says. "We didn't have the detail
for a lot of it."
...
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/special-report-pentagons-doctored-ledgers-conceal-epic-waste-144950858--business.html
bemildred
(90,061 posts)---
The most obvious consequence of the Cold War is America's present-day military establishment with its three million fighting men, its more than one million civilian employees, its twenty-two thousand prime arms contractors and its more than two million dependent defense workers. If the oligarchs' determination to prosecute an aggressive foreign policy predates by half a century America's contemporary military machine, the political advantages of the military machine have greatly strengthened their determination. It has enabled the party oligarchs to solve what for them is a grave political problem-how to waste scores of billions of dollars a year.
The problem arises from a fundamental condition created by monopoly capitalism. That system, as Baran and Sweezy and others have demonstrated, cannot generate demand for its products and outlets for investment large enough to absorb the surplus wealth it generates. Since surplus wealth which can be neither invested nor consumed will not be produced, "the normal state of the monopoly capitalist economy is stagnation." Without the government's help, "monopoly capitalism," according to Baran and Sweezy, "would sink deeper and deeper into a bog of chronic depression." If the country is to avoid a depression and another collapse of the monopoly system, the government must stimulate demand by means of enormous annual public expenditures.
That the government must pour billions of dollars into the economy each year does not, to conventional political understanding, seem like much of a problem. It would seem to be an unparalleled opportunity for improving the general lot of the citizenry. Virtually every city, town and hamlet in America is in dire need of public revenues. 'What could be more immediately beneficial to all Americans than the allocation of a much-needed $30 billion a year out of Federal revenues to restore, improve and revive local communities? Almost everybody suffers to some degree from polluted air, polluted waterways and a despoiled and deteriorating environment. To accomplish real and sweeping environmental improvement (not just keeping things from getting worse) would cost scores of billions of dollars. What could be simpler than spending every cent required, since the money must be spent anyway? Poverty in America could be virtually eradicated with the stroke of a legislative pen and would, in addition, open vast new markets for the merchandise of the monopoly industries. Again, since the money must be spent, what could be more reasonable than eliminating poverty once and for all?
Yet the oligarchs' efforts in these and other areas have been notoriously grudging. Only the most intense public pressure gets anything done at all.
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Walter_Karp/State_Of_War_IE.html
Without lots of government waste, there are no exorbitant profits to be made.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)It explained many mysteries to me.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)The 'behind the scenes' explanation. Reading Oliver Stones "Untold history of the United States". Jives perfectly on how in the first 1893 depression the decision was made to start 'expansion' (ie taking over the islands, etc) to get the economy moving.
This will be interesting too.
Thanks
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)No wonder we can't afford food stamps.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Same goes for Red Districts in Blue States like California.
It is a jobs program. I'm picturing if we actually DID cut back on the defense budget. We could end up with a bunch of guys looking like Michael Douglas in "Falling Down". We need a transfer from weapons to transportation systems. The people designing the power grid on battleships should be designing them for downtown.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)which I did for many years - none of this would surprise you. I actually blew the whistle on WANTON waste several times. The response I got was "Shut UP!"
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Often done on programs that shouldn't even exist.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)At the end of each shift, we'd break out brooms and sweep up all the little hardware that inevitably made it's way to the floor every day. The C5 used very special bolts that held the wings to the center sections. Each bolt was different with respect to where it was to be installed. They were like a grand apiece - or more. If they fell to the floor from 30 feet up (where they were being installed) they had to go into the scrap metal bins. Never mind that there wasn't so much as a scratch on them. Doncha know the folks makin' those bolts fostered THAT policy!
What was really amazing was that I used to go to the county dump every Thursday. That was the day the trash trucks from Lockheed came and dumped stuff. What was intriguing was that there wasn't any "trash" like you'd think of. There was oodles of chunks of aluminum, magnesium, brass, copper and other such. My 3/4 ton pickup was sagging on it's springs every time I left. Made damned good money sorting and scrapping there!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)One day they threw away a bunch of little employee transports. Kinda like a golf cart with a truck bed and a two cylinder engine that burns propane. We never got one to go over 35 MPH because of the gearing.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)The whole "waste, fraud and abuse" was in full swing after the $800.00 toilet seats and $300.00 hammers. We were told that there was to be no spare parts in the shop and all spares would have to be categorically returned to supply. Instead of filling out all of the paperwork required to return the parts, they were boxed up and thrown in the dumpster with no record. This was multi millions of dollars of electronics parts, all milspec in just one shop.
I also heard stories of returning ships that would empty out offices by throwing desks, chairs, and equipment overboard to eliminate having to move inventory back to supply.
I'm sure not much has changed.
What is pathetic is that non defense agencies, that tend to be the more efficient from my experience, are severely lacking funds and equipment to perform routine analysis.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)I was involved in the SAME SORT of disposal "clean-ups"! I worked for a defense contractor and whenever they were scheduled to have an inspection by the Air Force or Navy, we'd "clean up" by throwing brand new - never used - equipment in the dumpsters! I remember throwing hundreds of thousands of dollars in brand new equipment in the trash. But we can't afford food stamps!
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)I could have been set for life selling bumble bee resistors, Mullard tubes, and gold contact circuit boards on ebay.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)I DID manage to spirit away a set of infra-red barrier lights. I still have them. Part of the reason I wanted them was because prior, I had worked at the company that made them. 25 years now - they've collected dust in the garage. Of course, if I hadn't "rescued" them they'd be landfill now.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)As soon as they put a stop to poor folks abusing food stamps and old folks draining the system with their socialist entitlement programs.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)raindaddy
(1,370 posts)A majority of US military engage in repeated fraudulent behavior, bilking taxpayers out of billions of dollars over the years. If they get caught they get a slap on the wrist only to turn around and repeat it again.
starroute
(12,977 posts)Some of it goes into black budget operations. Some lines private pockets. Some may take the form of bribes and kickbacks to keep the gravy train flowing.
Unaccountable money is what fuels any corrupt system, and the Pentagon is perhaps the biggest source of it.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)That's why we keep seeing these millionaire Representatives from rural districts.
Response to OneCrazyDiamond (Original post)
guyton This message was self-deleted by its author.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)with those of the ACA.
There's a commonality running all thru these systems failures.
LittleGirl
(8,282 posts)I am disgusted reading that and that's the nicest words I could type here.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)which isn't a compliment to Yahoo or the rest.
OneCrazyDiamond
(2,031 posts)How accurate is any news these days.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)antiquated and inefficient accounting systems instead of embracing better systems.
If the Navy used the new system to record the value of its military equipment, then it could track the equipment's "actual costs from acquisition through retirement," the IG report said.
Four Navy commands were affected air, sea, supply systems, and space and warfare. Instead of using one new system that swept up everything they controlled, the Navys financial officers juggled data from six separate, antiquated accounting systems, according to the report.
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/07/22/12984/navy-sea-lousy-books
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)this story even exists....
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)So, of course, corruption and waste will be rampant. Also, there needs to be whistle-blower protection or it will be completely covered up. It is like commanders having control over the prosecution for rape by members under their command. It guarantees failure. Every time.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)accomplished quite a bit. Obama commissioned the Rand group to study the problems and make recommendations. The Rand group worked in conjunction with the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense and came up with 12 recommendations which have been implemented. That includes a 54% increase in staff. A few defense contractor investigations resulted in:
During 2011, DCIS reviewed 138 qui tam referrals that resulted in 56 investigations. Highlights of this work include the following:
On March 23, 2012, it was announced that Lifewatch Services would resolve allegations of fraud against the company by paying an $18.5 million civil settlement.
American Grocers, Inc. case resulting in a $15 million return.
Boeing Company case resulting in a $25 million return.
Northrup Grumman case resulting in a $325 million return to the federal government.
I looked it up because I was wondering if there was a financial reward to the whistleblower like there is with Medicare fraud.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Defense_Whistleblower_Program
Xithras
(16,191 posts)And there may be as many as 5000...Including a number of ancient COBOL systems dating from the 1970's!
No WONDER they can't keep track of everything. I can't even imagine trying to reconcile data from that many different accounting systems onto a single ledger. I've done enterprise ERP installations for corporations that cost tens of millions in software development and integration charges alone, and the most complex of them didn't touch even a fraction of that number. It would be an impossible task to crosswalk that many accounting systems into anything even remotely usable. What a clusterf***!
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)or "incompetence" in these kinds of things, bear in mind it's serving some serious plunder. There are doubtless many who want to keep it this way, and -- just to heighten the joke -- will end up reaping billions more on contracts to rationalize the accounting.
The old $1000 hammer is not a mistake. It's a feature, it's the essence of what this machinery is all about.
Oh no, wait: they're defending your freedom. You wouldn't even be alive without them! Do you hate the troops?
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)packman
(16,296 posts)and was about to post the link, but this paragraph in it sums it up pretty neatly:
LittleGirl
(8,282 posts)and spoke words that can't be typed here but they were really close to WTF?
OneCrazyDiamond
(2,031 posts)not including getting their...where ever there is.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)All of us (99%) have to be accountable for every penny we make.
But a branch of the military? Accountable?
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)known as the MIC got this much attention for their accounting, it was Sept. 10, 2001, almost time for their most massive budget increases ever. That was when Rumsfeld held a press con to announce they were having trouble reconciling $2.3 trillion worth of their books!
Motherfucking hole.
No, sorry.
Sacred hole! Glorious hole! Hole that defends our freedoms! Throw more money in the hole!
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)where scum like GOv. Rick Scott got away with billions in Medicare fraud before he was finally caught. We need an outside organization to investigate and monitor govt contracts exclusively.
From article;
"Having billions of dollars of open, unaudited contracts stretching back to the 1990s is clearly unacceptable, and places taxpayer dollars at risk of misuse and mismanagement," Senator Thomas Carper, a Delaware Democrat and chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said in an email response to questions. "We must make sure that the Department of Defense is actively assessing risks and making sure that contractors who fall underneath the threshold remain accountable for their work."
View gallery."Crane operator Mark Brookin navigates his crane between
Crane operator Mark Brookin navigates his crane between shelves in the high-rise storage area of the
Spotty monitoring of contracts is one reason Pentagon personnel and contractors are able to siphon off taxpayer dollars through fraud and theft - amounting to billions of dollars in losses, according to numerous GAO reports. In many cases, Reuters found, the perpetrators were caught only after outside law-enforcement agencies stumbled onto them, or outsiders brought them to the attention of prosecutors.
In May this year, Ralph Mariano, who worked as a civilian Navy employee for 38 years, pleaded guilty in federal court in Rhode Island to charges of conspiracy and theft of government funds related to a kickback scheme that cost the Navy $18 million from 1996 to 2011. Mariano was sentenced November 1 to 10 years in prison and fined $18 million.
Mariano admitted that as an engineer at the Naval Undersea Warfare Center in Newport, Rhode Island, he added money to contracts held by Advanced Solutions for Tomorrow. The Georgia-based company then paid kickbacks to Mariano and others, including friends and relatives.
Mariano was charged more than five years after the allegations against him first emerged in a 2006 civil whistleblower lawsuit in federal court in Georgia that had been kept under seal. Court documents suggest one reason why the conspiracy went undetected for so long: The Navy not only gave Mariano authority to award money to contractors; it also put him in charge of confirming that the contractors did the work. The Navy never audited any of the contracts until after Mariano was arrested, a Navy spokeswoman confirmed.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)It's an invitation to fraud.
"The Navy never audited any of the contracts until after Mariano was arrested, a Navy spokeswoman confirmed."
benld74
(9,904 posts)AND THEY get increased each year!!!
Blue Owl
(50,325 posts)The Wizard
(12,541 posts)consumer of petroleum in the world. And Americans are too chickenshit to question the military out of fear of being labeled soft on the ism of the day, terrorism, communism.............
A nation of cowards. Home of the brave my ass. If it's the land of the free, why is everything so expensive?
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...and let the Fed quantitatively straighten things out for them.
K&R
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Do we want to stop this?
We sure could use some help from the media. Remember when a program like 60 Minutes would be all over this? Those days are long gone.
underpants
(182,717 posts)Marking for later read
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)The Government Accounting Office tried auditing the Pentagon's books. After three years, they gave it up as an impossible job.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Seriously, they did it to Acorn so easily. They did it to Meals on Wheels so easily. Why is it so hard?
unhappycamper
(60,364 posts)We christened our newest $5+ billion dollar destrpyer AND floated our $40 billion dollar USS Gerald R Ford.
From your link:
Plugs also are symptomatic of one very large problem: the Pentagon's chronic failure to keep track of its money - how much it has, how much it pays out and how much is wasted or stolen.
This is the second installment in a series in which Reuters delves into the Defense Department's inability to account for itself. The first article examined how the Pentagon's record-keeping dysfunction results in widespread pay errors that inflict financial hardship on soldiers and sap morale. This account is based on interviews with scores of current and former Defense Department officials, as well as Reuters analyses of Pentagon logistics practices, bookkeeping methods, court cases and reports by federal agencies.
As the use of plugs indicates, pay errors are only a small part of the sums that annually disappear into the vast bureaucracy that manages more than half of all annual government outlays approved by Congress. The Defense Department's 2012 budget totaled $565.8 billion, more than the annual defense budgets of the 10 next largest military spenders combined, including Russia and China. How much of that money is spent as intended is impossible to determine.
In its investigation, Reuters has found that the Pentagon is largely incapable of keeping track of its vast stores of weapons, ammunition and other supplies; thus it continues to spend money on new supplies it doesn't need and on storing others long out of date. It has amassed a backlog of more than half a trillion dollars in unaudited contracts with outside vendors; how much of that money paid for actual goods and services delivered isn't known. And it repeatedly falls prey to fraud and theft that can go undiscovered for years, often eventually detected by external law enforcement agencies.