US and UK suspend non-lethal aid for Syria rebels
Last edited Wed Dec 11, 2013, 12:48 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: BBC
The US and UK governments have suspended all "non-lethal assistance" for the opposition in northern Syria.
A US embassy spokesman in Ankara said the decision was made after Islamist rebels seized bases belonging to the Western-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA).
Fighters from the Islamic Front, a new alliance of major rebel groups, took control of the bases at the Bab al-Hawa border crossing with Turkey last week.
Humanitarian assistance by the US and UK is not expected to be affected.
Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-25331241
So, who now controls the "aid" so far sent?
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Hasn't that ever happened to you - it has to me.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)get more replies
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Peace
penultimate
(1,110 posts)Good thing we didn't give them weapons....
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)We unfortunately do not know if that includes shoulder mounted surface to air missiles that could now be used by Jihadists against western civilian targets.
U.S. to tighten mechanisms for FSA aid delivery
Read more: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2013/Nov-25/238779-us-to-tighten-mechanisms-for-fsa-aid-delivery.ashx
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)is the best choice for Syria at the moment and regime change will be a disaster.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)"The US and European countries have been reluctant to supply weapons and ammunition directly to rebel groups in Syria because of concerns that they might end up in the possession of jihadists affiliated to al-Qaeda. However, they have reportedly facilitated secret arms shipments."
Well, isn't that special?
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)With Sauda Arabia secretly doing the dirty work because the USA cannot legally arm rebels in Syria.