Poll: Republican Belief In Evolution Has Plummeted In Recent Years
Source: Talking Points Memo
Belief in evolution among Republicans has dropped more than 10 percentage points since 2009, according to a new poll by the Pew Research Center.
Pew found that 43 percent of Republicans said they believed humans and other living beings had evolved over time, down from 54 percent in 2009. More (48 percent) said they believed all living things have existed in their present form since the beginning of time.
The percentages for Democrats and independents were considerably more stable: Democratic belief in evolution went from 64 percent in 2009 to 67 percent in 2013; independent belief dipped from 67 percent in 2009 to 65 percent in 2013.
Among all American adults, 60 percent said they believe in evolution, according to Pew, and 33 percent do not.
-snip-
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/poll-republican-belief-evolution
Direct link to the Pew poll, whose results are just being published today though it was done months ago:
http://www.pewforum.org/2013/12/30/publics-views-on-human-evolution/
abq e streeter
(7,658 posts)happyslug
(14,779 posts)The reason is simple, "Believe" means you accept it as DOGMA, and as a doctrine of FAITH. I have seen Atheist said NO if the word "Believe" is used, and I have seen people who believe in God make the same objections, even through they accept evolution as the best theory to explain how we came to be on this planet. In fact fundamentalists in the 1850s were among the first to embrace the theory of evolution, saying nothing it in conflicted with the bible for the book of Genesis is allegory anyway and should NOT be taken as factual, but stories to explain how we should live.
The real fight occurred as Social Scientist adopted the theory of evolution to justify what we call Social Darwinism. The Main Line Churches rejected the concept of Social Darwinism and that was followed by the Fundamentalists. Almost all of the opposition to teaching evolution prior to WWII, was tied in with Social Darwinism (William's Jennings Byran's law forbidding the teaching of Human Evolution was tied in with a study he read about the thinking of the German High Command during WWI, and its embrace of Social Darwinism to justify the mass killing of WWI).
Since WWII, Fundamentalism had rejected Bryan's position in the Scope's Monkey Trial (Where he clearly showed the whole book prior to Abraham is a collection of Allegory stories NOT facts), but I am getting off the subject here.
Back onto the subject, thus a 1/3 of the population knows what the word "Believe" means and it looks like 2/3rd do not, again it shows a lack of education that should be corrected.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Just in the article.
The question was:
Which comes closer to your view? [READ AND RANDOMIZE] Humans and other living things have evolved over time [OR] Humans and other living things have existed in their present form since the beginning of time.
happyslug
(14,779 posts)The article says variation of the question was made, but no significant difference based on the different wording. Thus the questioned asked included:
"Which comes closer to your view? Humans have evolved over time or Humans have existed in their present form since the beginning of time",
Which comes closer to your view? Living things have evolved over time or living things have existed in their present form since the beginning of time.
Which comes closer to your view? Animals have evolved over time or Animals have existed in their present form since the beginning of time.
PEW reports no difference based on the difference in wording.
But then the people asked were given three options as answers:
Evolved over time,
Existed in present form, or
Don't know
7% said they "don't know", 33% said existed in present form and 60% opt for Evolved over time.
The question is better then I first thought, but given the restrictions in the answers not much better then I first thought. The question avoids the concept of belief, but not by much.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Was just providing the survey question so you could see that the word belief was in the article but not the survey itself.
tomg
(2,574 posts)me. I am used to odd views from fundie Republicans ( the Pew Report has interesting breakdowns; however, I would also like to see a breakdown by region and economics), but that 33% of the Democrats reject evolution as a reasonable scientific theory ( and even when one can qualify that position by accepting evolution with guiding deity) and instead accept the equivalent of "Watch me pull a fully formed, static world out of my hat as soon as I pull a hat ab nihilo" is a bit disconcerting.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)That could account, in part, for the numbers among Democrats.
That is to say, most African-Americans are Democrats and the majority of them took the "not believing in evolution" position in the survey.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)And we wonder why other nations are killing us in science.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)......at least for Republicans:
One, it may be that as the number of people self-identifying as Republicans diminishes, what's left is the hard-core Bible thumpers.
Two, it may be the effect of anti-science rhetoric coming from the wingnut radio and TV commentators these people listen to.
I strongly suspect it's a mixture of both; it would take more research to find out.
PassingFair
(22,434 posts)Festivito
(13,452 posts)They're losing the battle against gays. Soon (later for many) gay issues will be ignored in churches much the way divorces are ignored now.
The right wing needs a moniker to promote themselves without using the words Republican or Democrat. Not only does Evolution and Creationism give them these monikers, it also pays. The Koch brothers love the idea since it also keeps people from looking into reducing pollution and reducing fossil fuel use.
The rhetoric I've heard is that not believing in 6-day creation means you do deny the Bible and deny God. Horsefeathers, but they're giving it a try.
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)...in acceptance of evolution. That might be in part due to the influx of the former Republicans.
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)Rather than educating the public, we just get propaganda that is pushed to advance a political agenda.
santamargarita
(3,170 posts)adieu
(1,009 posts)people would change their views and understanding of evolution over the course of 4+ years. One doesn't "believe" in evolution. One understands how evolution works and accepts it as the mechanism for creating the variations in the flora and fauna.
What this claim shows to me is that more and more sane, rational republicans are no longer identifying themselves as republicans. Those who still call themselves republicans when asked in a poll are the few remaining ones who are not sane nor rational.
That 10% swing is not an indication of 10% of republicans changing their views. It's an indication of 10% of erstwhile republicans who no longer call themselves that.
DuaneBidoux
(4,198 posts)alp227
(32,015 posts)Because evolution is SETTLED SCIENCE.
Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
tomg This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bortman33
(102 posts)they are becoming more stupid, something I didn't believe was possible.
If they aren't at the bottom of stupid, it is really scary to contemplate what they look like when they finally arrive.
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)having an effect on their brains.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Done by brain-washing, bat-shit crazy parents.
And then there is bible thumping by preaching Pervs...and, FuksLyingNews...and...
The list seems to be now endless.
MsPithy
(809 posts)In fact, they have no ideas, just fear, distrust, hatred, cynicism and anger, 24 hours a day. They have eliminated critical thinking and anything that even approaches the ability to reason.
Controlling the base by manipulating their emotions is easier and quicker and more comprehensive (complete) than explaining policy.
republican voters are captured by authority figures in their party and their religion, and not unlike Stockholm Syndrome, whatever their captors say is what they believe.
savalez
(3,517 posts)Well said.
Edit to add that the same culprits somehow simultaneously endow them with a feeling of superiority over other political parties. Quite a skill.
Bryce Butler
(338 posts)The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it. - Neil DeGrasse Tyson
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)Skittles
(153,141 posts)we can only hope
truthisfreedom
(23,142 posts)Anyone surprised?
abq e streeter
(7,658 posts)Unless below zero is a valid IQ #.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)Julian Englis
(2,309 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)brewens
(13,566 posts)You find that with a lot of birthers too. They knew, but to keep bringing up the Kenyan thing played the base.
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)48 percent (of Republicans) said they believed all living things have existed in their present form since the beginning of time.
Do they not believe in carbon aging? What is the age of dinosaur bones versus the earliest human bones? And what about Neanderthal and modern human bones and what about the period of overlap where DNA shows some mixing may have occurred. I mean, are nearly 50% of Republicans truly that brain dead? Is the Bible one of the worst books ever written because of the damage it has done? It is a work of fiction.
benh57
(141 posts)I'm curious what the results would be if you asked if they believed in stuff like quantum mechanics -- the effects of which are required to make things like our modern computers function.
I suspect the percentages would be similar.
Then ask them how they think their laptop works.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)bullshit is bullshit calling it religion doesn't make it something other than bullshit.
the whole we need to respect their beliefs thing is bullshit too. I do not respect the beliefs of people who believe in magical, omnipotent invisible beings.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)I see it in the politics. I see in my Republican relatives, who have either withdrawn from family functions that involve progressive relatives, or make life hell for them when they bother to come. This rightward tilt into insanity has terrible impacts, both on the national and personal level.
CanonRay
(14,097 posts)since a large number of still sane Republicans have left the party, and no longer self-identify as a Republican. What's left is crazier and crazier.
riversedge
(70,182 posts)paulkienitz
(1,296 posts)broadcaster75201
(387 posts)how can ANYONE not a TeaBagging moron NOT vote? How can Dems not turn out at a 90% rate? We are as culpable as these drooling, slavering fools for the nightmare in which we find ourselves.
dregstudios
(48 posts)Here in TN, they have taken steps though new legislation to allow creationism back into the classroom. This law turns the clock back nearly 100 years here in the seemingly unprogressive South and is simply embarrassing. There is no argument against the Theory of Evolution other than that of religious doctrine. The Monkey Law only opens the door for fanatic Christianity to creep its way back into our classrooms. You can see my visual response as a Tennessean to this absurd law on my artists blog at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2012/04/pulpit-in-classroom-biblical-agenda-in.html with some evolutionary art and a little bit of simple logic.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)Monkey Trial part II. I like your artwork. I'm in Tennessee as well.
Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)DuaneBidoux
(4,198 posts)I suspect there are a number of conservatives who are increasingly embarrassed to belong to the Anti-Science Party and so have slithered away and refuse to now call themselves Republican.
Few people will go from a position of believing in evolution to not believing thus I think the most probable answer is that people who do believe in science are increasingly uncomfortable being (or at least being called) Republicans.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Julian Englis
(2,309 posts)Is this irony, denial, or their vain attempt at self preservation?
olddad56
(5,732 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Last edited Thu Jan 2, 2014, 10:39 AM - Edit history (1)
on shaky ground among baggers.
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)Good things come to those who wait.