Sarah Palin: Making Government ‘Irrelevant’ Is Goal of 2014
Source: Washington Times
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has big plans for the future of the federal government, citing one of her three New Years resolutions to bring the power back to the hands of the people.
She said on the All-American New Year, that making government as irrelevant as possible was one of her top goals for 2014. And more specifically, she said she wanted to achieve that reality by empowering the little guy, and putting the reins of government back into the hands of the people, Breitbart.com reported.
Her other two resolutions?
To eat more meat, Breitbart reported. And to live the tenets of deceased UCLA coach John the Wizard of Westwood Woodens Pyramid of Success program.
That program is what basically gives individuals their own feelings of power and industriousness, which contribute to the notion of American exceptionalism, she said
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/2/sarah-palin-making-government-irrelevant-goal-2014/
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)she forgot about that.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Arkana
(24,347 posts)since 2008.
MissMillie
(38,549 posts)she doesn't need our help
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)I keep telling him that we aren't afraid, we are fascinated by her, in exactly the same way that a train wreck is fascinating.
He has also stated a wish that she run for President in 2016, and I told him that he obviously wants whoever would be running against her to win.
The woman is an idiot, and only idiots would support her.
christx30
(6,241 posts)in a primary over a stronger GOP candidate.
Gore1FL
(21,127 posts)Does she listen to what she says?
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)global1
(25,241 posts)She said she wanted to achieve that reality by "empowering the little guy, and putting the reins of government back into the hands of the people"
flyingfysh
(1,990 posts)Marx predicted that the state would "wither away". See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withering_away_of_the_state.
So it sounds like the tea party is pushing a Communist idea???
Demeter
(85,373 posts)and boycott her. So, do not mention her name, do not post articles with her in them, do not paraphrase her insane and incomprehensible babbling, nor her family and friends, assuming she has any.
mnhtnbb
(31,382 posts)I don't think John McCain can ever be forgiven for putting her on the national stage.
Bryce Butler
(338 posts)Myrina
(12,296 posts)That's what "putting the reins of government back into the hands of the people" essentially would do ...
Bluzmann57
(12,336 posts)I mean seriously, why does anyone ever give her any pub at all?
zonkers
(5,865 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)It was confirmed when you were the Republican Vice-Presidential candidate in 2008.
- It's only gotten more absurd and worthless since......
marble falls
(57,077 posts)asjr
(10,479 posts)Alaskan red neck determined to continue to get her face in public.
jmondine
(1,649 posts)CanonRay
(14,101 posts)SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)oh I finally get it now. She wants gov't to be like her...
sinkingfeeling
(51,445 posts)or wants something. Ask those people in Oklahoma that win the drawings for free tornado shelters how they feel and they'll tell your about the bad, old federal government any day but the day they need that shelter.
dougg
(48 posts)by quitting.
cap
(7,170 posts)You did so well with Michelle Bachman with the video "We Did Stop". Can you do something similar for Sarah?
Or should we call Tina Fey?
Decisions, decisions...
Let's let the entertainers duke this out amongst themselves.
Packerowner740
(676 posts)cap
(7,170 posts)She wants to make the government as irrelevant as possible.
To empower the little guy, she wants to give him something irrelevant (government)
Somehow I don't find his empowering-- speaking from my vantage point as a little guy.
rexcat
(3,622 posts)is Somalia! I don't think that is a good idea.
diabeticman
(3,121 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)and another would be to quit taking her fashion cues from Gemma on "Sons of Anarchy"
What the hell is with "to eat more meat"?
Srkdqltr
(6,271 posts)....and everyone is jumping all over this on both sides but........ there is no substance .. she never says.. we will do without this part or that part. We will keep this part and that part. How can we know what she means when she doesn't lay out a real plan.
What will we eliminate?
What will we keep?
How will something like this work?
I can't even say that she is wrong because she doesn't really give enough information. How can anyone respond either way with this little information?
How will the little guy be empowered? and on and on...
tanyev
(42,550 posts)No quicker way to make it irrelevant than to elect Sarah Palin.
BumRushDaShow
(128,844 posts)Like China?
Russia?
Cuba?
North Korea?
spiderpig
(10,419 posts)Just because I never fail to marvel at her monumental ignorance and her inability to utter an intelligible sentence.
I know she's a grifter, a quitter, and a hypocrite - but it really seems she has no idea how stupid she is.
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)Response to big_dog (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed