U.S. Supreme Court takes up fight over TV streaming
Source: LA Times
WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal from the nations television broadcasters and decide whether to shut down a new streaming service that sends shows to consumers via the Internet for a monthly fee.
Aereo, a Brooklyn-based start-up distributor, uses small antennas to pick up over-the-air TV signals and allows a consumer to store them for later viewing. The company says its service is entirely legal since it uses the signals that a homeowner with an old-fashioned antenna could pick up as well.
But broadcasters see a major threat to their industry because Aereo is re-transmitting their copyrighted programs and not paying for them. These days, broadcasters depend heavily on revenue paid by cable and satellite companies that carry their signals, and they fear that business model will erode if cable firms are told they can take over-the-air signals for free.
The biggest TV companies, including ABC, CBS, Fox, NBC and PBS, went to court in New York and sued Aereo for violating their copyrights. They cited a provision of the law that gives a copyright holder the exclusive right to perform the copyrighted work publicly.
Read more: http://touch.latimes.com/#section/1780/article/p2p-78848720/
johnnyrocket
(1,773 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)After all, at least 5 of the 9 or owned by Wall Street.
I'm cheering for Aereo, wish they were in operation here in the Bay Area.
Orrex
(63,199 posts)I've never been able to use Aereo, but it's an intriguing concept.
2banon
(7,321 posts)I'm pissed just thinking about it. I'm so happy that I cut the strings with cable and satellite, been that way for a few years. Use Netflix, streaming and vids for cable tv series, and just air signal for local news and pbs. Considering getting a Roku, but living without that has been just fine.
I would dig to hook up with Aereo though just for a broader perspective beyond the SF Bay Area, and you know, what the hell is such a threat?
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)Have Netflix, Hulu Plus and Amazon Premium...but with Amazon Premium I also get free 2 day shipping on orders sent by Amazon..and great deals otherwise.
2banon
(7,321 posts)It's unfortunate that Netflix is being blocked from current releases on current HBO and Showtime series. Have to wait forever for each subsequent season. Still waiting for Boardwalk Empire 4 on Netflix, I think it is. (I lose track) Was thinking how similar the corruption, Boardwalk Empire's Nukky et al to Christie. Well sort of. Not that I'm asserting Christie's engaged in Illegal Trafficking, but the rest of it. Which version of Roku are you using? The original or their newer modem?
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)The Colbert Report and John Stewart...all is good!
2banon
(7,321 posts)I was referring to HBO and Showtime shows they air, which I'm hooked on. like Justified and Boardwalk Empire for instance. I'm totally addicted to these, yet have to wait so long to see recent season on Netflix, due to Industry shenanigans.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)They all show the same stuff...only one had a head phone option
2banon
(7,321 posts)last time I checked at radio shack. but I might be misremembering.. hmm. good to know, I should just opt for the original, then.
Hestia
(3,818 posts)6 months free Hulu with the purchase of the mid-range, which is more than enough. We bought 2 units, so had a year free. Haven't seen the deal since.
Hulu is my least favorite channel - slower than christmas, horrible search function, and it always seems to reset right in the middle of watching a show. But, we do get to watch shows with very little limited interruption, and we do watch the shows we like by noon the next day. Just wish they would update their servers or whatever is causing the problem.
With amazon, pricey for the prime, but we figured that instead of paying $6.59 per month, they charge it all in one whack. 6 of one, half dozen of another. There are quite a few shows that are free with prime, but nothing recent. You have to wait for those.
I forget who, but someone on DU was singing praises of Roku for months, so much so that it convinced me to buy one. Glad we did, love them.
Our directv contract ends on 28th and we are seriously thinking/more than likely completely pulling the plug too, and going air/roku only. TNT won't stream their shows unless you have a directv account - wth? - and I do refuse to pay amazon to stream their shows, so we will miss those shows, but the rest of the directv line up - meh. I'm paying for 100s of channels I refuse to watch for general principle.
Once all the providers come out with ala carte, we'll think about replugging. But until then, we'll have air (live very near the towers) and roku. But boy, we are going to miss the DVR.
2banon
(7,321 posts)Incredible rip-off, and the fact they've refused to provide ala cart, which they are certainly cable of, has always been reason enough NOT to sign a contract with their phony deals.
And by the way, I don't miss cable news what so ever. It was easy to do once I finally made my mind up. I'll occasionally watch a clip that's posted here or there which might have a bearing on something that I'm really interested in hearing, but most of the time the promo is over hyped, like a lot of headlines are on Huffpo etc. Terms like "slap down" etc might have been entertaining to watch if only it were true.
Rarely is the promo close to being as advertised, so I finally learned to ignore them and avoid "clicking" on them now. Don't miss it at all and my budget is very happy for it.
underpants
(182,739 posts)you crazy kids with your crazy stuff you do
trublu992
(489 posts)Damn Bush and his conservative appts.
bananas
(27,509 posts)Thanks for posting this story, someone was telling me about this a while back and I didn't understand what they meant.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-supreme-court-tv-streaming-20140110,0,2228237.story
quadrature
(2,049 posts)at the viewer's home,
or
by/at Aereo?
hunter
(38,309 posts)I will only pay for stuff I want to see. I won't waste any money or time on stuff I don't want to see.
A bit of advertising doesn't bother me. The ads I see on some technical sites are well directed. The ads I see on the other internet sites I use, or see in the newspapers I read, are unobtrusive. It takes no time or effort to ignore advertising I don't want to see. I don't have adobe flash installed on my computer so I don't see any moving noisy ads on my computer. I bought a star here on DU. I kill unwanted cookies without mercy.
Basically if someone wants to make it difficult for me to see their art, or doesn't want me to share or store their art, then I oblige them and don't do any of those things. There's more art in the public domain, more shared art, and so many artists that I can support without some giant corporate middlemen sucking away most of the profits, that there is no reason for me to participate in that corporate economy. I don't need Microsoft, Apple, Sony, the television networks, or anyone else standing between me and the arts I enjoy, don't need any corporate suits making a far better living than the artists I enjoy.
If the big TV corporations don't want me to see their stuff using open source operating systems, if they don't want me storing stuff to watch later, then fine, I will oblige them.
There's enough art on places like http://www.gutenberg.org, open source software sites, and within my community that my personal universe will never be dark. If I'm ever isolated entirely from both corporate and community art world, I will make my own, even if my mind is my only canvas.