New York agrees $18m settlement with 2004 Republican convention protesters
Source: The Guardian
Ed Pilkington in New York
theguardian.com, Wednesday 15 January 2014 17.10 GMT
The city of New York has agreed to pay $18m to settle a civil rights claim from hundreds of protesters who were rounded up and detained in overcrowded and dirty conditions after they rallied outside the 2004 Republican National Convention.
The settlement, between city hall and almost 500 individuals, brings to an end a long-running sore between the overwhelmingly peaceful protesters and the New York police department that had been pursuing aggressive surveillance and detention tactics in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. More than 1,800 people, including teenagers and many uninvolved bystanders, were caught up in the massive police sweep outside the convention that was held to mark the nomination of George W Bush for a second presidential term.
Lawyers acting on behalf of the protesters renamed Pier 57, the then disused former bus depot in Manhattan where those arrested were taken, Guantánamo on the Hudson. All that was missing were the orange jumpsuits. Under the guise of terrorism and the fear of terrorism, we are all losing our rights, Jonathan Moore, the lawyer who filed the original lawsuit a few months after the convention, said at the time .
Pier 57 was not properly adapted for use as a detention center. In it, detained individuals were herded 30 or 40 at a time into 10ft by 20ft pens.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/15/new-york-agrees-settlement-2004-republican-convention
Stuart G
(38,359 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)There is a way for Cities to avoid this kind of a pay-out in the future:
Don't allow your police forces to act like gangs of sadistic thugs high on methamphetamine!
AleksS
(1,665 posts)And only 10 years later!
Good job NYC! Sarcasm? I'm not entirely sure. Mostly? Partly? I mean it's good that a settlement was reached. But 10 years? Yes, yes, yes, better late than never, but seriously, 10 years? How many of the plaintiffs are unreachable anymore, or passed away, etc. etc. etc.
Beware the swift sword of justice!
Cha
(295,899 posts)Restitution payment!
mpcamb
(2,854 posts)Bloomberg saying here, you take care of this; "let it be on your record , not mine, DESPITE the fact that that's when the incident took place and got litigated."
Orsino
(37,428 posts)I guess it didn't really happen, like Guantanamo.