CNN sorry after clumsy edit shows Hillary Clinton ‘laughing about’ Benghazi deaths
Source: RawStory.com
CNN apologized on Monday after a video edit made it appear that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was laughing about the Americans who died in Benghazi.
Speaking at the National Automobile Dealers Association, Clinton said that the deaths of Americans during the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi were her biggest regret while serving as secretary of state.
But that statement was immediately followed by laughter from Clinton while the words Hillary: Biggest Regret Is Benghazi remained on the screen.
It was not immediately clear from the editing that CNN had transitioned into a second portion of the question-and-answer session about the 2016 presidential race.
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/27/cnn-sorry-after-clumsy-edit-shows-hillary-clinton-laughing-about-benghazi-deaths/
You can see the video itself by clicking the link above.
Smooth CNN. Real smooth.
Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)meegbear
(25,438 posts)I just saw the embedded one on the page.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)smh
No way that should have been aired...
DFW
(54,302 posts)I've been inside TV studios. Unless it's a live segment (which very few are), these things are edited and run through before they are broadcast.. They have to be, as time is allotted for the various subjects and segments in seconds.
This is like Fox Noise "apologizing" for putting up a "-D" in front of some Republican who just disgraced himself in public. They no more regret their "error" than they offer advertising slots on major sports events for free. It was deliberate.
Sure. In the hectic pace of television, things can go wrong. But it's not a stretch to imagine that this "mistake" was more likely an intentional one.
And I don't even like Hillary. I just despise liars way more.
DFW
(54,302 posts)But when editing a segment of a few seconds, it's easy to edit and slant what is shown to mean something the original segment did not.
I could live with Hillary and like her personally, but this kind of stuff ALWAYS seems to happen to Democrats in general. I say "seems to" because when it could have been deliberate, where editing is involved, it usually was.
MindMover
(5,016 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)That is one of the reasons I don't think she should be our candidate.
I don't understand why, but even when she was in the White House, everyone enjoyed picking on her. It is something about her personality that seems to attract that.
There was absolutely nothing behind the Whitewater scandal or the accusation that she had a role in the suicide of Vince Foster. But so many people believed the lies about her.
Maybe it is that she reminds people of the know-it-all good-girl who tattled too much in the first grade, but this is the reality that she has to deal with.
I don't think she should run. I really don't think so at all.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)They pick on her in part because she prickles up. Not the way to handle attacks. Obama deals with attacks very well. He doesn't brace himself or prickle up or frown in an angry way. He just listens, acknowledges whatever is true in the attack and corrects calmly and with facts and either a nonchalant look on his face or sometimes a smile the incorrect facts of the hecklers. Obama is master at handling difficult people. Hillary gets mad. She may try to hide it, but she wants very much to feel that she is right and that others agree that she is right. Too much pride. She needs to relax a lot.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Yeah right.
jsr
(7,712 posts)olddad56
(5,732 posts)as if it were a mistake or an accident.
They know what they are doing
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Remember Fatboy's "Whitehouse dog"?
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)or any mistakes with repuke videos.
Funny, yeah, not haha funny.
Merlot
(9,696 posts)Looked very pre-meditated, not accidental.
Blue Owl
(50,291 posts)<>