Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 03:59 PM Jan 2014

Report May Ease Way to Approval of Keystone Pipeline

Source: New York Times

WASHINGTON — The State Department released a report on Friday that could pave the way toward President Obama’s approval of the Keystone XL oil pipeline.

The long-awaited environmental impact statement on the project concludes that approval or denial of the pipeline, which would carry 830,000 barrels of oil a day from Alberta to the Gulf Coast, is unlikely to prompt oil companies to change the rate of their extraction of carbon-heavy tar sands oil, a State Department official said. Either way, the tar sands oil, which produces significantly more planet-warming carbon pollution than standard methods of drilling, is coming out of the ground, the report says.

In his second term, Mr. Obama has sought to make his fight against climate change a cornerstone of his legacy. In a major speech on the environment last summer, Mr. Obama said that he would approve the pipeline only if it would not “significantly exacerbate” the problem of carbon pollution. He said the pipeline’s net effects on the climate would be “absolutely critical” to his decision.

The conclusions of the report appear to indicate that the project has passed Mr. Obama’s climate criteria, an outcome expected to outrage environmentalists, who have rallied, protested, marched and been arrested in demonstrations around the country against the pipeline.


Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/01/us/politics/report-may-ease-way-to-approval-of-keystone-pipeline.html

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
1. Now it seems this administration's fight against the climate itself will be a "cornerstone
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 04:02 PM
Jan 2014

...of his legacy."

Which will be just as shitty as the "legacies" of nearly all the other Presidents who preceded him.

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
3. +1000
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 04:22 PM
Jan 2014

Who wrote that fucking report, anyway, Koch Industries?


Mother Flubber, I can't believe the crock of shit & the accompanying disaster is actually going to pass.
How can those assholes in DC look themselves in the mirror?


Recursion

(56,582 posts)
10. It did, and US manufacturing wages went up after NAFTA passed
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 02:13 AM
Feb 2014

I mean, I know you're kidding, but that's what actually happened. The late '90s were a pretty good time.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
11. You're seriously claiming that NAFTA created jobs in the US?
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 02:16 AM
Feb 2014

A net creation of jobs?

Even the people involved in that infernal thing don't claim that anymore.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
12. Absolutely. Just look at the numbers
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 02:28 AM
Feb 2014

NAFTA arrested the free fall manufacturing wages were in:



Manufacturing wages went up. Manufacturing output went up. Manufacturing jobs continued to decline as a percentage of the economy at exactly the same rate they have been since the 1950s (though since that was a rapidly growing economy, thanks largely to trade, that drop doesn't always represent an absolute decrease in jobs, though it often does):



US manufacturing output has been going up, but never as fast as it was right after NAFTA passed.

This also led to higher median wages overall, until W's disastrous and destructive tax cuts:



Trade + redistributive taxes/spending + strong labor laws is a good way to a prosperous society -- look at Western Europe.

Overall employment rate? Check it out:



Again: things got better after NAFTA until the disastrous Bush tax cuts.

More to the point: stopping or rolling back trade doesn't solve the problems of not having high enough revenues or high enough social spending. In some ways it makes them worse, since the "pie" gets smaller.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
9. State Department environmental review OKs Keystone XL pipeline
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 10:59 PM
Jan 2014

The long-delayed Keystone XL oil pipeline cleared a major hurdle Friday when the U.S. State Department reported no major environmental obections to the proposed $7 billion project.

The State Department's Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement is a blow to environmentalists fighting against the project, which they hope President Barack Obama will block.

The release of the environmental review starts the clock running on another review period, during which eight U.S. federal agencies will have 90 days to comment on whether Keystone XL is in the national interest.

Some agencies, including the Departments of Defense, Commerce and Energy, are expected to focus on the energy security and economic case for the pipeline

http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/1/31/keystone-xl-pipelinereviewreleasedbystatedepartment.html

AdHocSolver

(2,561 posts)
13. Since we aren't going to have any influence on what Canada does, just capitulate.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 02:57 AM
Feb 2014

The lamest excuse we have heard yet.

The President's job is NOT to regulate what happens in Canada.

The U.S. President's job is to protect Americans from experiencing the destruction of the American environment and the devastation of American lives when, NOT IF, but when the next environmental accident occurs on American soil.

How many times must chemical leaks, fires, explosions, injuries, and property damage occur on American soil before our "fearless" leaders say, "Enough!"

When is BP going to pay the full damage amount for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill?

Who is going to pay for the West Virginia chemical spill?

It is time for the U.S. government to prevent the destruction from happening in the first place.



truthisfreedom

(23,143 posts)
14. I have to say, hauling oil by rail has been so disastrous
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:12 AM
Feb 2014

That the pipeline is looking more attractive every day.

We need more wind, solar, and geothermal, plus research into thorium reactors.

drynberg

(1,648 posts)
15. BILL McKIBBEN IS RIGHT:
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:23 AM
Feb 2014

Passage of the KXL is "Game Over" for Global Climate Change, and once we pass the point of "no-return" it'll be too late and we will all be in for a terrible future. All this chatter about rails and jobs is so nice, but irrelevant. This decision about KXL is larger than any of we mere mortals can imagine...Heaven help us.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
16. I love the pretense that their desired outcome:
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:39 AM
Feb 2014

"Either way, the tar sands oil ... is coming out out of the ground" is inevitable.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
17. NOT significantly exacerbate
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:53 AM
Feb 2014

So if it only exacerbates the problem somewhat, that's ok? His campaigns and speeches are as bullshit-ridden as Bush's.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
18. O always said he would sign once the environmental impacts reports are done.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:24 AM
Feb 2014

Someone better check those reports make sure they used real science and not their 'good old boy' methods.

Plus- what about all the greenhouse gas and toxic air when they start refining that shale oil-sludge in Texas?

Bet that process is not included in any "environmental impact" report.

And what about when they start strip-mining Utah for their shale oil? That state will want to connect to the 'refine in Texas' and ship to 3rd world countries 'gravy train' someday.

There's more oil locked-up in Utah's shale than the entire of Saudi Arabia.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Report May Ease Way to Ap...