California drought: State's water deliveries to be halted
Source: San Francisco Chronicle
The California Department of Water Resources announced Friday that it expects to deliver no water from the state's vast network of reservoirs this year, the latest fallout from California's lingering drought.
Department Director Mark Cowin said at a news conference that if the dry spell continues, only carryover water from last year will be channeled to the farmers and several towns that get their water from the State Water Project.
Never in the State Water Project's 54-year history has there been zero water allocation.
"Simply put, there's not enough water in the system right now for customers to expect any water this season from the project," Cowin said in a statement to the press.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/California-drought-State-s-water-deliveries-to-5193699.php
Stuart G
(38,420 posts)I knew someone who lived in San Diego 30 years ago, and he had a feeling for history of that area.
He said, and I will never forget it that there were "Water Wars" early on in that area's history. People died over water and fights over water rights.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)the movie Chinatown was all about..
Scairp
(2,749 posts)It rained all night but it's a mere drop in the bucket, the ground is so dry. It's cold and dreary now and has been all day, so hopefully we'll get more. We need at least three days of continuous, hard rain to even make a dent.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Brown tells Californians to conserve amid drought
Associated Press
January 30, 2014 - 3:50 PM
LOS ANGELES Gov. Jerry Brown provided some very practical guidance for Californians amid a deepening drought: Take shorter showers, turn off the water while brushing teeth, and "don't flush more than you have to."
"Make no mistake, this drought is a big wakeup call," Brown said Thursday in downtown Los Angeles before meeting with local water district officials. "Hopefully it's going to rain. If it doesn't, we're going to have to act in a very strenuous way in every part of the state to get through."
The governor's pragmatic plea came as wet weather finally moved through northern portions of the state, which has been in an extraordinary dry period during what is normally the time for rain and snow.
But the stingy storm system was squeezing out only dribs and drabs of moisture in most areas. The National Weather Service office in San Francisco reported rainfall amounts since Wednesday night generally were a few hundredths to a tenth of an inch.
"Needless to say the rain is a welcome sight but does little for drought relief," the weather service wrote.
http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/242708981.html
frylock
(34,825 posts)ErikJ
(6,335 posts)tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)If it's brown flush it down, if it's yellow keep it mellow.
No car washing.
Shorter showers, or showering every other day.
No lawn watering.
No washing off the driveway.
No water served at restaurants, unless requestedthat one stuck: ever since the 80's drought, it can be impossible to get water from a waiter.
Drought police.
My dad was yelled at by a neighbor while he was watering the lawn. I don't blame the neighbor now, though, at the time, as a child, I thought the neighbor was being a jerk.
Much of these habits above, have taught me to conserve water even in plentiful seasons.
No fun...coming our way.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)I was driving down the 110 freeway on my way home from work, and we had finally received some rain.
I looked over to the side of the freeway, and noticed there were sprinklers watering the ice-plant in the rain during the drought. :/
We did get enough rain that season to cancel the drought; but it goes to show that there is a lot of work needed, on many fronts, to control water use in Southern Californiaand not just from the citizens.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)You will know how seriously the gov is about the drought when the golf courses start turning brown.
I don't believe I have ever heard of that happening tho.
And the car washes will still be open, ya think?
Actually, did not mean to leavethe SW states out of the discussion....but willing to bet the courses are green all over the palce.
Auggie
(31,167 posts)Our public golf course is already mostly brown
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)They use waste water that would otherwise just seep into the ground. They built a reservoir to store it, and even run reverse osmosis to remove the salt deposits, so think they are pretty environmentally friendly.
Auggie
(31,167 posts)NickB79
(19,233 posts)Just because it isn't potable doesn't mean it's still OK to use on such wasteful endeavors as keeping a golf course green.
Fuck, how about god-damn community garden plots instead?
Lasher
(27,575 posts)They're setting a good example by using water that would otherwise seep into the ground. Why can't we let them have their golf course?
Warpy
(111,252 posts)but keep natural drought tolerant grass on the greens. It's a decent compromise, IMO, and they did it voluntarily because water is so expensive out here.
Likely they'll start doing it in California after the grass dies off completely later this year.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)There is grass that is salt tolerant for golf courses. I'm don't know if you can water it with straight salt water, but if you could use a bit of salt water and a bit of fresh water, it would be a bit better. Or perhaps do a half ass job of filtering out the salt. I'm sure a system could be designed somewhat cheap (for a major course like pebble beach) that could filter out most of the salt, but not be precise enough to filter out all. It doesn't have to be safe for human consumption, so you wouldn't need a full reverse osmosis plant.
This wouldn't do you a lot of good in NM, but would help California. (If NM encounters salt water, you have bigger problems than how to water a golf course.)
Hekate
(90,656 posts)That includes golf courses. Believe me, they would hear from the public if they didn't.
Brother Buzz
(36,417 posts)Have been for decades. I would expect them to remain green.
Back in the drought of 1976, I played on a dry course; tee's were Astroturf, fairways were brown, and the greens were stressed, but almost green. Today, that golf course is luscious and thriving on reclaimed water; they made a smart investment
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)grrrrrr!
As for the car washes. The one I go to uses recycles it's water.
I'm guessing there will be a moratorium on lawn watering, though.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)they all recycle their water. I remember the drought in the 70s. We worked it out...
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)n/t
KewlKat
(5,624 posts)I'm glad to hear that someone in CA is building a desalination plant. I never understood why none have been built until now. The colorado river has been dropping like a stone for quite some time. Let's hope other cities in CA follow suit and get building more.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Like the Saudis do. Another of those infrastructure projects that'll go nowhere unless it can be privatized and looted!
obxhead
(8,434 posts)They are primarily intended for use as a last resort, which is what its coming down to I guess.
hunter
(38,311 posts)Desalinization is only viable with solar, nuclear, and other non-carbon sources of energy.
San Onofre is shut and California's hydroelectric capacity will be severely curtailed by this drought.
Desalinization as it is practiced here in California today, the Carlsbad plant included, will only be economically viable so long as the current natural gas glut lasts.
I do not give the natural gas resurgence anywhere close to the "30 years" fracking cheery natural gas hucksters sometimes claim.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)golf course surrounding the Rose Bowl. Green as can be.
Hekate
(90,656 posts)Very often such usage has been in place since the last drought -- at least it has been in Santa Barbara and vicinity.
This is going to be very bad.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)the city of Pasadena is aware of this. The Rose Bowl is the crown jewel here.
Hekate
(90,656 posts)... big lawns suck up water, they are obvious (they are meant to be), and people whose own lawns are crispy brown get really irked. There are alternatives to just turning on the hose, when rationing starts.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)Because CA is fucked.
Hekate
(90,656 posts)tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)I heard from long time citizens, that the Pasadena City Hall has some major nepotism issues. Hearsay, I know.
But, I cherish the years I lived there: near PCC (Allen/Colorado) on Keystone.
It was so quiet at night (except New Years Eve). ...and that was fun, too.
...too hot in the summer, though. So we moved near the coast.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)year round, thanks to climate change. Wish I could live near the coast. Maybe someday before I die.
tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)olddad56
(5,732 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)And anyone using it to water lawns should be fined. And businesses (like golf courses) should be charged higher rates than for regular water use.
I am dealing with water shortage in Oregon (my spring is dried up) and I can get by (a single person) with five or six gallons a day for me, and my 18 critters. It takes some effort and is not fun, but it can be done. I usually only flush once a day, and that is with gray water from the kitchen. That does not include showers. I don't have access to showers without spring water, so I do sponge baths. But people do use a heck of a lot more water than they need to. There are showers now (not cheap) that recycle water to re-use in the shower, and they may become cheaper when everyone starts to use them out of necessity.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)is things like this always hit the poor the hardest.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I'm afraid that we will lose a lot of trees in Southern California.
Problem is, if we lose the trees, then when we finally get rain, the earth won't hold, and we will have landslides. We have to water our trees or lose them.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I live in farm and orchard country too, and we are losing our water source for all the farmers and orchardists. We have a glacier on Mt. Hood that feeds our river that feeds the irrigation systems, and it's been melting for years. After this years drought, I don't know how much damage will have been done. It's scary...and even more for you guys, because Cali is typically a lot dryer than Western Oregon.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)Rates are going up. Have been here since 2008, 147%. Going up another 8% this year.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)and when the drought is over, will the prices be reduced? I doubt it.
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)Are the oilmen going to continue to get their water?
During the low water year of 2010, conservatives screamed about saving fish not farms while billions of gallon of water was used to extract oil.
http://www.hcn.org/issues/42.21/oil-and-water-dont-mix-with-california-agriculture
http://ftp.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=California_and_fracking
olddad56
(5,732 posts)this is the most extremely dry weather I have ever seen. I have lived through a couple of droughts that have lasted several years. Nothing like this, ever. If this drought lasts a couple more years, they won't have to worry about water conservation, there will be no water to conserve.
Another thing to consider. In 86 and 97, droughts ended and the reservoirs filled to the brim in one season. Had in not been for the dry years, the Sacramento valley would have flooded.
The weather is going to get more and more extreme. When this drought is over, expect a threat of flooding.
And there are still people who deny climate change. That is the scary part.