Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 12:43 AM Feb 2014

Antonin Scalia: 'You Are Kidding Yourself If You Think' Internment Ruling Couldn't Happen Again

Source: Associated Press

HONOLULU (AP) — U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia told law students at the University of Hawaii on Monday that the nation's highest court was wrong to uphold the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II, but he wouldn't be surprised if the court issued a similar ruling during a future conflict.

Scalia was responding to a question about the court's 1944 decision in Korematsu v. United States, which upheld the convictions of Gordon Hirabayashi and Fred Korematsu for violating an order to report to an internment camp.

"Well of course Korematsu was wrong. And I think we have repudiated in a later case. But you are kidding yourself if you think the same thing will not happen again," Scalia told students and faculty during a lunchtime Q-and-A session.

Scalia cited a Latin expression meaning, "In times of war, the laws fall silent."

"That's what was going on — the panic about the war and the invasion of the Pacific and whatnot. That's what happens. It was wrong, but I would not be surprised to see it happen again, in time of war. It's no justification, but it is the reality," he said.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/03/scalia-internment-ruling_n_4720265.html

65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Antonin Scalia: 'You Are Kidding Yourself If You Think' Internment Ruling Couldn't Happen Again (Original Post) Purveyor Feb 2014 OP
Seems surprisingly honest. FiveGoodMen Feb 2014 #1
Right elleng Feb 2014 #4
I think he's being honest. We saw what happened with the Patriot Act after 9-11. SharonAnn Feb 2014 #21
Yes it does, elleng Feb 2014 #22
ack BetterThanNoSN Feb 2014 #38
My thoughts exactly. Quantess Feb 2014 #54
But not impartial. grahamhgreen Feb 2014 #50
Not impartial. Not dedicated to real freedom and justice. FiveGoodMen Feb 2014 #51
In his position, "honesty" is just disguised collaboration. The Stranger Feb 2014 #53
No argument FiveGoodMen Feb 2014 #59
If only it could just happen to him. Walk away Feb 2014 #2
Those would be my thoughts, exactly. n/t truth2power Feb 2014 #34
It's a pretty common thought. Hosnon Feb 2014 #35
Sounds like a threat 1000words Feb 2014 #3
Wake up call. The threat already exists. merrily Feb 2014 #8
Or, maybe ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #55
I'd be very happy with BlueCaliDem Feb 2014 #56
An accurate reading of our unfortunate history during wartimes & their aftermaths . . . Journeyman Feb 2014 #5
And now we get to have never ending war against "terror." merrily Feb 2014 #9
He would know... a2liberal Feb 2014 #6
Excellent point. Thanks. merrily Feb 2014 #11
Such an unprincipled fool. ronnie624 Feb 2014 #24
Bastard sakabatou Feb 2014 #7
He may be a bastard, but what he just said is a true observation of the nature of this country. AtheistCrusader Feb 2014 #10
Including him, one of our most repulsive "warts." merrily Feb 2014 #12
Exactly. He'd rule in favor of it in a hearbeat. AtheistCrusader Feb 2014 #14
Did you see Reply 6? merrily Feb 2014 #15
I see it now. AtheistCrusader Feb 2014 #16
What is it with Republicans conflating TV shows and reality? merrily Feb 2014 #18
Ya know, I was just reading that Obama changed something about that in 2011. It was while I was okaawhatever Feb 2014 #13
I will look and see what I can find. I had heard that Janet Napolitano truedelphi Feb 2014 #19
Actually when I read that quote it's what I was thinking he meant davidpdx Feb 2014 #32
I am 100% sure that he would be right there SoapBox Feb 2014 #17
next time they intern people, it will probably be based on your annual income. olddad56 Feb 2014 #20
That's called prison, and that time is now. stillwaiting Feb 2014 #36
not to mention job security for all of the guards and staff. olddad56 Feb 2014 #40
Yes, it is an insidious system. stillwaiting Feb 2014 #42
As long as we have smug, self important white males in charge convinced of their superiority. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2014 #23
This is exactly why his ass needs to go. DeSwiss Feb 2014 #25
I wonder if Saclia has been given a date when it will happen? He seems so sure of himself. blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #26
i have no doubt this will happen again... madrchsod Feb 2014 #27
I agree, it can happen again. SamKnause Feb 2014 #28
For about 6 mos. to a year after 9/11 I worried about it happening again to Muslims bluestateguy Feb 2014 #29
Hello, 9/11 freak out, GITMO & patriot act? countmyvote4real Feb 2014 #30
Numbers vary from hundreds to 1200 Muslims detained Lars39 Feb 2014 #46
He is covering his butt. bemildred Feb 2014 #31
Tony knows fascism. unhappycamper Feb 2014 #33
Some data re: Korematsu melm00se Feb 2014 #37
Notice how everybody is ignoring your troublesome facts? Lurks Often Feb 2014 #47
yup, the other thing that gets overlooked melm00se Feb 2014 #49
interned, not interred (!) unblock Feb 2014 #57
oops...fixed melm00se Feb 2014 #58
Sounds like a good reason to keep right-wing pigs off of the court. onehandle Feb 2014 #39
Over 2 million people voted for Ralph warrant46 Feb 2014 #41
Some posters blame Nader for every evil on the planet earth. former9thward Feb 2014 #45
LOL-- NT warrant46 Feb 2014 #63
Wishful thinking on Scalia's part. (nt) Paladin Feb 2014 #43
Scalia should ask the full Court to repudiate the faulty cases. James48 Feb 2014 #44
Muslim Americans would be the most likely victims of an internment policy as a reactions to a major Douglas Carpenter Feb 2014 #48
It not only can, it will SwankyXomb Feb 2014 #52
Is that a threat or a promise? KamaAina Feb 2014 #60
It aleady has, they put an electronic fence around the whole country. Coyotl Feb 2014 #61
YEAH! heaven05 Feb 2014 #62
The mentioning of war sadoldgirl Feb 2014 #64
I got to meet and know Fred Korematsu Faygo Kid Feb 2014 #65

SharonAnn

(13,772 posts)
21. I think he's being honest. We saw what happened with the Patriot Act after 9-11.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 01:37 AM
Feb 2014

It could happen again, to our sorrow and shame.

Fear drives a lot of ugly behavior.

BetterThanNoSN

(170 posts)
38. ack
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 09:26 AM
Feb 2014

Scalia cited a Latin expression meaning, "In times of war, the laws fall silent."

Just like your court during our torture escapades, you douche

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
54. My thoughts exactly.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 12:33 PM
Feb 2014

There seems to be no statement that comes out of this horrible man that is not 100% assholish.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
51. Not impartial. Not dedicated to real freedom and justice.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 12:09 PM
Feb 2014

I'm just surprised to hear him say it that way.

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
53. In his position, "honesty" is just disguised collaboration.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 12:33 PM
Feb 2014

He is a sitting Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
59. No argument
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 01:43 PM
Feb 2014

I have nothing good to say about Scalia.

I just didn't expect him to come right out with it.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
2. If only it could just happen to him.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 12:50 AM
Feb 2014

What a jackass. Here a US Supreme Court judge says "woops when a war starts, law and your civil rights go right out the window! Too bad and don't be surprised!"

This creep thinks of himself as brilliant.

Hosnon

(7,800 posts)
35. It's a pretty common thought.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 08:48 AM
Feb 2014

"The Constitution is not a suicide pact."

I think most people would agree that our constitutional rights would be useless without a country to protect them. It's an unfortunate reality but reality nonetheless.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
8. Wake up call. The threat already exists.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 01:03 AM
Feb 2014

Much as my stomach turns when I see a photo of that smug so and so, I can't contradict this bit.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
56. I'd be very happy with
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 12:42 PM
Feb 2014

"Teabagger" Camps. They're the real enemy of the State. They're the enablers of the moneyed Plutocracy that's fighting very hard to usurp the U.S. Constitution and American democracy.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
11. Excellent point. Thanks.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 01:06 AM
Feb 2014

ETA: I wonder if Scalia would have dissented in Hamdi if a Democratic President had imprisoned him in Gitmo and Scalia's son was not "on that battlefield."

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
10. He may be a bastard, but what he just said is a true observation of the nature of this country.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 01:04 AM
Feb 2014

Warts and all.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
16. I see it now.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 01:13 AM
Feb 2014

He's also talked about torture. In the context of a FUCKING TV SHOW *gag*



"Jack Bauer saved Los Angeles. ... He saved hundreds of thousands of lives," Judge Scalia said. Then, recalling...where the agent's rough interrogation tactics saved California from a terrorist nuke, the Supreme Court judge etched a line in the sand.
"Are you going to convict Jack Bauer?" Judge Scalia challenged his fellow judges. "Say that criminal law is against him? 'You have the right to a jury trial?' Is any jury going to convict Jack Bauer? I don't think so.

"So the question is really whether we believe in these absolutes. And ought we believe in these absolutes."


He really is a vile creature.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
18. What is it with Republicans conflating TV shows and reality?
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 01:18 AM
Feb 2014

Scalia is brilliant (hate to admit), but there he sounds like Dan Quayle railing against Murphy Brown's lifestyle.

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
13. Ya know, I was just reading that Obama changed something about that in 2011. It was while I was
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 01:08 AM
Feb 2014

reading up on executive orders. Maybe someone knows before I go spend a bunch of time researching it.

Sadly, what the right wing will hear is "FEMA Camps".

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
19. I will look and see what I can find. I had heard that Janet Napolitano
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 01:35 AM
Feb 2014

Had made flying a lot easier, with less hassles from Homeland "Security."

My spouse recently travelled and he thought things were quite a bit easier and more pleasant than from two years ago.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
32. Actually when I read that quote it's what I was thinking he meant
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 07:05 AM
Feb 2014

It's kind of like using dog whistle words with racism. He was looking for a reason to set off the right-wing loons.

Maybe I'm just being paranoid.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
17. I am 100% sure that he would be right there
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 01:14 AM
Feb 2014

if he felt "panic" about some of those Moose-lamb types...or some Mexy-cans...or anyone that doesn't look like him, think like him, etc.

OH, I know a group that he would feel "panic" about...them Homer-sexuals!

stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
36. That's called prison, and that time is now.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 08:50 AM
Feb 2014

The wealthy rarely get interned.

The poor get interned often.

Gotta have labor for our prison camps don't ya know…


stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
42. Yes, it is an insidious system.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 10:16 AM
Feb 2014

Our drug laws, and how they are implemented, have resulted in thousands upon thousands upon thousands of individuals losing their freedom.

Unfortunately, these laws are also racist in that they lock up African-Americans so very much more than they ever do people from other races.

I hope our insane drug policies end soon, and I hope that future history books accurately reflect and report exactly what happened to the lives of millions of Americans because of them. Our drug laws have destroyed lives much more than the drugs themselves ever could.

Portugal has done the sane thing regarding drug policy. Rehabilitate.

For conservatives to reflect on --------> It's so much cheaper, and someone should never lose their freedom because they want to experience an altered state of consciousness.



madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
27. i have no doubt this will happen again...
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 02:59 AM
Feb 2014

if there is another attack on our "homeland" people will demand it.

yes there is no justification and yes it is reality. we only have to look at our country after 9-11 to see the future will bring.

SamKnause

(13,101 posts)
28. I agree, it can happen again.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 03:03 AM
Feb 2014

Scalia will lead the charge to implement internment if the occasion arises.

He is a despicable person.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
29. For about 6 mos. to a year after 9/11 I worried about it happening again to Muslims
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 03:36 AM
Feb 2014

And I do think the political climate of 2001-02 would have allowed it under some bullshit "national security" claim.

 

countmyvote4real

(4,023 posts)
30. Hello, 9/11 freak out, GITMO & patriot act?
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 03:44 AM
Feb 2014

This has probably already been referenced in this thread, but this is my immediate response to the OP. We're already there and have been since 9/11. Could it escalate? NSA says, "You betcha."

melm00se

(4,991 posts)
37. Some data re: Korematsu
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 09:14 AM
Feb 2014
Court Make up (appointing President in parentheses): Stone (Coolidge and Chief Justice by FDR), Roberts (Hoover), Black (FDR), Reed (FDR), Frankfurter (FDR), Douglas (FDR), Murphy (FDR), Jackson (FDR) and Rutledge (FDR)

Supreme Court Decision: 6-3

Text of Decision:
here

Decision:Stone, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Rutledge

Dissent: Roberts, Murphy and Jackson

Similar Cases: Yasui v United State, Hirabayahsi v United States, and ex parte Endo

Vacated: Korematsu was overturned in 1983.

it is interesting to note that the majority of the court were Democrats and either directly appointed to the seats on the bench by FDR (Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas,and Rutledge) or appointed as Chief Justice (Stone) by FDR.
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
47. Notice how everybody is ignoring your troublesome facts?
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 11:05 AM
Feb 2014

It was FDR that signed the order authorizing military commanders to decide if the Japanese-American citizens were a threat and if deemed a threat could be forcibly re-located. No trials, no probably cause, no appeal. Most, if not all, the Japanese-American citizens lost all their possessions except what they could carry with them in suitcases.

And as you pointed out, it was a Supreme Court, composed mostly of FDR appointees, that upheld his order.

melm00se

(4,991 posts)
49. yup, the other thing that gets overlooked
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 12:00 PM
Feb 2014

Last edited Tue Feb 4, 2014, 01:15 PM - Edit history (1)

in this discussion is the Executive Order 9066 is that while the Japanese were impacted the most by this executive order (~110,000 were interned), Germans, Italians and some Jewish Refugees (approximately 15,000 total) were also impacted by this order.

I don't have any research material with me but the signing of this order was not 100% supported by FDR Administration. There was opposition within the FDR Administration.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
39. Sounds like a good reason to keep right-wing pigs off of the court.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 09:50 AM
Feb 2014

Too bad Ralph Nader didn't think of that when he helped extend this right-wing court by 30+ years.

former9thward

(31,987 posts)
45. Some posters blame Nader for every evil on the planet earth.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 10:49 AM
Feb 2014

Even things that occurred before he was alive.

James48

(4,435 posts)
44. Scalia should ask the full Court to repudiate the faulty cases.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 10:25 AM
Feb 2014

The Supreme Court has NEVER said it was sorry for accepting the lies and false testimony presented, and
it should do so now.

Read about the case for repudiation here:

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/files/case-for-repudiation-1.pdf

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
48. Muslim Americans would be the most likely victims of an internment policy as a reactions to a major
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 11:14 AM
Feb 2014

terrorist attack inside the U.S. - especially if WMD's were involved.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
62. YEAH!
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 02:34 PM
Feb 2014

Okay the RW is at war with our form of government led by cruztoy. Intern cruztoy, this 'supreme' and all the texans that voted for him. just joking!!!!! maybe.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
64. The mentioning of war
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 05:48 PM
Feb 2014

leaves me to ask: What would happen in case of a velvet revolution in this country?

Faygo Kid

(21,478 posts)
65. I got to meet and know Fred Korematsu
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 07:26 PM
Feb 2014

On a side note, I got to spend a couple of days including dinner with Fred Korematsu and his wife in 1996. Delightful couple, he met her at the end of the war in Detroit after he was released. He went on to a very successful career as an engineer. But make no mistake. His anger at the internment was still palpable, more a sense of injustice now than personal affront. Yet he remembered the little things, the small slights, the sounds and the smells of the camp. An unforgettable experience.

http://korematsuinstitute.org/institute/aboutfred/

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Antonin Scalia: 'You Are ...