Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Redfairen

(1,276 posts)
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 06:11 PM Feb 2014

Elizabeth Warren: We Need to Stop Packing the Courts With Corporate Judges

Source: Mother Jones

On Thursday morning, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) called on President Barack Obama to nominate more judges to the federal bench who have backgrounds serving the public interest instead of corporate America.

Of Obama's judicial nominations so far, just ten—fewer than four percent—have worked as lawyers at public interest organizations, according to a report released Thursday by the Alliance for Justice, a network of civil rights organizations. Only 10 nominees have had experience representing workers in labor disputes. Eighty-five percent have been either corporate attorneys or prosecutors. At an event Thursday sponsored by several civil rights organizations, including the Brennan Center for Justice and the Alliance for Justice, Warren called for more balance in the system.

"Power is becoming more and more concentrated on one side," she said. "Well-financed corporate interests line up to fight for their own privileges and resist any change that would limit corporate excess… We have an opportunity to…fight for something that balances the playing field in the other direction."

Warren noted that now is the perfect time to take up that fight. Obstruction by Senate Republicans has stalled the confirmation of many of the president's judicial nominees over the years. More federal judgeships remained vacant during Obama's first term than during President George W. Bush's, and there are still more than 50 vacancies on the federal bench that need to be filled. "So it's unsurprising that the president and a majority of the Senate gravitated to nominating corporate lawyers…that most conservative senators could not object to," Warren said. In November, however, the Senate voted to put an end to GOP obstruction by ending the filibuster for judicial nominations. Now it only takes a simple majority of the Senate to confirm nominees to the federal bench. Theoretically, that means that Obama can nominate progressive candidates with experience representing the average American, and Democrats will be able to confirm those nominees without any Republican votes.



Read more: http://m.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/02/elizabeth-warren-judicial-nominations-brennan-center

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
1. Alas. This speaks volumes about our president's basic world view:
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 06:27 PM
Feb 2014

>>>Of Obama's judicial nominations so far, just ten—fewer than four percent—have worked as lawyers at public interest organizations, according to a report released Thursday by the Alliance for Justice, a network of civil rights organizations. Only 10 nominees have had experience representing workers in labor disputes. Eighty-five percent have been either corporate attorneys or prosecutors.>>>>

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
2. This is the second time Warren has tried to put the blame on Pres Obama instead of the Senators...
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 06:56 PM
Feb 2014

... the Senators that give Obama the lists of names from which he picks the nominees from.

She needs to sit back and study the situation a bit more in depth before speaking publicly about the issue.

 

onwardsand upwards

(276 posts)
16. She's shining a light on an important issue.
Fri Feb 7, 2014, 06:41 AM
Feb 2014

More power to her!

And less power to the man that does not oppose all wars.

mtasselin

(666 posts)
3. yes
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 07:03 PM
Feb 2014

I love that woman, now we need more senators like her. The question remains will he do it or has he become that corrupted himself, I hope he remembers where he came from from.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
4. It's good we have Sen. Elizabeth Warren to speak up and call on President O :)
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 07:21 PM
Feb 2014

I'm soooo happy she beat that 'tomahawk chop' loser

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
6. is she TRYING to single-handedly restore our faith in the Democratic Party?
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:29 PM
Feb 2014

because if so, it's working.

Lasher

(27,558 posts)
9. She is simply stating the obvious.
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 10:06 PM
Feb 2014

But no other prominent Democrat is doing it, so that counts for something.

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
11. Funny thing about "faith" is it requires NO objective evidence. Glad everybody's "faith" in a just
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 10:41 PM
Feb 2014
system is restored by 1 little SPEECH
 

hollowdweller

(4,229 posts)
12. Slow Process
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 11:13 PM
Feb 2014

It's really going to be a slow process to turn the country back to where the little guy has a chance.

First thing is what she is doing just to make the public aware how rigged the system is against the little guy.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Elizabeth Warren: We Need...