Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,515 posts)
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 12:05 AM Feb 2014

Missouri bill to create ‘parental warning’ requirement to teach evolution debated

Source: Raw Story

Missouri bill to create ‘parental warning’ requirement to teach evolution debated
By George Chidi
Saturday, February 15, 2014 22:04 EST

Education in science will be opt-out in Missouri, if a bill requiring schools to notify parents if “the theory of evolution by natural selection” is being taught at their child’s school passes.

The bill proposed by Republican State Rep. Rick Brattin had its first public hearing Thursday. Brattin has described teaching only evolution in school as “indoctrination” to local TV.

The language of the bill makes little provision separating discussion of the specifics of evolutionary biology from any other element of biology upon which evolutionary theory rests, like anthropology, examination of dinosaur fossils, genetic sciences, disease or modern medicine.

“My fear is that every mention of a fossil, every conversation about the development of organs and vital structures, every single mention about the genetic similarity that we share with other organisms could potentially be systematically whittled out of these student’s education,” wrote Maxton Thoman, a student columnist for the University of Alabama’s Crimson White. “In the end, a lack of an education in this field will put students behind the rest of their class, and the rest of the world for that matter, in a way that they will not be able to recover from – much like leaving out multiplication would severely hinder any further advancement in mathematics.”

Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/02/15/missouri-bill-to-create-parental-warning-requirement-to-teach-evolution-debated/

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Missouri bill to create ‘parental warning’ requirement to teach evolution debated (Original Post) Judi Lynn Feb 2014 OP
Jesus! pangaia Feb 2014 #1
Actually, I think he voted against this.. Wounded Bear Feb 2014 #4
Evolution has the God botherers scared. Wonder why?!?! blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #2
because they get off on the ability to rape your mind with bullshit stg81 Feb 2014 #9
Ah yes! The Red States, soon to be known as the really stupid States! nt Walk away Feb 2014 #3
Here's how you know you believe in evolution. CSStrowbridge Feb 2014 #5
If this twit was created in God's image...... lastlib Feb 2014 #6
Opting out of "science"? SoapBox Feb 2014 #7
.... trusty elf Feb 2014 #13
Excellent! ctsnowman Feb 2014 #15
Did these people even think for a minute how this could possibly work? Jerry442 Feb 2014 #8
Almost all of the debate is narrowly focused. Igel Feb 2014 #19
Good luck with making sense of it all. Jerry442 Feb 2014 #24
Well at least one teacher in Brattin's exboyfil Feb 2014 #10
Check out the quote exboyfil Feb 2014 #11
Oh, christ on a stick... awoke_in_2003 Feb 2014 #17
Driver's Ed isn't in the Bible either (nt) neeksgeek Feb 2014 #21
The proposed law already duplicates an existing law in part exboyfil Feb 2014 #12
This is great!!!! I love it. AlbertCat Feb 2014 #14
It's an election year! bleedinglib Feb 2014 #16
shouldn't this be the other way around? EC Feb 2014 #18
If evolution is outlawed, then only outlaws will evolve. nt Deep13 Feb 2014 #20
My jaw has just hit the floor. LeftishBrit Feb 2014 #22
it really boils down to this... madrchsod Feb 2014 #23

CSStrowbridge

(267 posts)
5. Here's how you know you believe in evolution.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 01:12 AM
Feb 2014

Here's how you know you believe in evolution.

If you get sick, do you go to the doctor? If you do, then you believe in evolution.

lastlib

(23,208 posts)
6. If this twit was created in God's image......
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 01:13 AM
Feb 2014

...that would make God a paste-eating, mouth-breathing dumb-fuck..........

Jerry442

(1,265 posts)
8. Did these people even think for a minute how this could possibly work?
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 01:59 AM
Feb 2014

Last edited Sun Feb 16, 2014, 03:06 AM - Edit history (1)

Would there be a state-approved "minder" in every biology class, every chemistry class, every physics class, every history class, every astronomy class ready to jump in at any mention of anything that would undermine the concept of a 6,000-year-old universe?

Added on edit:

It just occurred to me that that the minders would have to be so comprehensively schooled on all the conflicts between science and Creationism that they'd be in constant danger of going over to the "dark side".



Igel

(35,296 posts)
19. Almost all of the debate is narrowly focused.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 03:41 PM
Feb 2014

Which is something I find interesting and fairly inexplicable.

They focus on biological evolution. Heck, in NC (SC?) the objection was to "natural selection"--you could teach biological evolution as the innovation of new traits and shift in the dominance of pre-existing traits, but you couldn't use the phrase "natural selection" because that evoked Darwinism.

The whole theory is fine, minus one mechanism embedded in it? Huh?

Same for here. You want to teach Big Bang and look at cosmic background microwave radation, go for it. You want to discuss possible causes for the condensation of the nebula that led to the planetary nebula that gave rise to the Solar System and mechanisms for Sol's ejection from that stellar nursery, hey. Want to mention Theia? Sure. Tethys Sea and the Wilson Cycle? Why not?

Just don't talk evolution.

It all looks so inconsistent, so arbitrary, so muddle-headed to me while those making the proposals are so insistent that they are clear and focused I can't help but wonder if I'm missing their point. Or perhaps I'm conflating several groups. Perhaps some are old-Earthers and some are young-Earthers. Or it's some group's last hurrah before going under. Hard to know.

Jerry442

(1,265 posts)
24. Good luck with making sense of it all.
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 11:03 AM
Feb 2014

There doesn't seem to be any coherent center to Creationism. The only point they all seem to agree on is "don't mess with our kids' faith by teaching them stuff".

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
10. Well at least one teacher in Brattin's
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 03:40 AM
Feb 2014

district is fighting the good fight (John Dyck). Evolution is listed first in his Honors Biology II syllabus as well as links offered to PBS's Evolution website. I don't know if he would want to answer questions, but someone should ask him about this piece of legislation.

Brattin represents a small community south of Kansas City

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/index.html
http://harrisonvilleschools.org/education/components/scrapbook/default.php?sectiondetailid=17803&


exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
11. Check out the quote
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 03:55 AM
Feb 2014

Brandon Eastwood, of Harrisonville, echoed that support, and went a step further.

"Evolution is not taught in the Bible so it shouldn't be taught in the class," he said. "Even if I had to spend some time in jail I wouldn't subject my kids to that nonsense."


http://www.kctv5.com/story/24664815/missouri-lawmaker-wants-to-make-evolution-teaching-optional

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
12. The proposed law already duplicates an existing law in part
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 04:23 AM
Feb 2014

Inspection by the public of instructional material, research and experimentation programs or projects.
170.231. The school board of each school district shall provide that all public school instructional material intended for use in connection with any public school classroom instruction, or any public school research or experimentation program or project, shall be available for inspection by any person. For the purpose of this section, "classroom instruction" shall mean any public school instruction involving teachers and students or peers and students; "research or experimentation program or project" shall mean any public school research or experimentation program or project designed to explore or develop new and unproven teaching methods and techniques.

It is already in the Missouri Constitution that parents can opt out of any instruction that feel violates their religious freedoms.

https://votesmart.org/elections/ballot-measure/1646/religious-freedom-in-public-places#.UwByZvldWSo
"that no student shall be compelled to perform or participate in academic assignments or educational presentations that violate his or her religious beliefs"

bleedinglib

(212 posts)
16. It's an election year!
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 12:50 PM
Feb 2014

The RW always manages too get lots of nonsense on the ballot so
their base will get mad and come out of their caves & vote.
In Missouri we have a Dem. governor & a Repubic Senate & Legislature.
At the present time they are trying too Impeach him for some silly ass reason?
He tried too apply the ACA & they over rode him.
Google the the J P Morgan vision for Europe.

EC

(12,287 posts)
18. shouldn't this be the other way around?
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 02:31 PM
Feb 2014

I guess I'm assuming there are more normal people that would like to have a chance of opting out of their kids learning creationists crap.

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
22. My jaw has just hit the floor.
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 03:58 AM
Feb 2014

What next; parents will have to give permission to have their children taught that 2 + 2 = 4?

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
23. it really boils down to this...
Mon Feb 17, 2014, 08:05 AM
Feb 2014

any student who opts out will never be able to go to a community college, state college, or university. of course they could go to a "bible college" and have a useless degree in the real world.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Missouri bill to create ‘...