Google Fiber chooses nine metro areas for possible expansion
Source: Arstechnica
Google Fiber is ready to expand, as Google has identified nine metro areas scattered around the country as possible sites of deployment, the company said.
"Weve invited 34 cities in nine metro areas across the US to work with us to explore what it would take to build a new fiber-optic network in their community," Google said in an announcement today. "Many of these cities asked for Google Fiber in 2010 and have since continued to try to bring better Internet access to their residents."
Google is "hitting the road" to meet with these cities, and "conducting detailed studies of factors that affect construction plans in each place, like topography (e.g. hills, flood zones), housing density, and the condition of local infrastructure."
Read more: http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/02/google-fiber-chooses-nine-metro-areas-for-possible-expansion/
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)CatholicEdHead
(9,740 posts)hopefully next time.
SomeGuyInEagan
(1,515 posts)We could use some alternatives in the Twin Cities.
Seedersandleechers
(3,044 posts)and have google fiber. My choices were TWC, AT&T, and now GF. Competition is good however for high speed internet it's $70 a month. Luckily I don't own a TV and therefore do not need cable, and, I have a roommate to split the cost with.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)didn't think we stood a chance.
Boy I hope they come here
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)2 years away from service tho
quakerboy
(13,917 posts)Having an alternative to Cable or DSL would be amazing
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)Interesting.
mrmpa
(4,033 posts)Also the upper Midwest was ignored.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)The first two chosen in my state (Texas) combine to less than the total population of Houston, or DFW.
So, maybe that's the reason. Small cities first.
former9thward
(31,949 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)On first glance at that map, I only saw cities smaller than the classification of "major." Feel free to compare populations of all cities on their map and re-inform me if you feel so inclined.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Cities like SF would make them bury all the lines..I suspect In other cities they can run this from poles.
silenttigersong
(957 posts)I recently read or watched a doc,not sure ,but I think Google was an example of offshore- tax loopholes...anyone know 4 sure?Honestly ,if so isn't this a serious issue,to some DU'ers?
NBachers
(17,083 posts)silenttigersong
(957 posts)Been thinking about my consumer choices,and just wanted to know about Google's off shore banking practices..,I just recalled it was Facebook cited in a financial documentary about offshore banking.Sorry, if I do not communicate very well.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Heywood J
(2,515 posts)I realize some people don't have an alternative, but it's still hard to overlook the other issues with that company.
quakerboy
(13,917 posts)Comcast, verizon, etc who many of us are stuck with now?
Its pretty challenging to find an IPS that doesnt have some serious issues. And I would guess that if you did, they are small and buying their bandwidth from a larger ISP who does have issues in the privacy realm. And if not there, then in the net neutrality realm.
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)We can sure use some competition here.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)----can anybody put it in layperson terms?
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)a couple minutes. It's the kind of bandwidth that used to power a medium sized business now it's available in some homes.
It's not coupled with a tv package.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)I guess it could be argued that homes don't need that kind of bandwidth? Wonder why there aren't options.
I saw that it could be coupled with TV package?
quakerboy
(13,917 posts)you pay 300 bucks to get the line installed, but then get free internet for a minimum of 7 years, at a speed comparable to a cheap Comcast package.
That breaks down to about 3.50 a month. Comcast's absolute best, 6 month special price is 19.99 (+10 if you dont buy their TV service) per month, then it jumps to 40-70 a month after your deal is over, and more if they can sneak things past you on the bill. Even if you only consider the first year, it would break down to $25 a month, a significant cost reduction for most people.
wtf
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)marions ghost
(19,841 posts)OK I see...seems to be a reasonable deal. Any downside, or is this a huge improvement and a good way to go? I like to be sure before I support things I don't know much about.
quakerboy
(13,917 posts)in the isp market is a good thing. Dialup is pretty well dead. Cable companies are usually scam masters. DSL is rarely better. And most places youve only got one of each to chose from. The cell phone companies are starting to get in on things, but its pretty limited so far.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)---do not trust AT ALL. Predatory.
geomon666
(7,512 posts)tkmorris
(11,138 posts)I got all excited and everything. Atlanta? Pffftttt.
Lost_Count
(555 posts)... or does it just stay in city limits?