Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,006 posts)
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 08:51 PM Feb 2014

Portland [Ore.] not interested in hosting 2016 Democratic National Convention

Source: The Oregonian

Some 80,000 people packed into the Denver Broncos' football stadium in 2008 to hear Barack Obama accept the Democratic party's nomination for president.

Sorry Portland: you won't get a similar opportunity in 2016, when the Democrats next pick a presidential candidate.

Portland was among about three dozen cities asked whether it was interested in hosting the convention in two years, according to a report Tuesday on CNN.com.

"The city did get asked," Dana Haynes, a spokesman for Mayor Charlie Hales, confirmed in an email. "We declined to host the convention."

Read more: http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2014/02/portland_not_interested_in_hos.html

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Portland [Ore.] not interested in hosting 2016 Democratic National Convention (Original Post) alp227 Feb 2014 OP
Do they even have the facilities to do that? frazzled Feb 2014 #1
Good. Why blow up the budget on unnecessary overtime musiclawyer Feb 2014 #2
Good Gray Portland wouldn't be a good choice anyway. kimbutgar Feb 2014 #3
Have you been there in the summer? It's beautiful. JDPriestly Feb 2014 #9
I don't see thousands of anarchists swarming on the convention center itsrobert Feb 2014 #4
I suspect Portland didn't want to get overrun with centrists. That's possibly worse. nt pragmatic_dem Feb 2014 #8
they would privatize the scenery and the next thing you know, the mountains have logos yurbud Feb 2014 #15
you are right about that -nt pragmatic_dem Feb 2014 #18
everywhere is LESS than a few hours away from right wing racists yurbud Feb 2014 #14
Good. n/t bitchkitty Feb 2014 #5
I think Portland wouldn't be one of the best places to host davidpdx Feb 2014 #6
They'd be too busy drinking the local beer Wolf Frankula Feb 2014 #7
Too many liberals in Portland. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2014 #10
hold it in San Francisco! mackerel Feb 2014 #11
It's being floated here in Austin. nt Javaman Feb 2014 #12
I'm from Portland and it's designed to cater to the super-rich and their habits yurbud Feb 2014 #13
They're trying hard to get a young, liberal city 1000words Feb 2014 #16
A short list of more suitable locations for this particular conclave . . . . hatrack Feb 2014 #17
How about Salem, OR? Quantess Feb 2014 #19

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
1. Do they even have the facilities to do that?
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 09:11 PM
Feb 2014

It doesn't seem to me that there are enough hotels, etc. ... Maybe if you add in suburban facilities, I don't know.

musiclawyer

(2,335 posts)
2. Good. Why blow up the budget on unnecessary overtime
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 09:13 PM
Feb 2014

Economic impact of conventions is overrated and tends not to outweigh public costs of hosting

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
4. I don't see thousands of anarchists swarming on the convention center
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 09:45 PM
Feb 2014

good for the Hillary campaign. Not to mention Portland is only few hours away from 'survivalist' camps (racist) in the Washington, Oregon, and Idaho.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
15. they would privatize the scenery and the next thing you know, the mountains have logos
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 01:38 PM
Feb 2014

on them at night.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
14. everywhere is LESS than a few hours away from right wing racists
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 01:37 PM
Feb 2014

In most places, you just have to go to the burbs and you've got people are skinheads in their heart.

Wolf Frankula

(3,598 posts)
7. They'd be too busy drinking the local beer
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 11:24 PM
Feb 2014

to get any business done.

"Madame Chairman, Move this Convention recess for a pint!."

"Is there a sufficient second?"

"SECOND!"

"All in favor"

"AYE!!"

"Opposed?"

Sound of crickets.

"Off to a pub."

Wolf

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
13. I'm from Portland and it's designed to cater to the super-rich and their habits
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 01:35 PM
Feb 2014

as would be required by the behind the scenes players and a lot of the politicians.

Ostentatious wealth is out of place there.

And we probably don't have enough hookers and drug dealers to take care of either party.

hatrack

(59,578 posts)
17. A short list of more suitable locations for this particular conclave . . . .
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 02:43 PM
Feb 2014

Waco
Lubbock
Yuma
Provo
Wichita
Tulsa
Louisville
Fresno
Bakersfield
Spokane
Pierre
Pascagoula
Pensacola

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Portland [Ore.] not inter...