Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 06:17 PM Feb 2014

YouTube ordered to pull anti-Muslim film

Source: San Francisco Chronicle

A federal appeals court ordered an anti-Islamic film removed from YouTube on Wednesday and reinstated a copyright suit by an actress whose voice was dubbed over with an insult against the prophet Muhammad, leading to death threats against the actress and violence in the Middle East.

Although Cindy Garcia had only a brief role in the film, she has a right to control the use of her performance and to protect herself from fraud and physical harm, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said in a 2-1 ruling. The dissenting judge said that Garcia's minimal performance was not entitled to copyright protection, and that the court's takedown order may violate freedom of speech.

Garcia, of Los Angeles, was hired in 2011 for a minor part in a film called "Desert Warrior" and was paid $500. Instead, her scene appeared in "Innocence of Muslims," a 14-minute video shown on YouTube in 2012 by the same filmmaker, Mark Basseley Youssef. Her performance was partially dubbed over to include the line, "Is your Muhammad a child molester?"

... "The film differs so radically from anything Garcia could have imagined when she was cast that it can't possibly be authorized by any implied license she granted Youssef," said Chief Judge Alex Kozinski in the majority opinion.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/movies/article/YouTube-ordered-to-pull-anti-Muslim-film-5270456.php

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
YouTube ordered to pull anti-Muslim film (Original Post) Newsjock Feb 2014 OP
That's the one which caused the problems in Egypt dipsydoodle Feb 2014 #1
Wasn't that decided by the Borat film cases? Dr. Strange Feb 2014 #2
There may in fact be a difference dipsydoodle Feb 2014 #3
That's true Xyzse Feb 2014 #10
Good gopiscrap Feb 2014 #4
Oh, good. Now all that terrorism and hatred of the US will end. Pterodactyl Feb 2014 #5
Good. Sam B whatever the director's name is, alp227 Feb 2014 #6
K&R DeSwiss Feb 2014 #7
Here is the actual Court Opinion. happyslug Feb 2014 #8
Kick (nt) muriel_volestrangler Feb 2014 #9
I've never seen persuasive evidence the movie actually exists Recursion Feb 2014 #11

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
1. That's the one which caused the problems in Egypt
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 06:38 PM
Feb 2014

and also led to lame claims it caused the problem in Benghazi.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
10. That's true
Thu Feb 27, 2014, 01:21 PM
Feb 2014

Many of the actors/actresses that were in the "Innocence of" did not know what they were filming.

I would have to side with them, especially if they were not paid.

alp227

(32,006 posts)
6. Good. Sam B whatever the director's name is,
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 11:22 PM
Feb 2014

Last edited Thu Feb 27, 2014, 12:37 AM - Edit history (1)

Lied to the actress. Violated contract with her. Right call by the court, regardless how much this video influenced Benghazi. Free Republic must be sending a COVER UP by the court here...cognitive dissonance after insisting this video had nothing to do with the 9/11/12 events.

I wonder if the vocalists who sang on the first Milli Vanilli album could have gotten the album banned on similar grounds?

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
7. K&R
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 11:41 PM
Feb 2014
''The dissenting judge said that Garcia's minimal performance was not entitled to copyright protection, and that the court's takedown order may violate freedom of speech.''


- A ''minimal performance'' is when someone pulls something like this minority dissenting opinion from their ass......

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
11. I've never seen persuasive evidence the movie actually exists
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:08 AM
Feb 2014

The Hollywood Reporter covered it pretty well two years ago:

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/innocence-of-muslims-movie-youtube-trailer-371465

Innocence of Muslims is perhaps the most famous movie in the world, but no one seems to have seen it. Maybe that's because it doesn't exist beyond the muddled 14-minute "trailer" on YouTube that has prompted anti-American violence in the Middle East.

The film's writer, Sam Bacile, aka Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, initially said he created a full-length movie that screened at the Vine Theatre in Hollywood under the title The Innocence of Bin Laden. But a theater employee told the Los Angeles Times no one attended the screening, nor did the employee watch the movie.

And a YouTube video called "Innocence of Muslims 74 Min" is merely the same 14 minutes looped over and over. One of the actors, Cindy Lee Garcia, tells THR that Nakoula boasted he was making a two-hour action epic, though Garcia has seen nothing beyond the infamous 14 minutes. "The movie doesn't exist," says Marium Mohiuddin of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, which advises Hollywood producers on how to portray Muslims accurately. "We've been looking hard for a full movie, and we haven't found anything."

But whether it's real doesn't seem to matter to the rioting radicals because not only are they convinced there is such a movie, "there's a complete misconception that this is a major Hollywood project and not a poorly thrown-together video," adds Mohiuddin.


That is, there's certainly a trailer on Youtube, but it's not actually a trailer for a movie that was ever produced, and it doesn't seem like the cast and crew were shooting a movie about Islam.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»YouTube ordered to pull a...