Sen. Corker: Congress To Consider Targeted Sanctions On Russia
Source: TPM
DANIEL STRAUSS MARCH 1, 2014, 1:46 PM EST
Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN), the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations committee, said Congress will consider applying targeted sanctions against Russian persons and entities" in response to the country's decision to invade Crimean Ukraine.
On Saturday, Russia's upper chamber approved President Vladimir Putin's request to send military troops to parts of Ukraine.
"Vladimir Putin is seizing a neighboring territory - again - so President Obama must lead a meaningful, unified response with our European allies to bring an immediate halt to these provocative Russian actions, which threaten international peace and security. The Russian government has felt free to intervene militarily in Ukraine because the United States, along with Europe, has failed to make clear there would be serious, potentially irreparable consequences to such action," Corker said in a statement.
"The United States and our European allies should immediately bring to bear all elements of our collective economic strength to stop Russian advances in Ukraine," Corker added. "Congress will consider targeted sanctions against Russian persons and entities that undermine the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine."
###
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/bob-corker-targeted-sanctions-russia
Initech
(100,063 posts)cprise
(8,445 posts)DemocracyNow aired a leaked phone conversation with US diplomats plotting the coup in Ukraine.
Its clear that with the economy "recovery" faltering, the Obama admin is prepared to use a large-scale war (or imminent threat of it) as a war-economy stimulus.
This incident could undo everything he claimed to accomplish or ever claimed to be.
elleng
(130,864 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)http://dncdn.dvlabs.com/ipod/dn2014-0220.mp4
...Now what are the Russians saying about Ukraine? Theyre saying what you just said, that the peaceful protesters, as we keep calling themI think a lot of them have gone home. There were many. By the way, at the beginning, there were hundreds of thousands, tens of thousands, of very decent, liberal, progressive, honorable people in the streets. But theyve lost control of the situation. Thats the point now. And so, the Russians are saying, "Look, youre trying to depose Yanukovych, whos the elected government." Think. If you overthrowand, by the way, theres a presidential election in a year. The Russians are saying wait 'til the next election. If you overthrow himand that's what Washington and Brussels are saying, that he must gowhat are you doing to the possibility of democracy not only in Ukraine, but throughout this part of the world? And secondly, who do you think is going to come to power? Please tell us. And were silent.
AMY GOODMAN: I want to go to the famous leaked tape right now. The top State Department official has apologized to her European counterparts after she was caught cursing the European Union, the EU, in a leaked audio recording that was posted to YouTube. The recording captured an intercepted phone conversation between the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt, and Victoria Nuland, the top U.S. diplomat for Europe. Nuland expresses frustration over Europes response to the political crisis in Ukraine, using frank terms.
AMY GOODMAN: While Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nulands comment about the EU dominated the news headlines because she used a curse, there were several other very interesting parts of her conversation with the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine.
VICTORIA NULAND: So, on that piece, Geoff, when I wrote the note, Sullivans come back to me VFR saying, "You need Biden?" And I said, "Probably tomorrow for an attaboy and to get the deets to stick." So Bidens willing.
AMY GOODMAN: Thats the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Pyatt, speaking with Victoria Nuland. The significance of what she is saying? She also had gone to Ukraine and was feeding protesters on the front line.
STEPHEN COHEN: Cookies, cookies. Well, here again, the American political media establishment, including the right and the left and the centerbecause theyre all complicit in this nonsensefocused on the too sensational, they thought, aspect of that leaked conversation. She said, "F the European Union," and everybody said, "Oh, my god! She said the word." The other thing was, who leaked it? "Oh, it was the Russians. Those dirty Russians leaked this conversation." But the significance is what you just played. What are they doing? The highest-ranking State Department official, who presumably represents the Obama administration, and the American ambassador in Kiev are, to put it in blunt terms, plotting a coup détat against the elected president of Ukraine.
Now, that said, Amy, Juan, you may say to meneither of you would, but hypothetically"Thats a good thing. We dont likewe dont care if he was elected democratically. Hes a rat. Hes corrupt." And he is all those things. He is. "Lets depose him. Thats what the United States should do. Then the United States should stand up and say, Thats what we do: We get rid of bad guys. We assassinate them, and we overthrow them." But in Washington and in Brussels, they lie: Theyre talking about democracy now. Theyre not talking about democracy now; theyre talking about a coup now...
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)too cryptic for me
Interesting, we heard about the 'leaked' conversation, as Cohen stated, due to the F word, shortly after it occurred. The context provided by the DemocracyNow discussion adds a huge amount to our ability to understand what's been happening over there.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)How about a link to an article about the faltering economy?
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)Thats some pretty impressive tradecraft, said Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland of the interception and leak of her now-infamous call to US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoff Pyatt. (The call consisted of the two plotting to install a US puppet government in Ukraine after overthrowing the current, democratically elected government.) Tradecraft means spycraft. In other words, Nuland was crediting a foreign intelligence service with impressive use of technology to be able to hack into her call to the ambassador. Everyone knew she was talking about Russia, partly because the Administration had been blaming Russia from the moment the recording was made public. However, Nuland knew all along that this was not the case, and she did nothing while the Administration continued to escalate the accusations against Russia.
Jay Carney, White House Spokesman, It says something about Russia, that they would tap the telephone call. State Department Spokeswoman Jan Psaki was even harsher, calling it a new low in Russian tradecraft. But the telephone call between the two, we learned yesterday, was not conducted on a secure, encrypted telephone line that the State Department requires for such sensitive conversations and communication. Rather, the call was made over unsecured cell phones and thus easily intercepted with basic equipment that is widely available to anyone. Therefore it was not impressive tradecraft at all that led to the capture and release of the conversation.
Nuland and Pyatt obviously knew that at the time, being the two parties to the call. They then either sat by and allowed US government official(s) one after the other accuse Russia of going to great lengths to hack the call without admitting this fact, (n)or they did inform their superiors, but Administration officials decided to ignore this critical fact and push accusations against Russia anyway. You never want a serious crisis to go to waste, as it is said.
RPI contacted a former State Department official to clarify security procedures for such a telephone conversation between high-level personnel. The official was clear:
So this was a serious security violation.
The former official continued:
Indeed, the fallout from Ukraine-gate is astounding but sadly not surprising. The mainstream media in the US has focused solely on the Russian angle (now discredited) and on the salty language and particularly the false supposition that Nuland was using sailors language to indicate a serious rift with the EU on Ukraine policy. In fact, US and EU policy toward Ukraine is identical: regime change. The dispute is merely over velocity and is therefore cosmetic rather than substantive: should we travel 100 miles per hour or only 75 miles per hour toward regime change?
As far as we have seen, there has been virtually no discussion of the substance of the telephone conversation in the US media. But the conversation was a confirmation of all theretofore denied accusations of US involvement in the current unrest in Ukraine. It was not simply US well-wishing toward the opposition parties. It was not simply a bit of advice and a wink toward the opposition. It was wholesale planning and brokering a post-regime change governing coalition in Ukraine, with the UN being ordered to come in and glue the deal.
More precisely, as the Oriental Journal points out:
They agreed to nominate Batkyvshchina Party leader Arseniy Yatseniuk as Deputy Prime Minister, to bench Udar Party leader Vitaly Klitschko from the game for a while and to discredit neo-Nazi Svoboda partychief Oleh Tiahnybok as Yanukovychs project...
SO, WHO IS THE CURRENT INTERIM PRIME MINISTER IN UKRAINE?
Ukraine crisis: the nightmare in-tray of new prime minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10666373/Ukraine-crisis-the-nightmare-in-tray-of-new-prime-minister-Arseniy-Yatsenyuk.html
HOW CONVENIENT! AND HIS FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS? SQUEEZE EVERY LAST NICKEL, OR EQUIVALENT, OUT OF UKRAINIANS TO PAY OFF THE EU AND IMF LOANS....
...Is the US training and funding the Ukraine opposition? Nuland herself claimed in December that the US had spent $5 billion since the 1990s on democratization programs in Ukraine. On what would she like us to believe the money had been spent? We know that the US State Department invests heavily more than $100 million from 2008-2012 alone on international Internet freedom activities. This includes heavy State Department funding, for example, to the New Americas Foundations
Commotion Project. What an appropriate name for what is happening in Ukraine.
THERE'S MORE, AND IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON, YOU CAN CLICK ON THE LINK
elleng
(130,864 posts)cprise
(8,445 posts)Its amazing how the lack of scepticism creeps back every time our military-industrial complex wants to build a new outpost.
Its either that (which would be stupidity) or this place is crawling with astroturfers.
elleng
(130,864 posts)cprise
(8,445 posts)I think I was the one who first mentioned the DN broadcast in this thread.
People are in deep denial about the establishment's willingness to start a conflict with Russia in order to maintain a perception of being indispensable at home.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)And enjoy Segami's thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4582939
cprise
(8,445 posts)He may not have planned such a war, but he's probably got one now.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)The only war that is going to matter soon is climate change and providing for billions of people worldwide. The battle will be inside nations for how to make a sustainable world.
Not between them, except in those created by empires that are gathering mothballs. The human race got their fill of wars from Iraq. It was the most monumental bloodbath in this century, other than the places in Africa where they are killing each other for religion sold by grifters and smothered in oil.
Of which, Obama's moves for energy independence and alternative energy is designed to keep us removed. The Chinese and Russians and a few other nations are playing those games, along with global corporations who know we are going to get away from them soon enough. They are kicking and squealing, but no one is buying it anymore.
All the technology used for war can be turned to more peaceful means, and that is going to happen. Fuck the warmongers like Corker and the rest trying to interfere. The future is moving rapidly out of their hands.
Now to shut down their always bloody hands in 2014.
cprise
(8,445 posts)Your prattle about Africa and Iraq might have sounded convincing 6 months ago, but now it just sounds deranged.
Don't you think they know that progressives were planning to clean House this year?? Might not happen now with Putin doing all that scary mobilizing of war machines. I think TPTB miscalculated, thinking Russia would only *sound* threatening, but the result for the near-term is we may have hawkish conservatives around for longer than we planned.
That is not clear. In fact that statement is ridiculous.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Obama is taking the heat now from rightwingers calling him weak for not taking military action or sanctions.
But they won't fund jobs and healthcare for veterans, having defeated Sanders' bill for that, trying to sanction Iran.
Now Corker wants to sanction Russia. Or whoever they make villain du jour, to push profits for the Koches from Keystone and their pals in the MIC.
Obama knows we can't afford to fall prey to this game again.
cprise
(8,445 posts)or he's lost control of the people supposedly taking orders from him.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)The Reagan thing has been debunked as having been taken out of context. I've watched the video of the entire speech. He said he'd be seen that way, but he was in no way going to carry out Reagan policies. Then went into his agenda.
cprise
(8,445 posts)bkanderson76
(266 posts)elleng
(130,864 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)You betcha!
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)In a recession? aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahaha
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)Will be another Afghanistan for them.
Bill76
(39 posts)question everything
(47,468 posts)How about returning NASA the funds that the Republicans cut, so that we are not dependent on them, before all these chickenhawks start quaking?
Botany
(70,489 posts)US Sec. Of State Kerry Against Inflaming Ukraine Situation
US Secretary of State John Kerry Friday urged all players in Ukraines
current crisis not to inflame an already tense situation in the country.
snip
While we were told that they are not engaging in any violation of the
sovereignty and do not intend to, I nevertheless made it clear that that
could be misinterpreted at this moment, Mr. Kerry told reporters along
with visiting Colombian Foreign Minister Maria Holguin at the State
Department. And that there are enough tensions that it is important for
everybody to be extremely careful not to inflame the situation and not to
send the wrong messages.
http://www.livetradingnews.com/us-sec-of-state-kerry-against-inflaming-ukraine-situation-33737.htm#.UxJk_BxUOmR
freshwest
(53,661 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)rpannier
(24,329 posts)make up fake images to bolster their case and then add
"I'm sure Sen Corker and the other Republicans understand the importance of this." and then move on
sawdust
(199 posts)In 2009 I worked out of the springhill tn gm plant and as our President was trying to get the auto industry up asshole corker was one of the loudest against the auto bailout needless to say the plant was idled. A cpl of years later the plant came back to life as an engine production facility at the reopening several gm big wigs and dignataries were there and guess who showed up to take credit...you guessed it shithead corker. He tried to say a few words but was booed off stage by uaw workers who were chanting go home corker. Another GOP SLIME BAG!
Samantha
(9,314 posts)Let them go bankrupt. I was appalled. I know when bankruptcies are filed, workers who are near retirement or accrued pensions become just another creditor. I tried to imagine a worker in Detroit having maybe 28, 29 years in and hearing Corker say those words. I have despised the man since that time.
He doesn't represent the little guy, the poor person in Tennessee. He works for the big business interests. I would give anything to see him lose his next election and join the ranks of the unemployed.
Sam
freshwest
(53,661 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)corker can saying anything he wants but no one is taking him serous.