VW workers file suit to block 'further collusion' between UAW, automaker
Source: Detroit News
Workers at Volkswagen AG's plant in Chattanooga have filed a federal lawsuit in an attempt to block "further collusion" between the United Auto Workers and the German automaker.
The workers, who are represented by the National Right to Work Foundation, called it a preemptive move aimed at preventing cooperation between the company and the union in the event that the National Labor Relations Board sets aside last month's election at the plant and allows another vote.
.......
"UAW union officials and Volkswagen management have colluded to deprive these workers of a fair vote from the start," said Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Foundation said in a statement after the suit was filed Thursday morning. "Enough is enough, which is why these workers are seeking to prevent further VW assistance to the UAW's organizing efforts."
UAW President Bob King called said the lawsuit was another example of what he has characterized as "outside interference" in the union's effort to organize the plant.
Read more: http://m.detnews.com/topstories/article?a=2014303130083&f=1207
EC
(12,287 posts)were paid to do this? I don't think they can do this. It's more interference. They really are going to make VW think twice about expanding down there, much less keeping that plant going. Why would they (VW) even want to continue down there if they can't do business in the way that is best for them?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Evidently you feel some contempt for these workers.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)It was apparent from your phraseology.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Humm.
pasto76
(1,589 posts)Im second generation union ironworker. Im an organizer in my local. Im a democrat.
Trying to get these guys to understand just the BASICS is like pulling teeth. Getting them to actually vote in their interests, near impossible.
most of the guys in my local have completely bought into the conservative bullshit. two years ago I said 'romney has stated that his first day in office he would try and eliminate Project labor agreements on federal jobs'....as we were working on a PLA job.
90% of the ones who voted, voted for romney.
People are stupid. If these clowns at the VW plant are really doing this, reap what you sow.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Get them off politically loaded subjects that have been subject to massive indoctrination and you don't see anything like the same level of sheer idiocy.
I have arguments nearly daily with people much similar to the ones you're talking about, like many here on DU they have "picked a team" and supporting the team is what they do.
Look around right here on DU and you see long term posters arguing some seriously stupid stuff, a substantial fraction of what goes on in GD is mocking other posters for being divorced from reality.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024658422
jmowreader
(50,528 posts)I don't think VW will ever put another plant in the American South but there's no question they'll keep this one going, if only because VW didn't become the world's third-largest automaker by throwing billion-dollar investments away.
I would LOVE to see VW come out with a statement next time they decide to build a US factory, if such a day ever arrives: "The US is an attractive place to build a manufacturing facility, with ready access to a huge market and hardworking, skilled people. However, since many American politicians have shown they are opposed to some of our business practices, such as partnering with trade unions, we have decided to build our next US factory in the city of Detroit, historical center of the American auto industry."
Lasher
(27,537 posts)UncleYoder
(233 posts)fingerprints all over this one.
How dare a company even attempt to work with an union to improve their business.
sgtbenobo
(327 posts)You win a cigar!
//Snip//
Mark Mix, President of the National Right To Work Committee and President of the National Right To Work Legal Defense Fund
Was a presenter at a Koch Conference in Aspen, Colorado, where he discussed coordinated electoral strategies. His organization, National Right to Work, receives free summer employees from the Koch summer fellows program.
Mix attended the 2010 Koch Conference in Aspen, Colorado.
Mix presented a session entitled Mobilizing Citizens for November, on the topic: Is there a chance this fall to elect leaders who are strongly committed to liberty and prosperity? alongside Sean Noble and Tim Phillips of the Koch Funded Americans for Prosperity.
Mix is a Speaker for the Leadership Institute, an organization that received over $100,000 from Koch-funded foundations.
//Snip//
http://www.pfaw.org/media-center/publications/anatomy-koch-thon-sham-budget-hearings-brought-you-koch-brothers
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Andrea Mitchell was there.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)And "represented" by the National Right to Work Foundation? Don't make me laugh.
Lasher
(27,537 posts)Even when the employer actually wants union representation for their employees, the state government and its cronies illegally intimidate workers into voting against it.
jamzrockz
(1,333 posts)situations where unions are not needed, where the employees feel safe and satisfied with treatment from their employers. In those rare cases, employee will resist unionization.
This is another example. People should know when they are not wanted.
alp227
(32,006 posts)I'd prefer not to give them any more traffic. what's the point of that video?
jamzrockz
(1,333 posts)But the video tells the story of this one farm that actually seems to treat their employers well, pays them I think 80c above the average for farm workers in California. The story of the employees attempt to tell the Farmers Union that they did not need their representation.
Its a rare occurrence but when there is actually and employer who does a good job with their employees, I think its bad form for union leaders to try and unionize the workers.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Do you like weekends? Thank a union.
ctsnowman
(1,903 posts)Frivolous lawsuits come to mind. GOP talking point that they only use when it supports their beliefs.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)They can also have their pay lowered and forced to work longer hours.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)well then they shouldn't have voted against doing that a couple of weeks ago.
bkanderson76
(266 posts)...except maybe a couple come to mind....or three....FRICKEN BACKWOOD IDIOTS...(mildly)
geardaddy
(24,926 posts)Koch Bros-fronted PAC, then they don't deserve a union. VW needs to put that plant somewhere where the UAW will welcomed with open arms.
Roy Rolling
(6,908 posts)The Koch Bros astroturf PACs rely on the modern-day version of "keep 'em barefoot and pregnant". Workers don't want to be across the table against a company's army of lawyers, that is why they need union representation.
But the point is valid, move out of areas where right-wing politicians dictate labor policy to benefit their Koch Bros comrades and sell their constituents down the river.
geardaddy
(24,926 posts)mike_c
(36,269 posts)The UAW and Volkswagon AGREE on organizing to improve working conditions for workers and these chuckleheads are suing to PREVENT it? Why not demand a mandatory daily poke in the eye while they're at it? And a pay cut? Sheesh.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)They are terrified of making any changes which might endanger that income and they have been fed a steady diet of propaganda since the cradle.
A relative of mine has a choice between working a high paid union job and being self employed for considerably less money. Most of the time he chooses self employment because he can't stand the union job pace at his age (12 hours x 7 days until job is done) and finds the politics involved with the union position distasteful.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)I really have a hard time having any sympathy for many of today's workers. They seem ready to stab their fellow workers in the back to gain favor with their masters. They have bought the corporate propaganda that the unions are their enemy and the corporations are their protectors. Then they bemoan the fact that their jobs have been outsourced and their pensions and health have gone south.
With the assistance of the MSM, it appears that the Democrats will be fighting a growing conviction that the AFCA is the ruination of the union. Coupled with their unsupported attack on health care the Republican Party has launched an all out attack on the poor working class as lazy, good for nothing parasites. Their racist attack of the Blacks and Latinos has been totally ignored by the worthless MSM kiss-asses.
I really don't know what kind of a future young people can look forward to. I am one of the fortunate people who lived during the greatest era a Middle Class empowerment that has ever existed in our nation. Only a minority will have a pension in the future and after the Republicans destroy Social Security and Medicare they can look forward to their senior years dumpster diving for survival. I am glad that I won't be around to see it, but I sure as hell feel for my grandkids and all those who will suffer.
bobthedrummer
(26,083 posts)Wrong for Everyone
http://www.wrongforeveryone.com/behind-right-to-wor
K&R
Death to tyrants.
nykym
(3,063 posts)close the plant and when asked why, We find the quality of life and working conditions in the state of Tennessee to be an inhospitable work environment.
Then relocate in a state that supports unions.
And don't tell me about all those lost jobs - those workers chose to support anti-labor practices and Right to Work nut jobs.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)What a crock. probably underwritten by the Kochs.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)WhiteTara
(29,692 posts)their company out of there? I mean, it is a right to work state and they can be fired for no reason.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)I guess you can't fix stupid.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)NOPE in the south they are virulently anti-union....they don't even know why. In fact I have argued that there is no Teachers Union in SC...they seemed to believe there was...and they wantted to blame the ills of their failing education system on the non-existent Union there. Because there is a teachers "association" they think that constitutes a Union. I even had State employees tell me they have never benefitted from Unions!! LMAO!!!
d_r
(6,907 posts)Don't have some way to stand up to their employer. If there was only some way they could get together and speak with a common voice.
xynthee
(477 posts)This boggles the mind!
mac56
(17,564 posts)National Right To Starve Foundation
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Filing a lawsuit against collusion between the corporatists and the elected officials. I believe it's called bribery.
These astroturf ad-hoc groups have got to go. They have to be outed for the corporate thugs that they are!
LittleGirl
(8,279 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)CANDO
(2,068 posts)For ever and a day conservatives have argued against unions because they say they are an "outside influence"....well then just what the hell would you call the "National Right To Work Foundation"? In the reality based world, this foundation would qualify as an outside influence.
TeamPooka
(24,207 posts)One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)Don't see where NRTW can claim to represent more than "a" employee or "a certain group" of employees. Seems to me that NRTW is representing itself as the voice of the workers which is essentially their "union". And to do that there should be a vote deciding that the group representing the works shall be NRTW or UAW or another. Now if NRTW wants to be the union that never has contracts and cedes everything to the employer and that's who some vote to represent them. Well it's a free country. Otherwise they speak for themselves and not the "workers".
Turbineguy
(37,291 posts)LOWER THE MINUMUM WAGE!
Omaha Steve
(99,494 posts)http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324296604578179603136860138
By Neil Shah and Ben Casselman
Dec. 14, 2012 6:51 p.m. ET
By adopting a "right-to-work" law this week, Michigan is joining a group of states where wages tend to be lower, but job growth stronger, than states that don't have the law.
But gauging how much of this divergence in paychecks and employment is a result of the laws is difficult to do.
Employees on the assembly line at Ford Motor Co.'s Dearborn Truck Plant in Dearborn, Mich. The state enacted a right-to-work law this past week. Bloomberg News
Right-to-work laws, which allow workers in unionized workplaces to opt out of paying union dues, were first adopted in the South decades ago as part of a larger drive to lure factory jobs from the heavily unionized North. By that measure, those early lawsin conjunction with other business-friendly policieswere highly successful.
Now, the trend is spreading to the heart of the old Rust Belt itself, in the wake of Republican gains in the region in the 2010 elections. Earlier this year, Indiana passed such a law, and on Tuesday, the birthplace of the United Auto Workers union, Michigan, became the 24th state to adopt such a measure.
FULL story at link.
Sanity Claws
(21,840 posts)Auto workers don't have the money to finance a case.
Also, what is their standing to bring suit?
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)here are the takers the republicans are always bemaoning