Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 12:19 PM Apr 2014

Former deputy CIA director defends editing Benghazi talking points

Source: Guardian

The former deputy director of the CIA insisted on Wednesday that he didn't edit the widely debunked talking points on the 2012 Benghazi attack due to political pressure to protect President Barack Obama and onetime secretary of state Hillary Clinton.

In a rare open session, Mike Morell offered a lengthy defense of his actions and the work of the spy agency in the politically charged aftermath of the 11 September 2012 assault on the diplomatic mission in Libya. Four Americans, including US ambassador Chris Stevens, were killed in two separate terror attacks over a chaotic period of several hours.

Morell deleted references to al-Qaida in versions of the talking points that were used by Susan Rice, then US ambassador to the United Nations, in a series of Sunday talk show appearances. Republicans have accused the Obama administration of trying to mislead the American people about an act of terrorism in the heat of the presidential campaign.

In his testimony, Morell said he was deeply troubled by allegations made by lawmakers and some in the media "that I inappropriately altered and influenced CIA's classified analysis and its unclassified talking points about what happened in Benghazi, Libya in September 2012 and that I covered up those actions."

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/02/cia-mike-morell-defends-benghazi-talking-points

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former deputy CIA director defends editing Benghazi talking points (Original Post) dipsydoodle Apr 2014 OP
BENGHAZI1!!?? Javaman Apr 2014 #1
And every time a repug screams BENGHAZI louis-t Apr 2014 #2
Finally, we learn in this article what Republicans are really upset about: cheapdate Apr 2014 #3
Last I read on the subject of al-Qaida dipsydoodle Apr 2014 #4
Violent Islamic fundamentalism is a problem cheapdate Apr 2014 #5
Original AP.org story with updates alp227 Apr 2014 #6

Javaman

(62,517 posts)
1. BENGHAZI1!!??
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 12:29 PM
Apr 2014

queue the crazy right wing to use this for...who the hell knows but it will end in them saying it's further proof of a "cover up".

louis-t

(23,292 posts)
2. And every time a repug screams BENGHAZI
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 02:07 PM
Apr 2014

please remind them that we have hundreds of consulates and embassies and the Republican controlled House said no to increased funding for security two years in a row.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
3. Finally, we learn in this article what Republicans are really upset about:
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 02:08 PM
Apr 2014
"The White House wants to ignore reality and perpetuate the fallacy that al-Qaida and other Islamic extremists are on the verge of defeat," Rogers said.


That was unexpected. I thought it was about all that other crazy shit.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
4. Last I read on the subject of al-Qaida
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 02:14 PM
Apr 2014

was an article stating they'd become stronger than ever largely due to the USA's publicity campaign on their behalf.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
5. Violent Islamic fundamentalism is a problem
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 02:27 PM
Apr 2014

that has not been solved, nor will it be solved, by military action in Iraq and Afghanistan, or by drone strikes in Pakistan and elsewhere.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Former deputy CIA directo...