Obama: No US military involvement in Ukraine
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) President Barack Obama is repeating his position that involving the U.S. military in Ukraine is not an option he is considering.
Obama said Thursday that is because whats happening in Eastern Europe is not a situation that would be amenable to a military solution.
Instead, Obama says Russia has to create an environment in which separatist forces that are occupying buildings in Ukraine disarm and begin negotiations with Ukraines interim government. He says there must also be progress on reforms that meet the interests of various groups inside Ukraine, that elections be held and the country stabilizes its economy.
He says thousands of Russian troops massed along the Ukrainian border were sent there as a gesture of intimidation.
###
Read more: http://www.salon.com/2014/04/17/obama_no_us_military_involvement_in_ukraine/
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)He didn't send troops in to Syria either despite some DUers screaming that he would.
pasto76
(1,589 posts)I have been wondering where the plain _hysteria_ has gone. WAR WAR WAR WAR
it was even more absurd when that same crowd started claiming they had "stopped another war", when it was clear that the President was months ahead of any of them.
tell you I used to support Grayson, but he turned that "we stopped another war" into a pillar of his fundraising.
That's exactly why their US imperialist warmongering meme is completely false.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,922 posts)There goes his Halliburton stock
former9thward
(31,984 posts)It is so big that no one cares about an Eastern European country.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,922 posts)It's mostly rhetorical comment. More business like a war would certainly help it while most other stocks would fall.
former9thward
(31,984 posts)I think our economy has been based on a cold/hot war basis since WW II. True peace would kill it.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,922 posts)I remember the hit the stock market took leading up to the Iraq war.
former9thward
(31,984 posts)It did not know what would happen if we went to war. But it adjusted just fine and hit new highs while we have been at war for the last 13 years.
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)Russia has become the modern 1930s Germany. . .and before I get the "you made a nazi reference," if you look at the things said then by Hitler and the things said by Putin and his supporters (even their relations with Jews), they sound familiar.
Hitler wanted all Germans under the German flag. Putin wants all Russians and will annex and take over parts of countries to get that.
daleo
(21,317 posts)So, a war between the west and Russia is unlikely. Neither wants a war that is an actual existential risk.
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)Makes no sense.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)has taken over DU on this issue.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)"Theyre not interested in any kind of military confrontation with us, understanding that our conventional forces are significantly superior to the Russians. We dont need a war," Obama said, according to a transcript of the interview.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/04/16/obama-russia-doesnt-want-any-kind-of-military-confrontation-with-us/
daleo
(21,317 posts)As such, it made perfect sense - a logical series of connected statements.
Russia prefers to only fight weak enemies.
The west prefers to only fight weak enemies.
Since neither Russia nor the West can reasonably be considered weak, they won't fight each other.
Shemp Howard
(889 posts)True, Hitler wanted all Germans under the German flag. But Hitler also meant to take Warsaw, Paris, and Moscow.
Does Putin really plan to take over all - or most - of Europe? I think not. One, or both, of these is more likely:
1. Putin is a nationalist (as opposed to an expansionist).
2. Putin is actually making what he considers to be defensive moves.
NATO has been encroaching on Russia for years. Even the Baltic states are now members. How would the US behave if, back in the 1970's, Washington, Oregon, and Idaho broke away from the US and joined the Warsaw Pact?
No, I'm not a Putinista. But I do try to see events from all sides.
Armadotrasgo
(28 posts)ever pretended we had a security interest in Ukraine in the first place was a puzzlement.
Cha
(297,154 posts)Armadotrasgo
(28 posts)Chuck Hagel made the Sunday talk show rounds trying ( and failing in my view) to make the case that we have a strategic interest in Ukraine. Is it your point that the U.S. Actually has such an interest, so you quarrel with my use of the word "pretending"?
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)jakeXT
(10,575 posts)They barely got Russian TV on there, how should they do it ?
Employees at the tower said the men, who were armed with Kalashnikov rifles, barged in after arriving in cars and frightening off guards by firing a shot.
TV engineers accompanying the men then took Ukrainian channels off the air and replaced them with five Russian channels.
The channels included Russia 1, Russia 24 and ORT - some of the most popular state-controlled channels - which were broadcasting clips of Putin's TV phone-in.
http://news.yahoo.com/armed-men-put-putin-air-eastern-ukraine-180815145--sector.html