Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,018 posts)
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 01:01 PM Apr 2014

IRS paid 1,100 of its employees bonuses although they owed back taxes

Last edited Wed Apr 23, 2014, 03:10 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON --Failure to pay taxes usually is bad news for most Americans, but apparently not for some employees of the Internal Revenue Service –-they received performance bonuses from the agency despite failing to submit what they owed.

The IRS paid a total of about $1.1 million in bonuses over approximately a two-year period to more than 1,100 employees who had been disciplined for "substantiated federal tax compliance problems," according to an inspector general's report.

Those employees also received awards of more than 10,000 hours of extra time off and 69 faster-than-normal pay grade increases. They were among more than 2,800 IRS employees during that period who got performance awards within one year of disciplinary action, such as suspensions or written reprimands, the report found.

The performance awards did not violate the law, said J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration.

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-irs-taxes-bonuses-20140423,0,876215.story



Fixed link
65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IRS paid 1,100 of its employees bonuses although they owed back taxes (Original Post) alp227 Apr 2014 OP
I don't understand why they are getting bonuses at all ebbie15644 Apr 2014 #1
Because they are competing with the private sector for talent. joeglow3 Apr 2014 #2
How many people in the private sector are getting bonuses these days? Psephos Apr 2014 #10
I am a tax accountant and a LOT are joeglow3 Apr 2014 #13
People at the IRS could not get similar jobs in the private sector. former9thward Apr 2014 #24
Bull shit they couldn't joeglow3 Apr 2014 #31
I will give you my experience with IRS employees. former9thward Apr 2014 #33
I will give you my experience with IRS employees. joeglow3 Apr 2014 #36
So only the Fortune 500 gets "best and the brightest". former9thward Apr 2014 #38
The Fortune 500 are the best tax cheats hack89 Apr 2014 #40
So, ALL IRS agents are mouth breathing morons joeglow3 Apr 2014 #41
You are the only one in this thread to use the word "moron". former9thward Apr 2014 #42
You said they were ONLY qualified to work for the Service (and my company). joeglow3 Apr 2014 #43
Sorry I am not in the name calling business. former9thward Apr 2014 #45
No. You just describe what you think of them. joeglow3 Apr 2014 #46
I did not describe what I thought of them. former9thward Apr 2014 #47
What did you mean when you said they were qualified to work nowhere else? joeglow3 Apr 2014 #48
I will tell you when you cut and paste showing I made that statement. former9thward Apr 2014 #49
OK wickerwoman Apr 2014 #50
That is not the statement you posted. former9thward Apr 2014 #51
Alternately, wickerwoman Apr 2014 #52
I have had a conversation with one poster. former9thward Apr 2014 #54
Keep spinning joeglow3 Apr 2014 #53
I am not trying to "talk my way out of it". former9thward Apr 2014 #55
You are absolutely amazing. joeglow3 Apr 2014 #57
You continue to make stuff up. former9thward Apr 2014 #58
You are free to use common sense joeglow3 Apr 2014 #59
I found another company where ex agents work joeglow3 Apr 2014 #62
Well you are correct that the F 500 are snatching up the bright people. former9thward Apr 2014 #63
My tax attorney is a former IRS agent jberryhill Apr 2014 #34
See post #33 former9thward Apr 2014 #35
More than 100,000 people work for the IRS. wickerwoman Apr 2014 #39
A lot do leave joeglow3 Apr 2014 #44
1000 dollars a head .. bonus based on performance not owed taxes... why is this even a news item? srican69 Apr 2014 #3
Because it's an excuse to crap on government employees? wickerwoman Apr 2014 #11
+1 nt Live and Learn Apr 2014 #21
Boy, ain't that the truth. Le Taz Hot Apr 2014 #22
You could look at it that way... sendero Apr 2014 #23
They do. wickerwoman Apr 2014 #37
and that's over a two year period Enrique Apr 2014 #18
I would feel insulted if my manager gave me a $1000 bonus.. srican69 Apr 2014 #19
I'm sure they will be returning the bonus. former9thward Apr 2014 #25
I'm sure that *every* DUer would be *deeply* insulted by a $1000 bonus. (nt) Nye Bevan Apr 2014 #56
they should be ..if they routinely work long hours without overtime srican69 Apr 2014 #61
Scratching my head over this one too jberryhill Apr 2014 #27
I had a dispute with the IRS a few years back ... should my company have withheld my JoePhilly Apr 2014 #4
If one of my collection employees owed money to a subcontractor of ours Bonduel Apr 2014 #14
Totally different situation. Government is not involved. JoePhilly Apr 2014 #15
and your example above is a different situation as well Bonduel Apr 2014 #16
Actually, in your example ... your employee might be able to sue you. JoePhilly Apr 2014 #17
Well I don't know what their bonus situation is Bonduel Apr 2014 #28
So will Fox news be celebrating these patriots? MattP Apr 2014 #5
Sounds like this came from FOX news meanit Apr 2014 #6
this LBN post is a mess and the link doesn't work CreekDog Apr 2014 #7
Yeah, that is weird. Dr. Strange Apr 2014 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author William769 Apr 2014 #9
Well, that's just stupid. Pterodactyl Apr 2014 #12
why is everyone in Washington so out of touch? Supersedeas May 2014 #64
Because they are not held accountable. Pterodactyl May 2014 #65
some corporation better not be havin' dreams of a private 'for profit' IRS. That would be worse than Sunlei Apr 2014 #20
What does one have to do with the other? jberryhill Apr 2014 #26
Agree. As pointed out upthread ... SomeGuyInEagan Apr 2014 #30
Could Bundy have gotten away with it if he was an IRS agent? darkangel218 Apr 2014 #29
Wages Calista241 Apr 2014 #32
I owed back taxes, they took my refund until DiverDave Apr 2014 #60

ebbie15644

(1,214 posts)
1. I don't understand why they are getting bonuses at all
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 01:34 PM
Apr 2014

I worked for local and state government and never even got a Christmas certificate as a gift let alone a bonus.

Psephos

(8,032 posts)
10. How many people in the private sector are getting bonuses these days?
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 03:24 PM
Apr 2014

Besides the banksters?

Not many.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
24. People at the IRS could not get similar jobs in the private sector.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 09:46 AM
Apr 2014

So, no they are not competing. That is BS.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
31. Bull shit they couldn't
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 11:07 AM
Apr 2014

I am a tax CPA. People I graduated with went to work there. The company I work for is part of their CAP program and I work daily with an IRS agent who just left a CPA firm to work for the IRS. But thanks for talking out of your ass.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
33. I will give you my experience with IRS employees.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 11:41 AM
Apr 2014

I have been audited two times in the last three years. First audit they said I owed $8000 in back taxes and penalties. Last year they said I owed $3000 in back taxes in penalties. Both cases arose over stock sales. In both cases the IRS employee I was dealing with thought you got stock for free. So when you sold it, all was profit. I had to explain that you had to buy stock and you subtract that price from your sales price.

After the first audit I got a check from the IRS for $187 because originally I hadn't bothered to take a credit. The second audit ended a couple weeks ago when they sent me a notice saying my tax bill was $0.

But you think these people could get jobs in the private sector. Well maybe working for you but nowhere else.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
36. I will give you my experience with IRS employees.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 01:37 PM
Apr 2014

I work for a Fortune 500 company that is under continuous audit with the IRS. For the first few years, we were under a post file examination. We were then admitted to the Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) program, which is where we have been for the last 4 years. The IRS has a permanent office in our building with anywhere from 1-12 people on site every day.

That said, your example explains EXACTLY why the IRS is beginning to offer bonuses. When they are not competitive, they end up with morons like you dealt with.

But go ahead and try to insult the multi billion dollar company I work for and pretend like your stock sales of five figures gets the attention of the Service's best and brightest.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
38. So only the Fortune 500 gets "best and the brightest".
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 02:24 PM
Apr 2014

The rest of us scum just have to put up with the "morons" as you called them. Yeah, I know where you are coming from.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
40. The Fortune 500 are the best tax cheats
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 03:13 PM
Apr 2014

they need the best auditors to get that money. Given the amounts the corporations are stealing from us, I would rather the best IRS employees focus on the corporations.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
41. So, ALL IRS agents are mouth breathing morons
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 04:00 PM
Apr 2014

They are only qualified to work for the IRS and my company? I know where you are coming from as well.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
42. You are the only one in this thread to use the word "moron".
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 04:16 PM
Apr 2014

Apparently in your world they are "the best and the brightest" or they are a "moron".

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
43. You said they were ONLY qualified to work for the Service (and my company).
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 04:21 PM
Apr 2014

Please go back and re-read what you wrote and tell me what adjective best describes what you posted.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
46. No. You just describe what you think of them.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 04:33 PM
Apr 2014

That way, you can make the same terrible claim, but can feign ignorance when called on it.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
47. I did not describe what I thought of them.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 04:39 PM
Apr 2014

I gave the facts of my experience. You then made the characterization.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
49. I will tell you when you cut and paste showing I made that statement.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 04:58 PM
Apr 2014

I never said "they were qualified to work nowhere else."

wickerwoman

(5,662 posts)
50. OK
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 05:08 PM
Apr 2014

"People at the IRS could not get similar jobs in the private sector." Post 24

"But you think these people could get jobs in the private sector. Well maybe working for you but nowhere else." Post 33.

wickerwoman

(5,662 posts)
52. Alternately,
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 06:22 PM
Apr 2014

you could just gracefully admit that in anger you posted something factually incorrect and have been called on it by a number of posters.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
54. I have had a conversation with one poster.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 10:36 PM
Apr 2014

Don't know who the "number of posters" are. I posted my factual experience. The IRS employees I have interacted with should not be working anywhere in that type of job. That is a fact.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
53. Keep spinning
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 10:28 PM
Apr 2014

Many others here have noticed it too. You make convince yourself that you have talked your way out it, but no one else is convinced.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
55. I am not trying to "talk my way out of it".
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 10:39 PM
Apr 2014

"Many others here have noticed it too." I guess you have appointed yourself to speak for the "many". You are someone who thinks people who work for the government can do no wrong. So you just put your head in the sand.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
57. You are absolutely amazing.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 11:22 PM
Apr 2014

Show me where I said government workers can do no wrong. I simply said the IRS is competing with accounting firms for top talent. YOU then said that based on two experiences with a couple agents that none of the 100,000+ agents are qualified to work in a tax/accounting job outside of the service.

What is laughable is I manage the real time audit for a billion dollar company and YOU claim to have more in depth experiences with the IRS.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
58. You continue to make stuff up.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 11:33 PM
Apr 2014

I never said "I have more in depth experiences with the IRS". I said what my experiences were. Whatever you say that's what you say. As with me. This being an anonymous board we can say anything. Maybe it is true, maybe is it total BS. All I can give is my general opinion -- which counts as much as yours, Fortune 500 and all. Maybe you are working out of a garage. Maybe I have never paid taxes in my life. No one can know. Unless we both go over performance reviews and backgrounds of 100,000 people we have to give generalized opinions.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
59. You are free to use common sense
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 11:35 PM
Apr 2014

No rational person thinks none of 100,000+ employees is qualified to work in an accounting/tax job outside of the service.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
63. Well you are correct that the F 500 are snatching up the bright people.
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 11:03 PM
Apr 2014

Maybe they should do some training before they all leave.

wickerwoman

(5,662 posts)
39. More than 100,000 people work for the IRS.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 03:07 PM
Apr 2014

Your experience with one of them doesn't speak to the professional competence of everyone in the entire organisation.

Most IRS agents have degrees in accounting and could use them to compete on the open market if they chose.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
44. A lot do leave
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 04:22 PM
Apr 2014

They work for the Service for a few years to get experience and then dart for better money.

srican69

(1,426 posts)
3. 1000 dollars a head .. bonus based on performance not owed taxes... why is this even a news item?
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 01:40 PM
Apr 2014

sigh !

wickerwoman

(5,662 posts)
11. Because it's an excuse to crap on government employees?
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 03:39 PM
Apr 2014

Name one company ever that withheld a performance bonus because the employee owed back taxes? The one has nothing to do with the other. If they have a union contract, it probably stipulates the circumstances under which they should be given bonuses. If they are on contract, then it would be breaching that contract not to give the bonuses for unrelated reasons.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
22. Boy, ain't that the truth.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 05:37 AM
Apr 2014

I had NO IDEA there were so many anti-gummit people on this site. I found out yesterday just how many. Holy shit!

sendero

(28,552 posts)
23. You could look at it that way...
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 07:12 AM
Apr 2014

... or you could wonder why an agency that is famous for bulldozer tactics to collect back taxes cannot apply that to their own employees. Seems like a double standard to me. And frankly, I have a very low opinion of people who don't pay their taxes to begin with. If I ran the IRS and you wouldn't pay your taxes, you would not be working for the IRS, period.

wickerwoman

(5,662 posts)
37. They do.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 02:24 PM
Apr 2014

IRS agents can be fired for filing their returns late, let alone owing back taxes.

I have a low opinion of people who don't pay their taxes as well, but I also think that we need to maintain a wall between people's personal lives and their employed lives. I don't think people should be able to be fired or have their bonuses revoked because they smoke or drink or eat too much or gamble or watch porn in their free time *as long as it has no impact on their work performance*.

Owing back taxes is bad (although it can also be the result of a misunderstanding). But I don't think it impacts work performance and any half decent employment contract would make that distinction when it comes to performance bonuses.

I also think an organisation like the IRS needs to maintain firewalls between information that it gathers for one purpose (to collect taxes) and other possible uses of that information (assessing employee performance). I don't think it's ethical for HR to access that information and use it for reasons other than what it was intended for. It's like someone working for a medical insurance company losing their job because HR found out through their claims that they had HIV or cancer.

srican69

(1,426 posts)
19. I would feel insulted if my manager gave me a $1000 bonus..
Thu Apr 24, 2014, 12:47 PM
Apr 2014

I doesn't even cover the extra expenses during holiday season...

srican69

(1,426 posts)
61. they should be ..if they routinely work long hours without overtime
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 04:23 PM
Apr 2014

And the bonus is the only mechanism to reward that effort

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
27. Scratching my head over this one too
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 10:19 AM
Apr 2014

How many bank employees are late on their bank-issued credit cards.

Their personal business, and their job performance, are two different things.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
4. I had a dispute with the IRS a few years back ... should my company have withheld my
Wed Apr 23, 2014, 01:41 PM
Apr 2014

bonus?

It took me about 6 months to get it totally straightened out. My wife had left her job mid-year, and the next year her employer sent us a W-2 that was wrong. It differed significantly from what they sent the government.

I'd have been pretty angry if my company didn't give me the bonus that I was supposed to receive for my work ... I earned it.

Do we really want ANY employer, even the government, withholding pay, because of a disagreement about one's tax situation?

Sure, if you go to court and LOSE, then maybe they take from your wages as part of the legal settlement. But if that's not the case, I'd be against them withholding bonus for this reason.


 

Bonduel

(96 posts)
14. If one of my collection employees owed money to a subcontractor of ours
Thu Apr 24, 2014, 11:35 AM
Apr 2014

and I was having them be tough on the same sub for money owed to my company, you can bet I would hold a bonus back until it was cleared up. It becomes very difficult for me to look a sub in the eye and tell them they need to pay their bills when people in my own collection department owe them money.

 

Bonduel

(96 posts)
16. and your example above is a different situation as well
Thu Apr 24, 2014, 11:59 AM
Apr 2014

I wouldn't care if one of my employees owed taxes to the government because he doesn't work for the government. He works for me. These people have a job that collects taxes from people and they don't like it when you don't pay. Yet they have people who work for them who aren't paying their taxes. I don't think they should lose their job but I also don't think they should get a bonus until this is cleared up.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
17. Actually, in your example ... your employee might be able to sue you.
Thu Apr 24, 2014, 12:29 PM
Apr 2014

Let's say you work for me. I have a construction company and I sub-contract some areas, like plumbing. You are my employee, and you get one of the sub-contractors I use to help you do renovations on your home. That arrangement is 100% between you and that sub. My business is not involved.

Now, if you and that sub-contractor get into a dispute over who owes who ... I am not involved in any way. And, if I include bonuses as part of your total compensation, and that bonus is based on your performance as my employee, that money is yours, and I can not withhold it from you if you and that sub contract have a dispute. My business is not part of it.

Now, back to the government. If an IRS employee is having a dispute over how much taxes they have paid, you can't withhold their earnings. Or, I guess we think the government should be able to just stop paying them altogether. The bonus is part of their total compensation. You can no more withhold that, they you can stop paying their medical benefits that are also part of the job.

To do so is basically extortion.

 

Bonduel

(96 posts)
28. Well I don't know what their bonus situation is
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 10:31 AM
Apr 2014

but I completely control the bonuses I give out. All of my employees know that they may or may not get a bonus. There is no set amount or even a promise that they will get one. And actually my example is flawed in that my employee would not owe the money to a sub but back to me. Now, I admit, there could be an agreement on paying a debt back to me but that certainly doesn't seem to be the case here. If my employee owes me money that he is suppose to pay me but doesn't I will certainly hold back a possible bonus he might get until it is cleared up.

Response to alp227 (Original post)

Pterodactyl

(1,687 posts)
65. Because they are not held accountable.
Thu May 1, 2014, 08:15 PM
May 2014

In the private sector, having legal problems and committing crimes could endanger employment.

Same thing with Hollywood and sports. There are not enough penalties for bad behavior.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
20. some corporation better not be havin' dreams of a private 'for profit' IRS. That would be worse than
Thu Apr 24, 2014, 01:38 PM
Apr 2014

what we have today.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
26. What does one have to do with the other?
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 10:18 AM
Apr 2014

They are paid bonuses based on their job performance, just like other employees.

They aren't working for the "company store". Their personal money management issues are not a job performance criterion.

This is a complete non-issue.

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
32. Wages
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 11:21 AM
Apr 2014

Unless their wages are being garnished, the IRS has no legal ability to withhold any earned or entitled income.

DiverDave

(4,886 posts)
60. I owed back taxes, they took my refund until
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 03:56 PM
Apr 2014

the debt was satisfied.
for years, I didn't get my refund, I paid them back...
WTF is so different that THEY get bonuses? Fairness demands they take any refunds
or bonuses until the back taxes are paid.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»IRS paid 1,100 of its emp...