Democrats Walk Out of Kane Impeachment Hearing
Source: Philadelphia Magazine
Rep. Daryl Metcalfes attempt to impeach Attorney General Kathleen Kane wasn't expected to get far, and so far it hasnt. Newsworks reports that Democrats walked out of a committee hearing on impeachment Tuesday.
Democrats made two attempts to put the kibosh on the meeting held by the State Government Committee. The second adjournment effort came from Rep. Mike OBrien of Philadelphia. A terse exchange with Chairman Daryl Metcalfe, R-Butler, followed with Metcalfe asking security to show OBrien the door.
Please remove Rep. OBrien from this hearing, said Metcalfe. I would like to make a motion to adjourn, OBrien responded, speaking over Metcalfe.
You are not recognized, Metcalfe insisted. The microphone is not on for you to be recognized. (The microphone was on.) Thats it. Were out of here, OBrien shot back, as his Democratic colleagues rose from their seats. Have your kangaroo court, pal.
Democrats later said Metcalfe wasnt following proper protocols; Metcalfe has sought Kanes impeachment since she declined to defend state laws banning gay marriage from a court challenge
Read more: http://www.phillymag.com/news/2014/05/07/democrats-walk-kane-impeachment-hearing
Kathleen Kane is a Democratic asskicker with a promising future. They would love to get rid of her.
mopinko
(70,071 posts)they just think of laws as tools that either these use or that get used against them. their purpose and intent means nothing to them.
(not all lawyers, i know.)
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)The lawyers are on the side of the angels here.
mopinko
(70,071 posts)i do think a lot of lawyers see things that way.
good lawyers exempted, of course.
it is a beautiful thing to see.
malthaussen
(17,184 posts)On what grounds could Metcalfe refuse to recognize O'Brien?
-- Mal
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)For that THEY ought to be impeached.
mountain grammy
(26,614 posts)rocktivity
(44,573 posts)Does Kane have the power to decline what she prosecutes or does she not?
rocktivity[.b]
weissmam
(905 posts)she is under no obligation to defend a law that has been shouwn to unconsitiutional - so I wsh the GOP wing nuts luck with this one
Blue Owl
(50,347 posts)n/t
Arkana
(24,347 posts)Tom Corbett needs an asskicking and she sounds like the one to do it. Either that or Senate in 2016--Toomey needs to go.
BumRushDaShow
(128,764 posts)And they are waiting (actually the 'thugs are screaming) for her final report to be released (they want it as soon as possible). They are afraid she'll drop the grenade into the pre-November general election period. This is why they are trying to get rid of her any which way they can.
PA folks need to GOTV this year for damn sure!
Gothmog
(145,086 posts)This is a political stunt by a homophobe who really hates gays and no one thinks that the full Penn. House will pass this stupid motion http://triblive.com/politics/politicalheadlines/6049502-74/kane-general-attorney#axzz30qnpC1nx
HARRISBURG The ranking Democrat on the House State Government Committee said the Republican chairman's resolution to impeach Attorney General Kathleen Kane is based on policy decisions, not wrongdoing.
The committee plans a non-voting session on Tuesday about impeaching Kane, the first woman and first Democrat elected attorney general. Any subsequent committee vote would need House approval. A House vote to impeach would trigger a trial in the Senate.
Last week, Kane declined to comment on the hearing. Chairman Daryl Metcalfe, R-Cranberry, didn't invite her to testify.
Political experts view the chances of impeachment proceeding as slim in the Republican-controlled Legislature.
This just doesn't make sense for the long-range future of Pennsylvania. It would be a mistake, said Rep. Mark Cohen, D-Philadelphia, the minority chairman.
There are some real nutcases in the GOP
Aldo Leopold
(685 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,169 posts)We all know if a rep gets a little too progressive in their stances, they get a blue dog competitor flown in with all the money and blessings of the top DLC honchos.