Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,014 posts)
Wed May 7, 2014, 06:34 PM May 2014

Federal appeals court stays ruling halting Doe probe into Walker recall

Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Less than 24 hours after a federal judge halted a probe into conservative groups and the campaign of Gov. Scott Walker, an appeals court blocked that ruling — allowing prosecutors to keep material they have gathered in the case.

The three-judge panel of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago provided a means for U.S. District Rudolph Randa in Milwaukee to reissue his preliminary injunction stopping the investigation, but it said he cannot order prosecutors to destroy evidence they have collected so far.

Also Wednesday, Randa ruled a coalition of five media groups could intervene in the case in its attempt to unseal hundreds of pages of court filings that have been blacked out. He gave all sides a week to object to making that material public.

Randa's earlier decision, issued late Tuesday, essentially cleared conservatives of illegal campaigning in Wisconsin's 2011 and 2012 recall races by saying the long-running John Doe investigation into campaign spending and fundraising appeared to violate the Wisconsin Club for Growth's free speech rights. Randa's ruling — rated as no less than stunning by Democrats and Republicans alike — called for the destruction of the evidence in the case and seemingly eliminated a key obstacle to the GOP governor's 2014 re-election campaign and 2016 presidential hopes.

But the appeals panel stayed Randa's order stopping the investigation, saying he did not have the authority to do that because prosecutors had already appealed an earlier decision in the case. Randa could issue his injunction only if he certified the appeal as frivolous, and he never ruled on that point — though he had recently written he was inclined to believe it is frivolous.

Read more: http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/halt-to-john-doe-probe-lifts-obstacle-to-scott-walker-re-election-bid-b99264574z1-258293621.html



Nice try, Scotty.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal appeals court stays ruling halting Doe probe into Walker recall (Original Post) deminks May 2014 OP
Good, that judge seriously abused his power Bjorn Against May 2014 #1
Destroy evidence? Demeter May 2014 #2
This is great news Gothmog May 2014 #3
It is good news, but unfortunately not quite that good. Bjorn Against May 2014 #6
To do so, the judge has to rule that the prior appeal of his ruling was frivilous Gothmog May 2014 #9
Yes, they did tell him he went too far Bjorn Against May 2014 #11
So violating the law is free speech?! mindwalker_i May 2014 #4
another toadie judge NYtoBush-Drop Dead May 2014 #5
I agree with the Poli Sci prof - sadly recent SCOTUS Jake Stern May 2014 #7
The Wisconsin Club for Growth is not a person. It has no free speech rights. Thor_MN May 2014 #8
The scariest part is that ... GeorgeGist May 2014 #10
Well, at least they got it back into the news cycle for us. nt silvershadow May 2014 #12
Just pull an Assange Pharaoh May 2014 #13
kick OKNancy May 2014 #14
That was quick. I'm sure the USSC will take longer to overturn this. n/t malthaussen May 2014 #15
K & R nt okaawhatever May 2014 #16

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
1. Good, that judge seriously abused his power
Wed May 7, 2014, 06:52 PM
May 2014

Calling for an end to the investigation would be one thing, it would be a bad decision but not necessarilly an abuse of power. Ordering the destruction of all evidence is an abuse of power however, they really need to make it easier to remove judges like him from the bench.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
6. It is good news, but unfortunately not quite that good.
Wed May 7, 2014, 07:12 PM
May 2014

Read the second paragraph where it says the judge can still issue an injunction stopping the investigation, he just can't order the destruction of evidence gathered. It is good news that the evidence won't be destroyed, but that judge is still going to hinder the investigation and buy Walker more time.

Gothmog

(145,130 posts)
9. To do so, the judge has to rule that the prior appeal of his ruling was frivilous
Wed May 7, 2014, 07:30 PM
May 2014

Such a ruling would be easy to appeal and to get another stayed. This is from the article cited above

Even before Tuesday's ruling, prosecutors had appealed the case. In a filing Monday, they asked the appeals court to halt proceedings before Randa as they argued the case should be dismissed.

In their latest filing, they contended Randa did not have the ability to issue Tuesday's decision because of their earlier appeals and noted Randa issued his ruling without holding a hearing.

"The order was issued without jurisdiction and is void for that reason," they wrote.

The appeals court consists of 14 judges. Like most cases, this one will be decided by a randomly chosen 3-judge panel.

Seven years ago, a panel from that court reversed Randa in another criminal case with strong political overtones.

In April 2007, the appeals court ruled that state purchasing supervisor Georgia L. Thompson was wrongly convicted of making sure a state travel contract went to a firm linked to Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle's re-election campaign.

Read more from Journal Sentinel: http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/halt-to-john-doe-probe-lifts-obstacle-to-scott-walker-re-election-bid-b99264574z1-258293621.html#ixzz314jxcDoP

This judge is playing political games and overreached. The court of appeals has slapped him down already and appears to be ready to do so again. I read the ruling from the appeals court as telling this judge that he went too far.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
11. Yes, they did tell him he went too far
Wed May 7, 2014, 07:39 PM
May 2014

It is extremely important that they ruled he can not order the destruction of evidence, they did still leave the door open to him to stop the investigation at least on a temporary basis however. You may well be right that the appeals court will slap him down again at some point later, but he will likely be able to put a temporary halt to the investigation which will delay any attempts at prosecution for who knows how long.

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
7. I agree with the Poli Sci prof - sadly recent SCOTUS
Wed May 7, 2014, 07:23 PM
May 2014

Rulings are on Walker and CFGs side. I predict 5-4 against the prosecution.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
8. The Wisconsin Club for Growth is not a person. It has no free speech rights.
Wed May 7, 2014, 07:25 PM
May 2014

The members can say whatever the hell they want, but the club has no First Amendment rights to free speech. Investigation in no way prevents anyone from saying anything, so Rethug Rudy Randa's ruling is ridiculous.

 

Pharaoh

(8,209 posts)
13. Just pull an Assange
Wed May 7, 2014, 09:58 PM
May 2014

And put it all on the web. We want transparency, they want dark secrets.......

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal appeals court sta...