Kitty litter eyed as possible culprit in New Mexico radiation leak
Source: Reuters
Kitty litter eyed as possible culprit in New Mexico radiation leak
By Laura Zuckerman
Tue May 13, 2014 10:50pm EDT
(Reuters) - Kitty litter used to absorb liquid in radioactive debris may have triggered a chemical reaction that caused a radiation leak at a below-ground U.S. nuclear waste storage site in New Mexico, a state environmental official said on Tuesday.
The waste disposal site, where drums of plutonium-tainted refuse from nuclear weapons factories and laboratories are buried in salt caverns 2,100 feet (640 meters) underground, has been shut down since unsafe radiation levels were first detected there on Feb. 14.
The leak of radiation, a small amount of which escaped to the surface and exposed 21 workers at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, ranks as the worst accident at the facility and one of the few blemishes on its safety record since it opened in 1999.
Investigations of the chamber where the leak occurred suggest a chemical reaction may have generated sufficient heat to melt seals on drums and boxes of contaminated sludge from the Los Alamos Nuclear Laboratory, releasing radioisotopes such as plutonium, Energy Department officials have said.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/14/us-usa-nuclear-newmexico-idUSKBN0DU04220140514?rpc=401&feedType=RSS&feedName=environmentNews&rpc=401
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Published: May 10th, 2014 at 6:00 pm ET
By ENENews
Santa Fe New Mexican, May 9, 2014: Nuke expert believes kitty litter switch led to WIPP leak An absorbent material similar to kitty litter is the likely cause of a radiation leak [...] according to a longtime nuclear expert. [...] Los Alamos National Laboratory [...] switched from using a clay- based absorbent in the drums [sent to WIPP] to a wheat-based absorbent both made of the same materials used in different types of kitty litter, according to Jim Conca, a geochemist who worked for years at the lab and in environmental monitoring for WIPP. [...] The kitty litter switch could have created dried-out nitrate salts and led to a mild explosion in one or more of the waste containers, Conca said. [...] LANL, Department of Energy and WIPP did not specifically comment on the theory. [...] Conca is a nuclear power advocate and a WIPP believer, so hes hoping his kitty litter theory proves correct. [...] The organic absorbents made of wheat or corn [...] It absorbs like a sponge. If you let the salts dry out completely, they can ignite.
Jim Conca, Forbes columnist who worked in environmental monitoring for WIPP: I think it is the most likely cause, but there is still some room for doubt until they get to the drum that leaked. [It is] an awfully good thing this drum was in WIPP when it went off because if had been anywhere else, just think about what might have happened. So they need to act quickly, they need to corral all these drums and get them into WIPP right away, put them in Panel 7 and seal it off [...] it is incredibly important to act quickly. You dont want to wait months and let the drums keep drying out. They need to be gathered quickly and get them to WIPP. By being stupid, we risk doing this wrong and making it worse.
Forbes, May 10, 2014: Nuclear Waste Leak Traced To Kitty Litter [...] Cat litter has been used for decades in radiochemistry labs and nuclear facilities to stabilize certain radwastes [...] Unfortunately, someone working with this waste, before it was to be shipped to WIPP, used a new green cat litter, made with materials like wheat or corn. These organic litters do not have the silicate properties needed to chemically stabilize nitrate the correct way. [...] We still need more visual evidence to be absolutely certain. The drum thought to have burst is about 10 rows back from the waste face. [...] We know which drums were treated with this green litter. Some are stored at WIPP and some are stored at other places. [...] Seal off Panel 6 with the normal metal bulkheads at either end. This will contain any event from these drums. All other drums with green litter should quickly be corralled from where they are, shipped under containment, emplaced in Panel 7 at WIPP and the panel sealed off. It would be the safest thing to do. [...] Another important point is that these materials become less stable when theyre heated. So in the mean time, it is important to make sure that these drums are segregated and kept in a cool environment. Summer is coming. [...] We need to act quickly.
MORE
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)complication and continued to utilize already effective containment proceedures.
What a seriously hazardous situation they've created.
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)I'd say, some bean counter came up with a cost analysis, substituted the wheat based absorbent and the scientists never knew. There is aplace for accountants but they should not be making decisions about things they have little or no knowledge.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)I suspect this is plain old incompetence. Anyway, there is no excuse for not testing a substitute material before using it when dealing with nuclear waste.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...none of the nuclear facilities operate with anything close to lab procedures, or they wouldn't have such lousy safety records, violations and in WIPP's case, possibly permanently injuring 21 workers for life.
As with all the other facilities in this country, they are leaking radioactive waste and water every single second of every single day. Hansford is the absolute worse no doubt about it, and WIPP is more worrisome because they don't seem to have a clue about what they're doing down there. But at least most of the waste is underground -- for now.
The sloppy safety track record at WIPP is little different than some of the others. For example, an Energy Dept Accident Investigation Board report says staff didn't know enough about vent safety bypass design requirements for the HEPA filter safety dampers for the ventilation system. Leakage was found later to have resulted from those unfiltered release of radioactive waste directly into the environment.
- What's worst about WIPP as far as I'm concerned, is that everyone downwind is vulnerable to alpha particulates in the air from the Plutonium and Americium bomb waste. That's what is crammed into all those old leaking barrels is nuclear bomb waste and green kitty-litter turning to nitrates and waiting for an ignition source. The WIPP is bad news just waiting to be reported.
During the decay of plutonium, three types of radiation are releasedalpha, beta, and gamma. Alpha radiation can travel only a short distance and cannot travel through the outer, dead layer of human skin. Beta radiation can penetrate human skin, but cannot go all the way through the body. Gamma radiation can go all the way through the body. Alpha, beta, and gamma radiation are all forms of ionizing radiation. Either acute or longer-term exposure carries a danger of serious health outcomes including radiation sickness, genetic damage, cancer, and death. The danger increases with the amount of exposure.
Even though alpha radiation cannot penetrate the skin, ingested or inhaled plutonium does irradiate internal organs. The skeleton, where plutonium accumulates, and the liver, where it collects and becomes concentrated, are at risk. Plutonium is not absorbed into the body efficiently when ingested; only 0.04% of plutonium oxide is absorbed after ingestion. Plutonium absorbed by the body is excreted very slowly, with a biological half-life of 200 years. Plutonium passes only slowly through cell membranes and intestinal boundaries, so absorption by ingestion and incorporation into bone structure proceeds very slowly. link
If consumed, americium is excreted within a few days and only 0.05% is absorbed in the blood. From there, roughly 45% of it goes to the liver and 45% to the bones, and the remaining 10% is excreted. The uptake to the liver depends on the individual and increases with age. In the bones, americium is first deposited over cortical and trabecular surfaces and slowly redistributes over the bone with time. The biological half-life of 241Am is 50 years in the bones and 20 years in the liver, whereas in the gonads (testicles and ovaries) it remains permanently; in all these organs, americium promotes formation of cancer cells as a result of its radioactivity.
Americium often enters landfills from discarded smoke detectors. The rules associated with the disposal of smoke detectors are relaxed in most jurisdictions. In the U.S., the "Radioactive Boy Scout" David Hahn was able to concentrate americium from smoke detectors after managing to buy a hundred of them at remainder prices and also stealing a few. There have been cases of humans being contaminated with americium, the worst case being that of Harold McCluskey, who at the age of 64 was exposed to 500 times the occupational standard for americium-241 as a result of an explosion in his lab. McCluskey died at the age of 75, not as a result of exposure, but of a heart disease which he had before the accident. link
Judi Lynn
(160,524 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)Now I understand how the kitty litter could have caused the problem. I find that AP, Reuters, and similar articles that purport to report on scientific things (like X causes Y) never actually explain how X could cause Y. It's annoying. And what's more annoying is that I think they think their readers don't see that the crucial explanation part is missing. No wonder "Americans reject science." Most "science" they read about in the mainstream press has no science in it at all.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)- Rupert Murdoch runs AP and some kinda Canadian ''Sir'' billionaire dude owns Reuters, as I recall. And I'm sure they have mining investments......
djean111
(14,255 posts)Safe, my ass. Safe until the inevitable fuckup or natural event.
No more nuclear plants or weapons, please.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)Mixing organic material with nitrates. Who could have guessed?
locks
(2,012 posts)have been trying to tell us, wise up about nuclear waste or you'll destroy us all.
packman
(16,296 posts)they found several high pressure pipes which were wrapped with duct tape. I'll bet that kitty litter cost a bit more than the bag we buy at the Dollar Store because of cost overruns.
They_Live
(3,231 posts)and I was halfway kidding with my masking tape comment below, but now, I guess I wasn't. No need to add a sarcasm tag at this point.
They_Live
(3,231 posts)masking tape and wadded up newspapers this time.
AnnieBW
(10,424 posts)Yikes!