Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
Wed May 21, 2014, 08:49 PM May 2014

'Insane' DOJ Anti-Recording Policy Has Finally Been Reversed

Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- In a major shift, the Justice Department has done away with a longstanding policy that forbade federal agents from recording statements made by criminal suspects in their custody. The policy gave the Justice Department a massive advantage over criminal defendants, ensuring that the use of coercive tactics or ignored requests for an attorney during an interrogation, for example, would not be preserved for the record.

But now, starting on July 11, federal agents with the FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the U.S. Marshals Service will be required -- with some exceptions -- to record interrogations of criminal suspects in their custody. The policy shift was first reported by The Arizona Republic.

Monty Wilkinson, director of the Executive Office of United States Attorneys, wrote in a memo on May 12 that the new policy is the result of the "collaborative and lengthy efforts of a working group comprised of several United States Attorneys and representatives from the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, EOUSA, the Criminal Division, and the National Security Division, as well as the General Counsel, or their representatives, from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the United States Marshals Service."

The new policy, laid out in a memo by Deputy Attorney General James Cole, creates the "presumption that the custodial statement of an individual in a place of detention with suitable recording equipment, following arrest but prior to initial appearance, will be electronically recorded" except under a few special circumstances. The policy "strongly encourages the use of video recording" and does not apply to interviews when suspects are not in custody, though it encourages agents and prosecutors to consider recording those interactions as well.

Continued at Link:

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/21/fbi-recording-policy-reversed_n_5368353.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Insane' DOJ Anti-Recording Policy Has Finally Been Reversed (Original Post) okaawhatever May 2014 OP
Now let's start REQUIRING police to record their interactions, and while we are at it, MADem May 2014 #1
Button cameras Stryst May 2014 #2

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. Now let's start REQUIRING police to record their interactions, and while we are at it,
Thu May 22, 2014, 05:53 AM
May 2014

let's REQUIRE the Supreme Court to do so, as well!

I want to see video of Clarence Thomas snoring!

Stryst

(714 posts)
2. Button cameras
Thu May 22, 2014, 01:16 PM
May 2014

for every police officer too. Justice is blind, but the justice system should be transparent.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Insane' DOJ Anti-Recordi...