Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu May 22, 2014, 04:35 PM May 2014

Evidence Suggested Tsarnaev Brothers Did Not Act Alone

Source: The Boston Globe

By Lara Salahi
Boston.com Correspondent
MAY 22, 2014 3:24 PM

Specific evidence has led federal officials to believe that Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev did not act alone in planning the Boston Marathon attacks, according to arguments submitted Wednesday by the US Attorney’s office.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s lawyers have requested that potentially incriminating comments he made while investigators questioned him at his hospital bedside to be scrapped as evidence in the case against him.

In response to the defense’s motion, the prosecution filed an opposition in the US District Court in Boston to suppress the statement Tsarnaev made during his hospital stay, stating Tsarnaev was never forced to answer any of the questions investigators had asked. The report also states that the prosecution does not plan to use Tsarnaev’s statements as its main argument during the trial and sentencing phase.

One of the filings by the prosecution stated that investigators were led to believe from the bedside questioning that “the Tsarnaevs had accomplices and that they or others might have built additional bombs that posed a continuing danger to public safety.”

-snip-




Read more: http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2014/05/22/evidence-suggested-tsarnaev-brothers-did-not-act-alone/RNANHM7DodtUM5ejtPv5PN/story.html

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Evidence Suggested Tsarnaev Brothers Did Not Act Alone (Original Post) DonViejo May 2014 OP
Hoping whoever their accomplices, IF ANY, have left the country. Or quit fooling around here. freshwest May 2014 #1
That's not good. nt okaawhatever May 2014 #2
Was it the FBI? billhicks76 May 2014 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 May 2014 #3
Who Trusts The FBI??! billhicks76 May 2014 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 May 2014 #5
I agree that you can't trust the cops... olddad56 May 2014 #6
I did billhicks76 May 2014 #7
Q: "Who trusts the FBI?" undiegrinder May 2014 #8
I completely agree on all counts. And that is not everything. But belief in "official" accounts GoneFishin May 2014 #9
Political Bigotry billhicks76 May 2014 #10
Small Pox billhicks76 May 2014 #11
Agreed on the coincidence theorists. I had not seen that term before but it fits, because the GoneFishin May 2014 #13
FDR billhicks76 May 2014 #14
"Isn't it anti-semetic to assume people are referring to Jews? ". Yes, it definitely GoneFishin May 2014 #16
A good indication of Huffington's commitment to free speech ...? undiegrinder May 2014 #17
'Continuing threat' Ash_F May 2014 #15

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
4. Who Trusts The FBI??!
Thu May 22, 2014, 04:47 PM
May 2014

I don't know anyone who believes the cops anymore...especially the top ones. Not the FBI, CIA or the DEA. Their business is lying. They have become disinformation artists. We live in a time of universal deception and it's why people have lost faith in our institutions. This is what usually predicates rebellions and revolts which lead to "attempted" revolutions.

Response to billhicks76 (Reply #4)

olddad56

(5,732 posts)
6. I agree that you can't trust the cops...
Thu May 22, 2014, 05:17 PM
May 2014

I don't know about anymore. I haven't trusted them at any level since i was old enough to think for myself. I don't trust them from the government all the way down to your local municipal armed forces.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
7. I did
Thu May 22, 2014, 06:07 PM
May 2014

I grew up thinking they were there to serve and protect. Maybe it was my upbringing. The only time they were called at my house was because a 15 year old said she was being stalked by a classmate who parked around the corner from our house. They came 5 hours later when I was getting in my car to drive her home and they attacked us all steroided up. In my own driveway they threatened our lives and I lived in a very wealthy neighborhood. I was utterly in shock. After that and seeing what they did on my college campus and much more so at some Grateful Dead shows I knew they were out of control lying stormtroopers but they get their ways from above. I guess money covers it up

undiegrinder

(79 posts)
8. Q: "Who trusts the FBI?"
Thu May 22, 2014, 07:47 PM
May 2014

A: People who, when presented with uncomfortable facts, choose denial (often calling it "patriotism&quot over dealing with the truth ... aka "the easy way out."

It does, after all, take time, effort, an open mind and even some courage to study the details of a case as filled with glaring anomalies, inconsistencies and questionable details as the Boston Marathon Bombing has been since (arguably) BEFORE the bombs even went off.

Unfortunately, questioning the "official story" about ANYthing these days too often results in being branded a "conspiracy theorist" or "tin foil hatter."

Even those trying to, for example, sort out the discrepencies in two conflicting FBI statements withOUT suggesting they're part of a dark, "evil government" theory risk being derided as "crazy" simply for asking.

For me, the biggest problem with "conspiracy theories" is that there's unassailable proof some truly terrible conspiracies HAVE been perpetrated by our government and other powerful organizations including MKULTRA (in which he CIA performed LSD experiments on unknowing civilians) and the Tuskeegee Syphillis Study (in which hundreds of African-American men infected with the disease were never treated for it or even told they had it).

Those precedents entirely aside and WITHOUT any pre-conceived theories, some of the oddities which have emerged in the aftermath of the Boston Marathon Bombing are disconcerting:

* Remember the guy the Tsarnaev brothers supposedly car-jacked -- and to whom they reportedly confessed? In the flurry of TV interviews he gave in the immediate aftermath of his ordeal, his face and voice were always concealed and he's still only ever been identified as "Danny." Though a comparison of his various statements shows that they're not just inconsistent but are even, at times, conflicting, he's remained anonymous and never been asked for clarification.

http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/how-many-holes-can-you-count-in-the-boston-bombing-story.html

* The circumstances surrounding the MIT security guard's murder as described by the media are not consistent with recordings of the police calls.

http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/collier-case-could-collapse-due-to-conflicting-evidence.html

* The "confession" Dzhokhar Tsarnaev supposedly scrawled on the fiberglass hull of the trailered boat in which he lay wounded and hiding (in the dark) wasn't disclosed by the FBI until a full month after the bombings and it's only ever been quoted -- the FBI has never released any full text or photos of it. (And only after a reporter asked what kind of pen could write on fiberglass did the FBI describe it as "a marker.&quot

http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/dzhokhars-note-in-the-boat-a-not-so-water-tight-confession.html

* The killing of material witness Ibragim Todashev with 7 shots (some in his back) by FBI agents after four days of interviewing him and just moments before, they claimed, he was going to sign a confession re: an earlier murder in which both Tsarnaev brothers also supposedly participated. The only investigation of Todashev's killing that was allowed and which completely exonerated the FBI of any wrongdoing was done by ... the FBI.

http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/todashev-agent-involved-in-shooting-had-questionable-history.html

There are many others but these are likely enough to spur an angry detractor or two into posting insults -- but, invariably, never proof.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
9. I completely agree on all counts. And that is not everything. But belief in "official" accounts
Thu May 22, 2014, 08:08 PM
May 2014

of these types of events has evolved into a sort of religion.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
10. Political Bigotry
Thu May 22, 2014, 08:46 PM
May 2014

Prejudicial labeling like "conspiracy theorist" is just the latest political bigotry. It's no different than "pinko" or "commie". It's the last vestige for those who can't argue facts. Unfortunately it's gotten worse now that a democrat is in charge because now our own are doing it. Under Bush it was mostly republicans doing the labeling. Now they act like the victims. But this is the political game designed by our wealthy rulers to deflect blame for actual crimes. I've never seen so many "coincidence theorists" on centrist/democrat sites in my life. Lol

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
11. Small Pox
Thu May 22, 2014, 09:16 PM
May 2014

These same people wouldn't have believed that we gave Native Americans blankets infected with smallpox. Small minds deserve each other. USA!!!

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
13. Agreed on the coincidence theorists. I had not seen that term before but it fits, because the
Thu May 22, 2014, 10:10 PM
May 2014

sales job for the official story always requires that you accept a ridiculous number of "coincidences".

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
14. FDR
Thu May 22, 2014, 10:32 PM
May 2014

Was it not our own FDR that said there are no coincidences in politics? I read yesterday that HuffPost won't let people say the media is owned by powerful interests. Arianna said its anti-semetic. Isn't it anti-semetic to assume people are referring to Jews?

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
16. "Isn't it anti-semetic to assume people are referring to Jews? ". Yes, it definitely
Thu May 22, 2014, 11:34 PM
May 2014

is. But her assumption is very revealing about her own opinion surrounding the topic(s).

undiegrinder

(79 posts)
17. A good indication of Huffington's commitment to free speech ...?
Fri May 23, 2014, 01:24 AM
May 2014

Immediately after it was reported she'd been detained by police for refusing to turn off her Blackberry on a plane flight, the mods at HuffPo were instructed to yank any and all comments mentioning the incident.

http://gawker.com/5735759/arianna-huffington-cannot-bear-a-single-comment-about-her-airline-incident

How many more sad stories like this must we hear before we face the truth about WP (Wealth Poisoning)??

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Evidence Suggested Tsarna...