Fox News Channel’s Bret Baier, Greta Van Susteren Land Hillary Clinton Interview On June 17

[7962]

Source: Deadline.com

Fox News Channel said today that Bret Baier and Greta Van Susteren will conduct a joint half-hour interview with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on June 17, spanning the two anchors’ respective programs. It will begin on Special Report at about 6:45 PM ET and continue during On The Record until 7:15 PM. The interview will cover an array of topics, including the 2016 presidential election, the 2012 attacks in Benghazi and Clinton’s new book, Hard Choices. Van Susteren most recently interviewed Clinton in January 2013.

Read more: http://www.deadline.com/2014/05/fox-news-channels-bret-baier-greta-van-susteren-land-hillary-clinton-interview-on-june-17/

[onehandle]

1. 'Tonight we ask anti-American lesbian Hillary Clinton how she planned the Benghazi attacks.'

Stay tuned...

[hrmjustin]

2. Why are two needed?

[Yavin4]

4. One to ask questions.

And the other to keep screaming, "BENGHAZZI!!!!" for a half hour.

[Beacool]

10. LOL!!!!

Thanks, I needed a laugh.

[louis-t]

6. While one is taking a breath, the other will be

screaming stupid questions in her face, non-stop.

[7962]

12. From the looks of it, I guess one will start, the other finish as their shows run. nt

[cosmicone]

13. Hillary is too smart for one

She was a litigator and could wipe the floor with even three Fauxbots.

[Hulk]

3. Feeding the sick, decaying monster propaganda outlet...

Just one word: why?

[Swede Atlanta]

5. Why did Hillary agree?

I have learned she has a new book coming out....

But still why? No conservative is going to buy her book except for those that think they will find some juicy morsel to use in the Benghazi investigation or the 2016 campaign.

But aside from her profit motive (don't the Clintons have enough money now?) why would she go on Fox News?

They are not interested in facts. So she is not going to get out the facts about Benghazi or anything else.

She is not going to convert any Fox viewers to vote for her in 2016.

So the sole reason must be personal profit.

And therein is the problem with America. Our politicians are only interested in enriching themselves. All other things are secondary.

[Beacool]

18. What profit?

You already stated that Fox viewers wouldn't buy her book.

[SoapBox]

7. I have had it...with these Dems crawling to FuksLyingNews!

Over it!

[Submariner]

8. What a stupid move

all this accomplishes is giving Faux nooz undeserved legitimacy. The Faux nooz viewer certainly won't vote for her. Her republican roots are showing. Dumb...dumb...dumb.

[former9thward]

17. She is going for younger viewers.

Fox has a younger demographic than the so-called major networks.

[frylock]

22. ah, the coveted 65-Methuselah demograph

[former9thward]

23. Fox, not Fox News.

[7962]

29. Believe it or not, more Dems watch Fox than MSNBC or Cnn, according to the ratings

Its an odd thing, for sure. So I guess she's going for whoever they may be.

[840high]

31. I believe it.

[abakan]

9. I think the most interesting part of this will be ... can they remain civil...

With the great Republican enemy in the room. I see mouth frothing and possibly heads exploding as Hillary calmly sits and lets them make fools of themselves. Get out the popcorn and beer, we're going have a really good show.

[7962]

14. Baier & Van Sustren arent Hannity. I doubt she would talk to him. nt

[blm]

27. Greta is a huge Hillary fan - she was Queen PUMA in 2008.

.

[abakan]

28. PUMA ?

I don't know anything about Greta because she doesn't get out in the things I pay attention to.
And I pay no attention to FOX. My blood pressure prohibits watching it.

[840high]

32. Greta is a professional.

[Snarkoleptic]

11. My hope is they can remain civil and not repeatedly and rudely interrupt like Billo did

when interviewing President Obama.

[Kelvin Mace]

15. I thought HRC was supposed to be politcally savvy?

Only three types of Dems appear on FOX: Fools, Vichy Dems or "Bi-Partisan fetishists" (see "Fools&quot .

[blm]

26. She is being savvy, Greta was Queen PUMA. Remember, Hillary has given Greta OTHER first interviews

in the past.

[AAO]

16. BENGHAZI!!!!!!!

[santamargarita]

19. Why would she bother with those vicious, lying assholes.

[geek tragedy]

20. Benghazi? Benghazi benghazi, benghazi, benghazi benghazi? nt

[Doctor_J]

21. Another Dem gives Faux "News" credibility

RIP Democratic Party. As a group there are no principles remaining.

[Skittles]

24. why do legitimate people agree to appear on that shit channel?

it needs to stop

[defacto7]

25. Of what purpose is her appearance on that non-news variety show

that poses as a news outlet?

How could she allow herself to add to lie-news ratings? She will.

The only answer is that she wants to appeal to conservative stupids... gain the ignorant vote.

How the hell could she possibly accomplish that if she stands for anything... (hmm, I can't say Democrat, I can't say liberal, I can't say progressive)... real?

I'm lost?

[c588415]

30. kick their monkey ass, Hillary!

People forget that Hillary is a tough motha; she will mop the floor with any Fox Noise commentator who steps out of line. Hell, I remember when Bill Clinton bitch slapped the hell out of Chris Wallace when he got too fresh during an interview.





Pres. Hillary Clinton 2016!